I've done some modifications.
Schedule {
Name = "Default"
Run = Level=Full Pool=Tape 1st sun at 2:05
Run = Level=Incremental Pool=File mon-fri at 2:05
}
JobDefs {
Name = "Windows 2008"
Schedule = "Default"
Messages = Standard
Priority = 10
Write Bootstrap = "/var/bacula/%c.bsr"
Phil Stracchino schrieb:
> > The /usr slice is about 4.8G, and shouldn't be changing-- at least
> > not at the tune of 51M every night.
>
>
> "Shouldn't" is a powerful word. You might want to test the theory by
> doing something like this:
>
> find /usr /opt/bacula/bin -mtime -1 -ls
>
> to lis
--- On Wed, 4/21/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> From: Phil Stracchino
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Using removable SATA disks as media
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 5:53 PM
> On 04/21/10 19:42, John Drescher
> wrote:
> >> 19-Apr 23:10 backula-sd JobI
On 04/21/10 19:42, John Drescher wrote:
>> 19-Apr 23:10 backula-sd JobId 183: Job write elapsed time = 00:00:01,
>> Transfer rate = 51.14 M Bytes/second
>> 19-Apr 23:10 backula-dir JobId 183: Bacula backula-dir 5.0.1 (24Feb10):
>> 19-Apr-2010 23:10:04
>> Build OS: x86_64-unknown-li
On 04/21/10 19:18, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> --- On Wed, 4/21/10, John Drescher wrote:
>
>> From: John Drescher
>> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Using removable SATA disks as media
>> To: "Joseph Spenner"
>> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 12:10 PM
>> On W
> 19-Apr 23:10 backula-sd JobId 183: Job write elapsed time = 00:00:01,
> Transfer rate = 51.14 M Bytes/second
> 19-Apr 23:10 backula-dir JobId 183: Bacula backula-dir 5.0.1 (24Feb10):
> 19-Apr-2010 23:10:04
> Build OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu redhat
> JobId: 183
--- On Wed, 4/21/10, John Drescher wrote:
> From: John Drescher
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Using removable SATA disks as media
> To: "Joseph Spenner"
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 12:10 PM
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:08 PM, John
> Drescher
> wro
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:29:56 -0500, Jon Schewe said:
>
> I have most of my clients setup with encryption. One is not setup with
> encryption. The one without encryption died and I need to restore the
> data. So I'm restoring to one of the clients configured with encryption.
> I'm getting a b
Hi,
We use bacula in our company for all server backups. The backup portion is
working just fine no errors on backing up (connects good to the SD).
However, when I am doing a test restore I get the following error. I think
it is strange that it can connect to the SD for backups, but not for
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:30:01 +1000, Norberto Meijome said:
>
> Hi,
> I just wanted to confirm, for my own benefit :), that when a volume is
> recycled ( as per the 'volume Retention' settings), all Job and File records
> contained in that volume are gone.
>
> With the caveat that if the vo
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:54:52 +0200, Matija Nalis said:
>
> OK, everything is understandable so far. So, I recon I'd restore File
> entries by bscaning tapes (which I never used before).
>
> So I've executed (with right tapes loaded in right drives according
> to bscan outputs) the following
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:08 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>> Here are the file sizes (in date order):
>>
>> 7009019184 Apr 14 23:21 disk_0003
>> 51149798 Apr 15 23:10 disk_0004
>> 51159533 Apr 16 23:10 disk_0005
>> 51167844 Apr 17 23:10 disk_0006
>> 51177531 Apr 18 23:10 disk_0001
>> 51182974
> Here are the file sizes (in date order):
>
> 7009019184 Apr 14 23:21 disk_0003
> 51149798 Apr 15 23:10 disk_0004
> 51159533 Apr 16 23:10 disk_0005
> 51167844 Apr 17 23:10 disk_0006
> 51177531 Apr 18 23:10 disk_0001
> 51182974 Apr 19 23:10 disk_0002
>
> There shouldn't be 51M+ of updates
--- On Wed, 4/21/10, John Drescher wrote:
> From: John Drescher
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Using removable SATA disks as media
> To: "Joseph Spenner"
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 11:38 AM
> > 17-Apr 23:05 backula-dir JobId
> 175: Start Backup Jo
> 17-Apr 23:05 backula-dir JobId 175: Start Backup JobId 175,
> Job=DefaultBackupClient.2010-04-17_23.05.00_23
> 17-Apr 23:05 backula-dir JobId 175: Max configured use duration exceeded.
> Marking Volume "disk_0005" as Used.
> 17-Apr 23:05 backula-dir JobId 175: Recycled volume "disk_0006"
> 17-A
--- On Wed, 4/14/10, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> From: Joseph Spenner
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Using removable SATA disks as media
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 7:04 PM
> --- On Wed, 4/14/10, John Drescher
>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > OK, my next b
On 04/21/10 09:00, Sorix wrote:
>
> Hello.
> I've tried to use such backup scheme:
>
> - Full backups => Tape device
> - Incremental backups => HDD
>
> But always when i'm trying to start incremental job backups after doing full,
> i'm getting:
>
>> No prior Full backup Job record found.
>> N
John, thank you very much for your help. Worked perfectly.
+--
|This was sent by lwein...@yahoo.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--
Hi,
I've this problem under FreeBSD:
http://adsm.org/lists/html/Bacula-users/2010-03/msg00027.html
Is there already a patch for it?
Thanks in advance,
Efren
--
___
Ba
On 22 April 2010 01:10, John Drescher wrote:
> > I am using Bacula 5.0.0 on Centos 5.4 64bit.
> >
> > When I issue 'status storage=XYZ', where XYZ is a storage device managed
> by
> > StorageDaemonA , what I get is information about all storage devices
> defined
> > for StorageDaemonA. Is this ho
John Drescher wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> 2010/4/21 John Drescher :
Can I delete jobs with theis files besides their database records?
>
> Not if other jobs are on the same volume and you do not want to erase
> the whole volume.
This behaviour results
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> 2010/4/21 John Drescher :
>>> Can I delete jobs with theis files besides their database records?
Not if other jobs are on the same volume and you do not want to erase
the whole volume.
John
> Can I delete jobs with theis files besides their database records?
>
Storage will only be reduced with 5.0.1 and the action on purge feature.
http://sourceforge.net/apps/wordpress/bacula/2010/02/01/new-actiononpurge-feature/
This assumes that you deleted all jobs from a volume. If not the
volu
Hi,
Can I delete jobs with theis files besides their database records?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
Sergio Belkin -
--
> I am using Bacula 5.0.0 on Centos 5.4 64bit.
>
> When I issue 'status storage=XYZ', where XYZ is a storage device managed by
> StorageDaemonA , what I get is information about all storage devices defined
> for StorageDaemonA. Is this how it's supposed to be ?
>
This is how it is supposed to be. I
Hello.
I've tried to use such backup scheme:
- Full backups => Tape device
- Incremental backups => HDD
But always when i'm trying to start incremental job backups after doing full,
i'm getting:
> No prior Full backup Job record found.
> No prior or suitable Full backup found in catalog. Doin
Hi, I had a long retention on jobs (3 years) and a short on files
(1 month). I usually run full backups monthly, but few of those failed
(due to time restrictions and other issues). I also run Differential
backups weekly, so all data seems to be on tapes - it just that the
File records expired.
S
Hi List,
I am looking for bacula-client installation on ubuntu 9.04. Can someone help
me on this.
/\
dE
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
http
Spencer Marshall schrieb:
>
> Has anyone else experienced problems with "Packet size too big" in
> 5.0.1? I was running a Level=VolumeToCatalog at the time. I found
> bug an old bug http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1061 which
> appeared to have the same problems. I removed the "Heartbeat
> In
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:46:33AM -0500, Jon Schewe wrote:
> > http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?id=faq#my_backup_starts_but_dies_after_a_while_with_connection_reset_by_peer_error
> >
> > [1] It actually tries that at one point in src/lib/bsock.c if
> > TCP_KEEPIDLE support is detected, but it f
Has anyone else experienced problems with "Packet size too big" in 5.0.1? I
was running a Level=VolumeToCatalog at the time. I found bug an old bug
http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1061 which appeared to have the same
problems. I removed the "Heartbeat Interval" from the fd, and it ran t
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:47:56 +0200, Robert Oschwald said:
>
> if we rewind manually, the same problem occurs.
> Bacula was not writing during reboot (reboot was during the day, all
> backup jobs run during the night, duplicates occur approx. at 11PM)
> Currently, the Drive only works if we l
Norberto,
if we rewind manually, the same problem occurs.
Bacula was not writing during reboot (reboot was during the day, all backup
jobs run during the night, duplicates occur approx. at 11PM)
Currently, the Drive only works if we leave the tape as_is during backups (we
remove the tape weekly
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 01:09:45PM -0600, Jason Hill wrote:
> I read through that, and looked at my indexes on the File table and it
> doesn't appear as if I have superfluous indexes. The doc mentions:
>
> "you need to drop all the indexes from File table except the primary
> key and indexes on (
On 14 April 2010 16:32, Robert Oschwald wrote:
> Bacula works perfectly so far.
> The only serious problem I have is End of Tape detection.
> E.g. if I need to reboot the backup server, the current tape will be
> rewinded.
> The next backup job then seems not to find the end of the last backup an
Hi,
I just wanted to confirm, for my own benefit :), that when a volume is
recycled ( as per the 'volume Retention' settings), all Job and File records
contained in that volume are gone.
With the caveat that if the volume is not overwritten by a subsequent job,
one can use bscan to restore this i
Hi everyone,
I am using Bacula 5.0.0 on Centos 5.4 64bit.
When I issue 'status storage=XYZ', where XYZ is a storage device managed by
StorageDaemonA , what I get is information about all storage devices defined
for StorageDaemonA. Is this how it's supposed to be ?
For example, below is the outp
37 matches
Mail list logo
