Re: [Bacula-users] Bacularis: set of rights for tape operators

Am 12.06.24 um 17:09 schrieb Marcin Haba: Hello Stefan, Thanks for your question. It showed me that it might be good to add descriptions for the resources available for each role and probably a new section in the documentation that describes it. For the question about setting access for the

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacularis: set of rights for tape operators

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 10:02, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 12.06.24 um 17:09 schrieb Marcin Haba: > > Hello Stefan, > > > > Thanks for your question. It showed me that it might be good to > > add descriptions for the resources available for each role and probably > > a new section in the docu

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacularis: set of rights for tape operators

Am 13.06.24 um 10:24 schrieb Marcin Haba: On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 10:02, Stefan G. Weichinger > wrote: I don't see how to assign the ACL to that user, sry  In the create API basic user window there is an option with label: "Create dedicated Bconsole config file" Whe

Re: [Bacula-users] Again LTO9 and performances...

interested as well, I need to speedup my weekly/monthly FULL runs (with LTO6, though: way slower anyway). Shouldn't the file daemon do multiple jobs in parallel? To tape you can only write ONE stream of data. To the spooling disk there could be more than one stream. Yes, that seems wrong:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacularis: set of rights for tape operators

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 10:46, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 13.06.24 um 10:24 schrieb Marcin Haba: > > On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 10:02, Stefan G. Weichinger > > wrote: > > I don't see how to assign the ACL to that user, sry > > > > > > In the create API basic user wi

[Bacula-users] LTO-8 tape report error

This was working until yesterday when I rebooted the Bacula/LTO server and now gives: - sg_raw -o - -r 1024 -t 60 -v /dev/sg1 8c 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 00 00 cdb to send: [8c 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacularis: set of rights for tape operators

Am 13.06.24 um 12:44 schrieb Marcin Haba: You don't need to restart anything. Are you sure that you set all CommandAcl directive values in the Console ACL? They should be one command per one CommandAcl field: CommandAcl = gui CommandAcl = .api CommandAcl = .status CommandAcl = .storage Comman

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacularis: set of rights for tape operators

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 13:35, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 13.06.24 um 12:44 schrieb Marcin Haba: > > > You don't need to restart anything. Are you sure that you set all > > CommandAcl directive values in the Console ACL? They should be one > > command per one CommandAcl field: > > > > Comman

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-8 tape report error

On 13/06/2024 21:12, Adam Weremczuk wrote: This was working until yesterday when I rebooted the Bacula/LTO server and now gives: -  sg_raw -o - -r 1024 -t 60 -v /dev/sg1 8c 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 04 00 00 00

Re: [Bacula-users] Again LTO9 and performances...

On 13/06/2024 20:12, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: interested as well, I need to speedup my weekly/monthly FULL runs (with LTO6, though: way slower anyway). Shouldn't the file daemon do multiple jobs in parallel? To tape you can only write ONE stream of data. To the spooling disk there could

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacularis: set of rights for tape operators

Am 13.06.24 um 14:05 schrieb Marcin Haba: This is wrong because if multiple commands are closed in one big quotes, it is treated as one command that does not exist, so it causes no access to anything. You need to write it as this (without quotes):   CommandAcl = gui, .api, .status, .storage

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-8 tape report error

1. Are you suggesting running a round with a cleaning cartridge? The drive is not asking for it (by showing "C"). 2. I don't get what you mean. This is a new thread. On 13/06/2024 13:07, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: Any idea what's going on? 1 - Clean your heads. 2 - Don't hijack threads, start

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-8 tape report error

On 13/06/2024 22:43, Adam Weremczuk wrote: 1. Are you suggesting running a round with a cleaning cartridge? The drive is not asking for it (by showing "C"). I've seen HP drives throw these errors which go away after a clean. It may be an indicator that the drive is dying or the head has gone

Re: [Bacula-users] Again LTO9 and performances...

On 6/13/24 08:13, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: On 13/06/2024 20:12, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: interested as well, I need to speedup my weekly/monthly FULL runs (with LTO6, though: way slower anyway). Shouldn't the file daemon do multiple jobs in parallel? To tape you can only write ONE stream