Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-10 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 10.03.20 um 15:13 schrieb Martin Simmons: >> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:26:20 +0100, Pierre Bernhardt said: > I suggest checking the bacula log and the syslog to see what it reports when > the tape is marked as full. Thats a problem. I've send only mails in the past. Only after upgrade in feb 20

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-10 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 10.03.20 um 09:26 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: > Todo: Check a backup so the drive 2 will be used instead of drive 1. > Maybe since 2020 the other drive is used. > (How can I check it which drive index has been used before and since > 2020 ? Is there a field which shows me the drive index in the db

Re: [Bacula-users] New tape drive

2020-03-10 Thread Steven Hammond
Ok, I didn't know if it was being stored internally in the database for the tapes (e.g., tape volume Daily-1 was associated in the catalog with storage device LTO-5).  Thanks. Steven Hammond On 3/10/2020 12:38 PM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: On 11/03/2020 02:26, Steven Hammond wrote: We are curren

Re: [Bacula-users] New tape drive

2020-03-10 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
On 11/03/2020 02:26, Steven Hammond wrote: We are currently using a LTO-5 drive.  We are upgrading to a LTO-7 drive.  I noticed the directive in our pools STORAGE=LTO-5. I'd like the existing pools to use LTO-7 (since it can still read LTO-5 tapes).  Can I just change the directive in the pool

[Bacula-users] New tape drive

2020-03-10 Thread Steven Hammond
We are currently using a LTO-5 drive.  We are upgrading to a LTO-7 drive.  I noticed the directive in our pools STORAGE=LTO-5. I'd like the existing pools to use LTO-7 (since it can still read LTO-5 tapes).  Can I just change the directive in the pool to use our new LTO-7 tape drive OR will thi

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-10 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:26:20 +0100, Pierre Bernhardt said: > > Hello, > > since beginning of this year a tape issue has been arrived my backups. > All my LTO-4 Tapes will not fill any more to the ~ 760 GiByte than > before. Only ~ 510-580 GiByte will be stored on the tapes which is > shown

[Bacula-users] Bacula Release 9.6.3

2020-03-10 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, This is to announce that we have released Bacula version 9.6.3 to Source Forge and to www.bacula.org.  This version primarily has fixed a number of incorrect copyrights.  If you are using Bacula 9.6.0, 9.6.1, or 9.6.2, we recommend that you update, but it i not required.  The following

Re: [Bacula-users] Baculum api installs, but throws Error 1000

2020-03-10 Thread Neil MacGregor
Thank you, Marcin, you were absolutely right. I wiped my install & started again with the default version of PostgreSQL, and it works perfectly. You went above and beyond the call on this one! On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 8:52 PM Marcin Haba wrote: > Hello Neil, > > Thanks for reporting this problem

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-10 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 10.03.20 um 09:26 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: > (How can I check it which drive index has been used before and since > 2020 ? Is there a field which shows me the drive index in the db?) Ok, found a field but it is ever filled by 0: bacula=> select volumename,deviceid,volbytes from media where vol

[Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-10 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Hello, since beginning of this year a tape issue has been arrived my backups. All my LTO-4 Tapes will not fill any more to the ~ 760 GiByte than before. Only ~ 510-580 GiByte will be stored on the tapes which is shown by the list volume command. The latest volume with > 720 GiByte has to been writ