[Bacula-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Problem with *ACL and restore]

2005-05-18 Thread Dmitry Sivachenko
Hello! Just to note that this problem still exists in bacula-1.36.3... Is anybody working on console ACL support? Thanks! - Forwarded message from Dmitry Sivachenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Dmitry Sivachenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Thu, 7 Apr

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Job Behaviour

2005-05-18 Thread Ludovic Strappazon
Hi Sean, It is possible to have Concurrent Jobs running and spooling in the second scenario :-) You can send more details. Ludovic Sean O'Grady wrote: Hello, I'm trying to get a better understanding of Concurrent Job behaviour and how it relates to multiple jobs going to a single Storage

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

2005-05-18 Thread Matthew Hawkins
Kern Sibbald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: What I don't like about this is that some users (such as myself) don't want to subscribe to lists even to get help If you got software for free, and you can't even be bothered to do something as simple as subscribe to a free mailing list to receive

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the news

2005-05-18 Thread Michel Meyers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dan Langille wrote: Sorry, bad URL, try this instead, with instead of amp; http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230- 0.html?forumID=90threadID=173955start=0 [quote]I've looked at the Administration/Backup page on linux.org, and I've looked closely at

[Bacula-users] Upgraded to 1.36.3 , still Restores everything

2005-05-18 Thread Danie Theron
Hi , OK , upgraded to 1.36.3 ( thanks goes to Arno and Andrew). Did a test restore of a users directory , but still it seems bacula wants to restore everything. I'm running the following setup : Fedora Core 3 with RAID 5 (4 x 300GB Seagate Barracudas) , running /usr/bin/mysqladmin Ver 8.23

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

2005-05-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, On Wednesday 18 May 2005 09:37, Matthew Hawkins wrote: Kern Sibbald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: What I don't like about this is that some users (such as myself) don't want to subscribe to lists even to get help If you got software for free, and you can't even be bothered to do

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the news

2005-05-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 09:59, Michel Meyers wrote: Dan Langille wrote: Sorry, bad URL, try this instead, with instead of amp; http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230- 0.html?forumID=90threadID=173955start=0 [quote]I've looked at the Administration/Backup page on linux.org, and I've

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-(users|devel)] Spam on this list

2005-05-18 Thread Alan Brown
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Ivan Petrovich wrote: My subscription goes to address A where mail gets forwards to address B or C or ... depending on where I am at the time. If I need to make a posting, I would do it from, say, B, adding a reply-to line pointing to address A. But that fails to work with

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the news

2005-05-18 Thread Jo
Dan Langille wrote: On 17 May 2005 at 22:42, Dan Langille wrote: Well, not really in the news, but here's someone talking about it: http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230- 0.html?forumID=90amp;threadID=173955amp;start=0 Sorry, bad URL, try this instead, with instead of amp;

Re: [Bacula-users] Spam on this list

2005-05-18 Thread Matthew Hawkins
Kern Sibbald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Well, everyone is entitled to his opinion. And thanks to the internet, we can all express it ;) In my case, it is not that I cannot be bothered to subscribe as you seem suggest. This should be obvious from the amount of time and effort I put into

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgraded to 1.36.3 , still Restores everything

2005-05-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, It appears that you are *vastly* over complicating things. First, you only need one (the default) RestoreFiles job. Second, once you select the files, using the restore command and menu item 5 (if I remember right), which I don't see in the listing below, there should be little or no

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgraded to 1.36.3 , still Restores everything

2005-05-18 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello, It appears that you are *vastly* over complicating things. First, you only need one (the default) RestoreFiles job. Second, once you select the files, using the restore command and menu item 5 (if I remember right), which I don't see in the listing below, there

Re: [Bacula-users] [SOLVED] sqlite crash in bacula-dir-1.36.2-1mdk

2005-05-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, You need to be a bit more explicit about what is going on here. To the best of my knowledge Bacula does not use any temporary files other than what it writes the Working Directory. When Bacula is pruning, and during certain other operations, it will create temporary tables. It is my

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgraded to 1.36.3 , still Restores everything

2005-05-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 12:21, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello, It appears that you are *vastly* over complicating things. First, you only need one (the default) RestoreFiles job. Second, once you select the files, using the restore command and menu item 5 (if I

Re: [Bacula-users] [SOLVED] sqlite crash in bacula-dir-1.36.2-1mdk

2005-05-18 Thread Luca Berra
Kern Sibbald wrote: Now, if the user or the package creator makes the serious error of pointing the Working Directory to the same place where Bacula is stored, then you will definitely have a problem. the working directory points to /var/lib/bacula on default installs

[Bacula-users] urgent windows recover problem

2005-05-18 Thread Gerd Mueller
Hi list, we've got a urgent recover problem! While restoring files from a windows backup we always get the following problems: backup-sd: Got EOF at file 3 on device /var/backups/bacula/File, Volume diff0003 backup-sd: End of Volume at file 3 on device /var/backups/bacula/File, Volume diff0003

Re: [Bacula-users] urgent windows recover problem

2005-05-18 Thread Simon Weller
Tell us a little more about your machines. Are they Active Directory? Do you have similar problems restoring to linux machines? - Si On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 14:22 +0200, Gerd Mueller wrote: Hi list, we've got a urgent recover problem! While restoring files from a windows backup we always get

Re: [Bacula-users] urgent windows recover problem

2005-05-18 Thread Gerd Mueller
I try... All machines are runing with AD but bacula runs as system service. we are only making backups of windows machines :-( Recovery to different machines produce the same error. It also looks like the problems only happens with full backups :-( Best regards Gerd On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 07:32

[Bacula-users] Backup job is always running for the director. It is finish for the client

2005-05-18 Thread Evelyne Cangini
Hello, I runned a backup job. The size of the backup on appendable tape is in conformity so that I waited and the backup does not write anything more on this tape for a long time. The driver is ready. Status storage : Device /dev/st0 is mounted with Volume prod002 Total

Re: [Bacula-users] [SOLVED] sqlite crash in bacula-dir-1.36.2-1mdk

2005-05-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, (details at the end) I did an strace on bacula-dir, both from a directory not writable by bacula and from a directory writable by bacula, (I join the results) and bacula/sqlite does try to write a temp file in the current dir. I don't know whether this is a packaging pb, a Bacula pb, or

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Job Behaviour

2005-05-18 Thread Sean O'Grady
Well its good to know that Bacula will do what I need! Guess now I need to determine what I've done wrong in my configs ... I'm short forming all the config inforation to reduce the size of the e-mail but I can post my full configs if necessary. Anywhere where I have Maximum Concurrent Jobs I've

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Job Behaviour

2005-05-18 Thread Wilson Guerrero C.
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 23:46, Sean O'Grady wrote: Hello, I'm trying to get a better understanding of Concurrent Job behaviour and how it relates to multiple jobs going to a single Storage Device. The basics of my setup are multiple clients and a single Storage device. I specify that all

[Bacula-users] Re: urgent windows recover problem

2005-05-18 Thread Felix Schwarz
Hi, Gerd Mueller wrote: backup-sd: Ready to read from volume full0019 on device /var/backups/bacula/File. kliniken-data-fd: -rwxrwxrwx 1 00 19456 2005-02-24 09:21:41 /tmp/bacula-restores/e//Meddok/2004 - Entbindungsf[1]. Gnzburg.doc Are you shure that

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgraded to 1.36.3 , still Restores everything

2005-05-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, On Wednesday 18 May 2005 15:47, Danie Theron wrote: Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello, It appears that you are *vastly* over complicating things. First, you only need one (the default) RestoreFiles job. Second, once you select the files, using the restore command and menu item 5 (if I

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup job is always running for the director. It is finish for the client

2005-05-18 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, Evelyne Cangini wrote: Hello, I runned a backup job. The size of the backup on appendable tape is in conformity so that I waited and the backup does not write anything more on this tape for a long time. The driver is ready. Status storage : Device /dev/st0 is mounted with Volume prod002

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Job Behaviour

2005-05-18 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi. Sean O'Grady wrote: Well its good to know that Bacula will do what I need! Guess now I need to determine what I've done wrong in my configs ... I'm short forming all the config inforation to reduce the size of the e-mail but I can post my full configs if necessary. Anywhere where I have

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Job Behaviour

2005-05-18 Thread Sean O'Grady
Hi, After seeing two people respond saying that this was feasible and checking what Wilson had in his config against mine I did a little more digging. (Thanks Arno, your e-mail came in as I was writing this and confirmed the info about Pools. Also I'm running 1.36.3. ) I believe I have sorted

[Bacula-users] Re: Bacula-users -- confirmation of subscription -- request 339739

2005-05-18 Thread Mike Baroukh
Le Mercredi 18 Mai 2005 21:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a crit: Bacula-users -- confirmation of subscription -- request 339739 We have received a request from 82.235.218.191 for subscription of your email address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], to the bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net mailing list. To

Re: [Bacula-users] Speed of Windows FD

2005-05-18 Thread Martin Simmons
On Tue, 17 May 2005 18:54:01 -0400, Matthew Butt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Matt I have two identical Win 2k3 servers (Dell PowerEdge 2800, U320 RAID5, Matt dual P4 Xeon 2.8) that I need to backup data onto an FC3 server running Matt Bacula (P4 2.8GHz, USB2 HDD). All three machines have

RE: [Bacula-users] Speed of Windows FD

2005-05-18 Thread Matthew Butt
Matt I have two identical Win 2k3 servers (Dell PowerEdge 2800, U320 RAID5, Matt dual P4 Xeon 2.8) that I need to backup data onto an FC3 server running Matt Bacula (P4 2.8GHz, USB2 HDD). All three machines have Gigabit cards Matt running on a Gigabit switch with appropriate Cat5e

RE: [Bacula-users] Speed of Windows FD

2005-05-18 Thread Simon Weller
Have you checked network speed and duplex? - Si On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 17:09 -0400, Matthew Butt wrote: Matt I have two identical Win 2k3 servers (Dell PowerEdge 2800, U320 RAID5, Matt dual P4 Xeon 2.8) that I need to backup data onto an FC3 server running Matt Bacula (P4

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Job Behaviour

2005-05-18 Thread Sean O'Grady
Hi, Good points on a number of things but a few comments need to be made. 1) I'm not attempting to use spooling as a backup method that I want to restore from. I'm using spooling as its intended for, to avoid shoe-shining. I backup a number of clients servers at remote sites and their network

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Job Behaviour

2005-05-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 22:01, Sean O'Grady wrote: Hi, After seeing two people respond saying that this was feasible and checking what Wilson had in his config against mine I did a little more digging. (Thanks Arno, your e-mail came in as I was writing this and confirmed the info about

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Job Behaviour

2005-05-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 22:37, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hello, Sean O'Grady wrote: Hi, ... I believe I have sorted out what my issue with this is. As I didn't post my complete configs and only the ones that I thought would be relevant I ended up only giving half the picture. What was

[Bacula-users] Incremental Backups and 'new' old files

2005-05-18 Thread Ryan LeBlanc
We are running tests with Bacula to see if it will work in our environment. So far, we are very impressed! We have, however, run into a small problem. We do a full backup of a folder, and all files are copied as expected. We then put a file into this folder. It, however is an old file with a

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Job Behaviour

2005-05-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 23:24, Sean O'Grady wrote: Hi, Good points on a number of things but a few comments need to be made. 1) I'm not attempting to use spooling as a backup method that I want to restore from. I'm using spooling as its intended for, to avoid shoe-shining. I backup a

RE: [Bacula-users] Speed of Windows FD

2005-05-18 Thread Matthew Butt
Hi Simon, The bacula server is running at 1000Mbps, full duplex: tg3: eth0: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full duplex. tg3: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX. I'm trying to figure out at what speed/duplex the Windows server is but the switch it's plugged into shows that's it's also

Re: [Bacula-users] Incremental Backups and 'new' old files

2005-05-18 Thread Ryan LeBlanc
Arno, thank you for your response. Here are our details: Bacula version 1.36.3 server running on Linux kernel 2.4.26. It has ext2 partitions mounted (rw) The client is running Windows XP, no special mount options, just windows default. NTFS format on the partition Arno Lehmann wrote:

Re: [Bacula-users] Incremental Backups and 'new' old files

2005-05-18 Thread Arno Lehmann
Ryan LeBlanc wrote: Arno, thank you for your response. Here are our details: Bacula version 1.36.3 server running on Linux kernel 2.4.26. It has ext2 partitions mounted (rw) Ok, the server doesn't matter here, I think. The client is running Windows XP, no special mount options, just windows