Re: [Bacula-users] Troubles with AWS [Possibly solved]

2023-01-18 Thread Chris Wilkinson
This response from Backblaze. The SD would have to retry but that didn't seem to happen in the example I posted, it just moved on to the next part file. "The "No Tomes Available" error refers to a potential and common http 500/503 response from our api. This error indicates that after the client

Re: [Bacula-users] Troubles with AWS [Possibly solved]

2023-01-17 Thread Chris Wilkinson
Backblaze provides an integration checklist for developers. https://www.backblaze.com/b2/docs/integration_checklist.html I’m wondering if anyone could comment on whether the S3 driver is compliant with this? I’ve asked the

Re: [Bacula-users] Troubles with AWS [Possibly solved]

2023-01-16 Thread Chris Wilkinson
I don't specify "max concurrent uploads" so it defaults to 3 per manual. I have differing max part size for the jobs but the ones that frequently fail are 500Mb. I'm bandwidth limited to 6MB/sec so I don't see any benefit from trying to run uploads concurrently. My largest backup is 350GB that

Re: [Bacula-users] Troubles with AWS [Possibly solved]

2023-01-16 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 1/13/23 18:26, Andrea Venturoli wrote: Then I upgraded every package (don't think it matters, still no harm) and now I'm trying with "cloud upload" manually. I'll see how this goes. Still troublesome, but now the error is more verbose: 3000 Cloud Upload: Full0116/part.195 state=error