I have been updating with each of the new 1.38.3's when they come out,
but I am still having an issue with "waiting to reserve a device". The
first 1.38.3 update allowed it to perform backups, but it now waits
exactly 30 minutes before starting. When the job is scheduled to
start, it immedia
On Friday 16 December 2005 10:02, Volker Dierks wrote:
> Hello Kern,
>
> do you think that this problem also affects me? My plan was to test
> the beta (released 10. Dec) and two drives today with a new tape set.
Quite posibbly -- try the 14 Dec 05 version instead ...
>
> To give you a little remin
Hello Kern,
do you think that this problem also affects me? My plan was to test
the beta (released 10. Dec) and two drives today with a new tape set.
To give you a little reminder:
A HP 2/20 Library with 10 tapes on the left side in pool DRIVE-1 and
10 tapes on the right side in pool DRIVE-2. I'
Hello Rick,
Thanks for the debug output. I think I have now found the problem in the
algorithm at least the problem that is hitting you. This time, I'm 100% that
I have found at least one major problem.
I'm going to run code through all my tests here on two machines, then on
Solaris and FreeB
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 04:22, Rick Knight wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >If you are able to reproduce this easily, could you turn on level 100 by
> >putting -d100 on the command line when you start it, then capture the
> > output. This may help me understand what is going on.
Hello,
Please copy the list ...
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 04:12, Rick Knight wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >If you are able to reproduce this easily, could you turn on level 100 by
> >putting -d100 on the command line when you start it, then capture the
> > output. This may hel
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
If you are able to reproduce this easily, could you turn on level 100 by
putting -d100 on the command line when you start it, then capture the output.
This may help me understand what is going on.
I've tried everything I can to duplicate this, but all my tests run
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
If you are able to reproduce this easily, could you turn on level 100 by
putting -d100 on the command line when you start it, then capture the output.
This may help me understand what is going on.
I've tried everything I can to duplicate this, but all my tests run
Hello,
If you are able to reproduce this easily, could you turn on level 100 by
putting -d100 on the command line when you start it, then capture the output.
This may help me understand what is going on.
I've tried everything I can to duplicate this, but all my tests run fine.
Hmmm. Normally,
I am also getting this error since upgrading to 1.38 from the 1.36
branch... been trying to figure out why for a few days now.
I am also running slackware 10... I wonder if this is related. Not
running 2.4 kernel though, running 2.6.11.12 right now. I am backing
up to disk, not tapes. Manu
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 19:44, Richard W. Knight wrote:
...
> >>
> >>I just got another job log email. Something I noticed is a clock
> >>difference between the Director and File daemons. The two lines below
> >>are from this mornings log (also attached). Could that be causing a
> >>problem?
>
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 17:54, Richard W. Knight wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 13:43, Rick Knight wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
On Monday 12 December 2005 19:35, Richard W. Knight wrote:
Hi all,
A coup
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 17:54, Richard W. Knight wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >On Tuesday 13 December 2005 13:43, Rick Knight wrote:
> >>Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >>>Hello,
> >>>
> >>>On Monday 12 December 2005 19:35, Richard W. Knight wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A couple of weeks ago I upg
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 13:43, Rick Knight wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
On Monday 12 December 2005 19:35, Richard W. Knight wrote:
Hi all,
A couple of weeks ago I upgraded my Bacula installation from 1.34 to
1.38.1. I made a few other changes at t
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 13:43, Rick Knight wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >On Monday 12 December 2005 19:35, Richard W. Knight wrote:
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>A couple of weeks ago I upgraded my Bacula installation from 1.34 to
> >>1.38.1. I made a few other changes at the same time a
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
On Monday 12 December 2005 19:35, Richard W. Knight wrote:
Hi all,
A couple of weeks ago I upgraded my Bacula installation from 1.34 to
1.38.1. I made a few other changes at the same time and everything has
been working well since. Yesterday I decided to upgrade
Hello,
On Monday 12 December 2005 19:35, Richard W. Knight wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A couple of weeks ago I upgraded my Bacula installation from 1.34 to
> 1.38.1. I made a few other changes at the same time and everything has
> been working well since. Yesterday I decided to upgrade to 1.38.3. I
> bui
Hi all,
A couple of weeks ago I upgraded my Bacula installation from 1.34 to
1.38.1. I made a few other changes at the same time and everything has
been working well since. Yesterday I decided to upgrade to 1.38.3. I
built from source using the same configuration options that I used to
build
18 matches
Mail list logo
