On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to manually execute the algorithm that bacula uses to request a
tape for recycling, in order to predict which tapes will be recycled next?
I wish.
I had 20 purged tapes (out of 40 recent purges) loaded in the autochanger
last night
1: What is the current intended behaviour of update slots?
I thought it was intended to scan slots and drives without requiring a
tape drive unload in 1.38.
Currently it does - which means that changing out tape sets cannot be done
unless at least one drive is idle/blocked - problematic in
Hi folks,
I installed the scrip bellow to use 2 Dlt drives in the same director (one
HP VS80, the other Compaq DLT8000):
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=10684683
Than i went to the next step, label my first volumes using the two drives.
I was able to mount and label the
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 12:42, Alan Brown wrote:
1: What is the current intended behaviour of update slots?
The way it currently works.
I thought it was intended to scan slots and drives without requiring a
tape drive unload in 1.38.
I was going to remove the requirement to unload the
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I thought it was intended to scan slots and drives without requiring a
tape drive unload in 1.38.
I was going to remove the requirement to unload the drive, but the users
objected to that so it currently unloads the drive you specify.
OK.
Currently
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 15:03, Alan Brown wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I thought it was intended to scan slots and drives without requiring a
tape drive unload in 1.38.
I was going to remove the requirement to unload the drive, but the users
objected to that so it
I have an ongoing problem with the bacula-dir connecting to a specific
bacula-fd.
The bacula-dir is running on a SLES SuSE 9 server with bacula-1.36.3 and the
offending bacula-fd is running on a Win2003 server with bacula-fd 1.38.4
I know that the fd and dir are not supposed to be different
Help! Bacula is unable to use one of the two drives in our LTO2 (Dell
Powervault 132) autochanger.
I've been fine-tuning my bacula config, and went from having all backups going
to a default pool to separate pools for incrementals, full, and archive backups.
Previously, backups worked fine
Hi,
I've been using Bacula for two servers and some stationary computers for a
time now, and I'm very satisfied with it.
At this point I am considering setting Bacula to bacup a couple of laptops
also. This would work excellent when they are on our network, however when
they (or rather, their
HI Christopher,
I think if you set up one of these bad boys http://www.dyndns.com/ it
could work and then configure the director with a fully qualified name
instead of an IP. I think it should work.
-OralloOn 7/25/06, Christopher Rasch-Olsen Raa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,I've been using Bacula
Hi,
I've though about a setup such as that, but would that _really_ work? How
about firewalls it might be behind etc? I would still need a way to get
traffic through as far as I've understood...
- Christopher
PS: If top-posting is a big NO NO on this list, please feel free to say so.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bottom line now is that we've had HOW many e-mails go back and forth
without you sending any relevant or on-topic information? I'd still be
willing to take a crack at whatever is bothering you (despite the fact
that you suggested I was lacking in
On 25 Jul 2006 at 20:09, Christopher Rasch-Olsen Raa wrote:
Hi,
I've though about a setup such as that, but would that _really_ work? How
about firewalls it might be behind etc? I would still need a way to get
traffic through as far as I've understood...
- Christopher
PS: If
I haven't the foggiest idea which File Daemons it was unable to
communicate with. Can we please expand the error message to include
this information?
Begin forwarded message:
From: (Bacula) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: July 25, 2006 2:37:01 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bacula daemon
14 matches
Mail list logo
