[Bacula-users] problem with verify (sql query?)

2008-01-03 Thread Ralf Gross
Hi, I've a problem with some verify jobs. My normal backup/verify jobs are running fine. For my archive backups I created a extra psql db - I don't know if this makes a difference. # Catalog Catalog { Name = MyCatalog dbname = bacula; user = bacula; password = verysecret } # Archive

[Bacula-users] only public key access

2008-01-03 Thread Carles Pina i Estany
Hello, I have a short question. I only wonder if someone is using it or not (so, if Bacula supports it or doesn't support). We made some tests and we couldn't do but we will re-test. Question is: is it possible to cypher the data in bacula-fd (client), and this bacula-fd has only access to his

Re: [Bacula-users] problem with verify (sql query?)

2008-01-03 Thread Ralf Gross
Ralf Gross schrieb: 03-Jan 10:08 VU0EM005-sd JobId 39: Fatal error: read.c:139 Error sending to File daemon. ERR=Die Wartezeit für die Verbindung ist abgelaufen 03-Jan 10:08 VU0EM005-sd JobId 39: Error: bsock.c:306 Write error sending 65536 bytes to client:10.60.1.252:36643: ERR=Die Wartezeit

[Bacula-users] About FileSets

2008-01-03 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Hi all! I have the following two doubts related to FileSets that I would like to consult: * Is it possible to follow the symlinks? Searching in Google I found the option SymlinkDepth suggested in forums, but I didn't find it in the Bacula's manual and I don't know if it can be used with

[Bacula-users] File storage : Device is BLOCKED waiting for media

2008-01-03 Thread Sebastien Douche
Hi, I trying to add a remote file server (from default configuration on Debian Etch) : Storage { Name = backup-file Address = xxx SDPort = 9103 Password = Device = FileStorage Media Type = File } First run : 4 Increme Client1.2008-01-03_16.30.28 is waiting for an

[Bacula-users] SSL handshake failure in TLS setup

2008-01-03 Thread Sven Carstens
Hi, I'm trying to setup a TLS connection between one external FD and the director. Running status on the client results in 03-Jan 16:12 epistaxis-dir: ERROR in openssl.c:74 Connect failure: ERR=error:14094410:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert handshake failure 03-Jan 16:12 epistaxis-dir:

Re: [Bacula-users] only public key access

2008-01-03 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 03.01.2008 14:19,, Carles Pina i Estany wrote:: Hello, I have a short question. I only wonder if someone is using it or not (so, if Bacula supports it or doesn't support). We made some tests and we couldn't do but we will re-test. Question is: is it possible to cypher the data in

Re: [Bacula-users] only public key access

2008-01-03 Thread Carles Pina i Estany
Hi! On Jan/03/2008, Arno Lehmann wrote: 03.01.2008 14:19,, Carles Pina i Estany wrote:: Hello, I have a short question. I only wonder if someone is using it or not (so, if Bacula supports it or doesn't support). We made some tests and we couldn't do but we will re-test.

Re: [Bacula-users] File storage : Device is BLOCKED waiting for media

2008-01-03 Thread John Drescher
On Jan 3, 2008 10:39 AM, Sebastien Douche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I trying to add a remote file server (from default configuration on Debian Etch) : Storage { Name = backup-file Address = xxx SDPort = 9103 Password = Device = FileStorage Media Type = File }

Re: [Bacula-users] SSL handshake failure in TLS setup

2008-01-03 Thread Landon Fuller
On Jan 3, 2008, at 07:49, Sven Carstens wrote: 03-Jan 16:12 epistaxis-dir: ERROR in openssl.c:74 Connect failure: ERR=error:14094410:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert handshake failure 03-Jan 16:12 epistaxis-dir: *Console*.2008-01-03_16.12.28 Fatal error: TLS negotiation failed

Re: [Bacula-users] File storage : Device is BLOCKED waiting for media

2008-01-03 Thread Sebastien Douche
On Jan 3, 2008 6:50 PM, John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there any labeled volumes on /srv/backup for the pool that the current backup is running? No, but If understand correctly the manual, a good practice is to waiting the message for creating a volume. Do you have autolabeling

Re: [Bacula-users] follow-up to terminated job... post

2008-01-03 Thread Martin Simmons
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 08:39:19 -0800 (PST), David Gardner said: Does the following make sense to anyone on this list: *umount DAT72 3935 Device DAT72 (/dev/tape) is blocked for unknown reason. *mount DAT72 3905 Bizarre wait state 7 State 7 means Despooling -- i.e. multiple writes I think.

Re: [Bacula-users] only public key access

2008-01-03 Thread Landon Fuller
On Jan 3, 2008, at 05:19, Carles Pina i Estany wrote: Hello, I have a short question. I only wonder if someone is using it or not (so, if Bacula supports it or doesn't support). We made some tests and we couldn't do but we will re-test. Question is: is it possible to cypher the data in

Re: [Bacula-users] only public key access

2008-01-03 Thread Carles Pina i Estany
Hello, On Jan/03/2008, Landon Fuller wrote: On Jan 3, 2008, at 05:19, Carles Pina i Estany wrote: Hello, I have a short question. I only wonder if someone is using it or not (so, if Bacula supports it or doesn't support). We made some tests and we couldn't do but we will re-test.

Re: [Bacula-users] (no subject)

2008-01-03 Thread Frank Sweetser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1018 Yeah, seems to be the same problem. I haven't actually watched to see if the other drive is requesting the tape at the same time, but I assumed that it was something like that. Its also at the beginning of the jobs, so that

[Bacula-users] Using bacula over Internet

2008-01-03 Thread nickilo
Hello I wish to know what is the most secure solution for using bacula over the internet. I have seen bacula is able to use tls connection and tcp-wrappers. Is this solution strong enough ? Is there a more secure solution ? It is possible to use ssh tunnel, but it is really painfull to

Re: [Bacula-users] Using bacula over Internet

2008-01-03 Thread Dan Langille
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello I wish to know what is the most secure solution for using bacula over the internet. I have seen bacula is able to use tls connection and tcp-wrappers. Is this solution strong enough ? Strong-enough is hard to define. It is at least as strong as https,

Re: [Bacula-users] Using bacula over Internet

2008-01-03 Thread Terry L. Inzauro
Dan Langille wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello I wish to know what is the most secure solution for using bacula over the internet. I have seen bacula is able to use tls connection and tcp-wrappers. Is this solution strong enough ? Strong-enough is hard to define. It is at least as

Re: [Bacula-users] Using bacula over Internet

2008-01-03 Thread Frank Sweetser
Terry L. Inzauro wrote: Dan Langille wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello I wish to know what is the most secure solution for using bacula over the internet. I have seen bacula is able to use tls connection and tcp-wrappers. Is this solution strong enough ? Strong-enough is hard to

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula centos rpms

2008-01-03 Thread Mark Nienberg
Dave wrote: Hello, What is the latest bacula rpms available for centos 5.x? Right now i'm running the client only on a few machines and that's at 2.2.4-1 i'm wondering if first there's something later and second if so, if there are any new features clientside that would justify

Re: [Bacula-users] SSL handshake failure in TLS setup

2008-01-03 Thread Sven Carstens
Am Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2008 schrieb Landon Fuller: On Jan 3, 2008, at 07:49, Sven Carstens wrote: 03-Jan 16:12 epistaxis-dir: ERROR in openssl.c:74 Connect failure: ERR=error:14094410:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert handshake failure 03-Jan 16:12 epistaxis-dir: