On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 11:34 +1100, James Harper wrote:
I've still got a couple of minor issues with restoring a Windows
system
while using a BartPE CD:
* Specifying the target for the restore. The system currently has the
following partitions:
Part 1 - 100G Primary partition
Onsdag 17 januar 2007 22:11 skrev Dwight Tovey:
I've still got a couple of minor issues with restoring a Windows system
while using a BartPE CD:
* Specifying the target for the restore. The system currently has the
following partitions:
Part 1 - 100G Primary partition defined as C:
On Jan 17, 2007, at 3:11 PM, Dwight Tovey wrote:
I've still got a couple of minor issues with restoring a Windows
system
while using a BartPE CD:
* Specifying the target for the restore. The system currently has the
following partitions:
Part 1 - 100G Primary partition defined as
The other option that came to mind would be to recover the C
partition, boot the machine into Windows, finish creating the
remaining partition(s) and restore the balance of the machine while
in Windows. After all, we now have a nice wintel version of bacula we
can use.
If the machine
On Jan 17, 2007, at 6:37 PM, James Harper wrote:
The other option that came to mind would be to recover the C
partition, boot the machine into Windows, finish creating the
remaining partition(s) and restore the balance of the machine while
in Windows. After all, we now have a nice
It should do. Even Backup Exec will not restore the exchange and SQL
databases (except I think the actual backup exec database itself) as
part of the disaster recovery restore. You have to restore the disk
volumes and system state and then boot up and restore the databases.
Ah
No, not kidding. I agree, it is difficult to tell most of the time in
email.
I've been using Backup Exec for years. Once Symantec bought out
Veritas, things have gone decidedly south with the product. A crying
shame. Same thing happened when they acquired Powerquest's product
line of disc
Howdy,
I am running bacula-dir version 1.38.11 (28 June 2006) on FreeBSD
6.1-RELEASE. I am fairly new to Bacula, and have just configured two Unix
machines and one Windows XP machine with bacula-fd. Backups have been
running consistently for several weeks now without issue to a USB2.0
attached
Hi,
On 9/15/2006 9:38 PM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
Howdy,
I am running bacula-dir version 1.38.11 (28 June 2006) on FreeBSD
6.1-RELEASE. I am fairly new to Bacula, and have just configured two Unix
machines and one Windows XP machine with bacula-fd. Backups have been
running consistently
On 15 Sep 2006 at 22:22, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
On 9/15/2006 9:38 PM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
Howdy,
I am running bacula-dir version 1.38.11 (28 June 2006) on FreeBSD
6.1-RELEASE. I am fairly new to Bacula, and have just configured two Unix
machines and one Windows XP machine
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Dan Langille wrote:
Large volumes on *disk* slow down the restore if you're trying to get
one file back. GREATLY. Try it. I suggest smaller volumes. e.g.
2GB.
Yup, not only have I tried it, but it was question 1) in my original post.
It doesn't make any sense,
On Friday 15 September 2006 23:20, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Dan Langille wrote:
Large volumes on *disk* slow down the restore if you're trying to get
one file back. GREATLY. Try it. I suggest smaller volumes. e.g.
2GB.
Yup, not only have I tried it, but it was
12 matches
Mail list logo
