also sprach martin f krafft [2011.02.02.1607 +0100]:
> One of the hosts' last full backup is now 8.2 days old, while it's
> incremental backup is 0.9 days old.
>
> BackupPC just woke up, but it did not schedule the host,
A colleague suggests this is because backuppc only schedules a host
once a
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 06:20:15PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Robin Lee Powell
> [2011.02.02.1757 +0100]:
> > There's a log for each client, which you can see by accessing
> > the client in the GUI (it'll be the top-most "LOG File" link)
> > and a log for the server as a whole.
>
also sprach Robin Lee Powell [2011.02.02.1757
+0100]:
> There's a log for each client, which you can see by accessing the
> client in the GUI (it'll be the top-most "LOG File" link) and a log
> for the server as a whole.
Oh, of course, sorry. But there is nothing in that log file hinting
at any
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 05:53:33PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Robin Lee Powell [2011.02.02.1720
> +0100]:
> > > 2011-02-02 15:00:00 Next wakeup is 2011-02-02 16:00:00
> > > 2011-02-02 16:00:00 Next wakeup is 2011-02-02 17:00:00
> > > 2011-02-02 17:00:00 Next wakeup is 2011-
also sprach Robin Lee Powell [2011.02.02.1720
+0100]:
> > 2011-02-02 15:00:00 Next wakeup is 2011-02-02 16:00:00
> > 2011-02-02 16:00:00 Next wakeup is 2011-02-02 17:00:00
> > 2011-02-02 17:00:00 Next wakeup is 2011-02-02 18:00:00
> > 2011-02-02 17:00:21 Started full backup on seamus.madd
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 05:11:50PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Robin Lee Powell [2011.02.02.1704
> +0100]:
> > What does the host log say?
>
> Nothing, really:
>
> 2011-02-02 15:00:00 Next wakeup is 2011-02-02 16:00:00
> 2011-02-02 16:00:00 Next wakeup is 2011-02-02 17:00:00
also sprach Robin Lee Powell [2011.02.02.1704
+0100]:
> What does the host log say?
Nothing, really:
2011-02-02 15:00:00 Next wakeup is 2011-02-02 16:00:00
2011-02-02 16:00:00 Next wakeup is 2011-02-02 17:00:00
2011-02-02 17:00:00 Next wakeup is 2011-02-02 18:00:00
2011-02-02 17:00:21 S
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 04:54:57PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Robin Lee Powell [2011.02.02.1628
> +0100]:
> > > What could be the reason for this?
> >
> > Most likely the disk is too full.
>
> Nope. The disk is at 67%. And if it were too full, I would have
> received an e-mail.
also sprach Robin Lee Powell [2011.02.02.1628
+0100]:
> > What could be the reason for this?
>
> Most likely the disk is too full.
Nope. The disk is at 67%. And if it were too full, I would have
received an e-mail.
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
gentoo: the perform
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 04:07:41PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a BackupPC configured with FullPeriod at 7.97 and daily
> incremental backups, no blackout periods, hourly wakeup, and
> 2 consecutive backups permitted.
>
> One of the hosts' last full backup is now 8.2 days old
Hello,
I have a BackupPC configured with FullPeriod at 7.97 and daily
incremental backups, no blackout periods, hourly wakeup, and
2 consecutive backups permitted.
One of the hosts' last full backup is now 8.2 days old, while it's
incremental backup is 0.9 days old.
BackupPC just woke up, but it
11 matches
Mail list logo
