Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-15 Thread Alan Brown
On 15/03/2020 11:24, Pierre Bernhardt wrote: > >> I will now try to clean the drive with a fresh cleaning tape and use btape >> again for a test. I think I will not get big different result, but it's >> a try. > This does not has been helped. So I will disable the drive for write so only > the oth

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-15 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 14.03.20 um 04:46 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: > Am 13.03.20 um 08:28 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: >> Am 10.03.20 um 20:27 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: >>> Write failed at block 8758373. stat=-1 ERR=Auf dem Gerät ist kein >>> Speicherplatz mehr verfügbar >>> btape: btape.c:411-0 Volume bytes=565.0 GB. W

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-14 Thread kern
, one cleaning did not resolve a tape proble I had on an LTO-4 drve).Best regards,KernSent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Original message From: Pierre Bernhardt Date: 3/14/20 04:54 (GMT+01:00) To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-13 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 13.03.20 um 08:28 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: > Am 10.03.20 um 20:27 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: >> Write failed at block 8758373. stat=-1 ERR=Auf dem Gerät ist kein >> Speicherplatz mehr verfügbar >> btape: btape.c:411-0 Volume bytes=565.0 GB. Write rate = 25.08 MB/s >> btape: btape.c:612-0 Wrote

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-13 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 13.03.20 um 15:18 schrieb Sebastian Suchanek: > Am 10.03.2020 um 09:26 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: > >> since beginning of this year a tape issue has been arrived my backups. >> All my LTO-4 Tapes will not fill any more to the ~ 760 GiByte than >> before. Only ~ 510-580 GiByte will be stored on t

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-13 Thread Alan Brown
On 13/03/2020 12:37, Martin Simmons wrote: >> >> So it looks really there is really an issue on the drive 0 or the connection >> path. >> I will wait for the end of the both tests >> (btape on drive 1 and backup test on drive 0) > You could also try running the HP Library and Tape Tools: > > https

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-13 Thread Sebastian Suchanek
Am 10.03.2020 um 09:26 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: > since beginning of this year a tape issue has been arrived my backups. > All my LTO-4 Tapes will not fill any more to the ~ 760 GiByte than > before. Only ~ 510-580 GiByte will be stored on the tapes which is > shown by the list volume command. L

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-13 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:28:13 +0100, Pierre Bernhardt said: > > Am 10.03.20 um 20:27 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: > > Write failed at block 8758373. stat=-1 ERR=Auf dem Gerät ist kein > > Speicherplatz mehr verfügbar > > btape: btape.c:411-0 Volume bytes=565.0 GB. Write rate = 25.08 MB/s > > bt

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-13 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 10.03.20 um 20:27 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: > Write failed at block 8758373. stat=-1 ERR=Auf dem Gerät ist kein > Speicherplatz mehr verfügbar > btape: btape.c:411-0 Volume bytes=565.0 GB. Write rate = 25.08 MB/s > btape: btape.c:612-0 Wrote 1 EOF to "HP Ultrium 4-1" > (/dev/tape/by-id/scsi-HU

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-12 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 10.03.20 um 20:50 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: > Am 10.03.20 um 15:13 schrieb Martin Simmons: >> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:26:20 +0100, Pierre Bernhardt said: >> Also, you might try using smartctl to get information about error rates from >> the drive. Something like: >> >> smartctl -a -d scsi -T per

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-10 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 10.03.20 um 15:13 schrieb Martin Simmons: >> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:26:20 +0100, Pierre Bernhardt said: > I suggest checking the bacula log and the syslog to see what it reports when > the tape is marked as full. Thats a problem. I've send only mails in the past. Only after upgrade in feb 20

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-10 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 10.03.20 um 09:26 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: > Todo: Check a backup so the drive 2 will be used instead of drive 1. > Maybe since 2020 the other drive is used. > (How can I check it which drive index has been used before and since > 2020 ? Is there a field which shows me the drive index in the db

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-10 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:26:20 +0100, Pierre Bernhardt said: > > Hello, > > since beginning of this year a tape issue has been arrived my backups. > All my LTO-4 Tapes will not fill any more to the ~ 760 GiByte than > before. Only ~ 510-580 GiByte will be stored on the tapes which is > shown

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-10 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 10.03.20 um 09:26 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: > (How can I check it which drive index has been used before and since > 2020 ? Is there a field which shows me the drive index in the db?) Ok, found a field but it is ever filled by 0: bacula=> select volumename,deviceid,volbytes from media where vol

[Bacula-users] Tape issue: less size than before for LTO-4 tapes

2020-03-10 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Hello, since beginning of this year a tape issue has been arrived my backups. All my LTO-4 Tapes will not fill any more to the ~ 760 GiByte than before. Only ~ 510-580 GiByte will be stored on the tapes which is shown by the list volume command. The latest volume with > 720 GiByte has to been writ