Re: [Bacula-users] Storage protocols advice sought

Phil Stracchino schrieb am 10.05.23 um 20:11: On 5/10/23 11:19, Chris Wilkinson wrote: This is not really a Bacula question but I'm hoping someone has come across this when using NFS to mount a NAS storage device. As I understand it, the UID:GID on the remote storage and the local SD daemon

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage protocols advice sought

It is a DLink DNS-325 which locked down so no chance of putting the SD there. I guess I could reassign the SD uid:gid however that would upset some existing backups on local disks. Best -Chris- > On 10 May 2023, at 19:11, Phil Stracchino wrote: > > On 5/10/23 11:19, Chris Wilkinson wrote:

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage protocols advice sought

On 5/10/23 11:19, Chris Wilkinson wrote: This is not really a Bacula question but I'm hoping someone has come across this when using NFS to mount a NAS storage device. As I understand it, the UID:GID on the remote storage and the local SD daemon must match or permission denied results. My NAS

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage protocols advice sought

, 11:15 am Dr. Thorsten Brandau, < thorsten.bran...@brace.de> wrote: > Cifs will be probably faster today. If there is a samba v4 installed > > - Originale Nachricht - > Von: Chris Wilkinson > Gesendet: 30.04.23 - 11:28 > An: "Dr. Thorsten Brandau" >

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage protocols advice sought

Cifs will be probably faster today. If there is a samba v4 installed - Originale Nachricht - Von: Chris Wilkinson Gesendet: 30.04.23 - 11:28 An: "Dr. Thorsten Brandau" Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Storage protocols advice sought > Many thanks for those thoughts. The co

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage protocols advice sought

Many thanks for those thoughts. The consensus seems to be CIFS or NFS, v4 if possible. I've done CIFS previously and found it reasonably easy to set up. I've not done NFS so I'll need to play around with it to find the pitfalls. I'm still not clear which is likely to run quickest which I suppose

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage protocols advice sought

Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users schrieb am 30.04.23 um 01:04: On 4/29/23 16:33, Chris Wilkinson wrote: I am about to set up a NAS on a local lan as a storage device. The NAS offers CIFS, NFS, (S)FTP, WEBDAV as supported protocols. The NAS OS is pretty much locked down so there isn't really an

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage protocols advice sought

On 4/29/23 16:33, Chris Wilkinson wrote: I am about to set up a NAS on a local lan as a storage device. The NAS offers CIFS, NFS, (S)FTP, WEBDAV as supported protocols. The NAS OS is pretty much locked down so there isn't really an option to install anything additional. I know that CIFS and

[Bacula-users] Storage protocols advice sought

I am about to set up a NAS on a local lan as a storage device. The NAS offers CIFS, NFS, (S)FTP, WEBDAV as supported protocols. The NAS OS is pretty much locked down so there isn't really an option to install anything additional. I know that CIFS and NFS can be locally mounted but wonder if these

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage configuration for just two hard drives in rotation

On 12/27/22 16:24, Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users wrote: The description above is our current working scenario using Retrospect just scaled way down for testing purposes. For reference, we typically backup around 100ish clients and have three sets of drives that are in rotation: onsite online

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage configuration for just two hard drives in rotation

On 12/26/22 10:37, Joey Prevo wrote: Hello, I'm currently running Bacula 9.6.7 on Ubuntu 20.04 and have been for several months testing it out. We're looking to implement Bacula as a replacement to our current backup system agency wide but before I can present the solution, I have to present a

[Bacula-users] Storage configuration for just two hard drives in rotation

Hello, I'm currently running Bacula 9.6.7 on Ubuntu 20.04 and have been for several months testing it out. We're looking to implement Bacula as a replacement to our current backup system agency wide but before I can present the solution, I have to present a working example. In short, all

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

Great news! You're welcome Nick! Nice to hear everything is working fine now :-) Best, Ana On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 4:49 PM Nick Bright wrote: > Previously I had tried truncating and the output was essentially 'nothing > to truncate', but today it's truncating volumes - it may have just needed >

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

Previously I had tried truncating and the output was essentially 'nothing to truncate', but today it's truncating volumes - it may have just needed some time to pass before running successfully. Thank you very much for your help on this!  - Nick Bright On 12/1/22 05:53, Ana Emília M. Arruda

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

Hello Nick, It seems to me that everything is working fine now. The job log you have sent here is from November 23th, and I see the Vol-0001 has been used on November 25th: | 1 | Vol-0001 | Full | 1 | 53,687,078,657 | 12 | 604,800 | 1 |0 | 0 |

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

Hello Nick, If you have volumes in Purged status, the truncate command should be able to truncate volumes. Unless there is a misconfiguration related to media types and storages. Can you please share with us the following? - list media output - "File1"configuration in both the bacula-dir.conf

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

On 11/25/22 09:20, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: Can you share your pool resource configuration here? Bacula has many directives to different ways to recycle volumes, it would be nice to see how you have the pool configured. Sure, here is my pool configuration: Pool {   Name = File   Pool Type

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

On 2022-11-25 16:00, Nick Bright wrote: [...] inelegant. The system should automatically be pruning or at least allowing me to overwrite the old data - it ought to be cyclical - use the available disk space (17T) to back up systems, letting old backups fall off automatically so that new backups

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

Hello Nick, On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 4:00 PM Nick Bright wrote: > On 11/25/22 04:45, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: > > The easiest way is to allow Bacula to automatically prune Jobs and Files > from the Catalog. It means to have "AutoPrune = Yes" in both the Client > resource and in the Pool

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

On 11/25/22 04:45, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: The easiest way is to allow Bacula to automatically prune Jobs and Files from the Catalog. It means to have "AutoPrune = Yes" in both the Client resource and in the Pool resource. I already had AutoPrune = yes in both the client and pool; I had

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

Hello Nick, Bill, I'm here :-) Sorry for not jumping in earlier. Nick, I will try to summarize a bit about retention values and pruning/truncation in Bacula. Pruning is about "the deletion of jobs and files from Catalog". Automatic or manual prune will not touch the data in the volumes, but only

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

I changed the Volume retention to 7 days, repeated all of the commands, and ran a BackupCatalog job; still reports "The job needs media" On 11/23/22 13:39, Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users wrote: On 11/23/22 12:27, Nick Bright wrote: In the Pool definition there is a Volume Retention of 365

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

If your volumes were allowed to fill the disk to 100%, that might be part of your problem. Your (max volumes * volume size) should leave some buffer space on the disk allocated to Bacula. If your working directory is on the same disk, you need to be even more generous with that buffer (I often use

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

On 2022-11-23 20:02, Nick Bright wrote: Thank you for the replies. The physical disk has about 2% free space (446GB) so it shouldn't be locked preventing any maintenance from occurring due to insufficient storage. Hi Nick If your file system is configured to reserve some percentage of blocks

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

On 11/23/22 12:27, Nick Bright wrote: In the Pool definition there is a Volume Retention of 365 days; however each client has it's own File Retention and Job Retention (7 days each) Shouldn't this result in the data contained within the volumes being expired, and thus the volume could be

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

In the Pool definition there is a Volume Retention of 365 days; however each client has it's own File Retention and Job Retention (7 days each) Shouldn't this result in the data contained within the volumes being expired, and thus the volume could be recycled/purged/truncated once its'

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

Hello Nick, For the pool you showed us, the VolRetention is `31,536,000` seconds. This is not 7 days, but 1 year. You may need to restart your Director, then perform the steps in my previous email again to see the results you are looking for. For VolRetention, you should see `604800` which

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

Thank you for the replies. The physical disk has about 2% free space (446GB) so it shouldn't be locked preventing any maintenance from occurring due to insufficient storage. I issued the "update pool" command, which output

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

On 11/23/22 10:19, Nick Bright wrote: > Speculating this has to do with retention, I turned my retention for both Jobs and Files down to 7 days, but still 'nothing to truncate' is the output. Yes... After reloading the Director's config and doing "update pool=" for the pool(s) you have

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Management

Hi Nick Please execute update pool from resource command in bconsole so Bacula can reflect the retention perio change in the existing volumes. Only after you can execute the truncate command. Best Pedro Nick Bright escreveu em qua., 23/11/2022 às 17:49 : > Greetings, > > I'm new to Bacula,

[Bacula-users] Storage Management

Greetings, I'm new to Bacula, and haven't used tape based backups before (though I've used BackupPC for many years.) I'm running Bacula 11.0.6 on Debian 11. Currently I'm backing up about 30 servers to Bacula, and this seems to be working well; however I've filled up my 17TB of disk, and

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon stopped with NFS mounted storage

instead of NFS. At the moment bacula-dir & bacula-sd run on a single host. The disk space from the filer is used through NFS mounts on the bacula host. Yateen *From:*Josh Fisher *Sent:* Monday, October 4, 2021 8:27 PM *To:* bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net *Subject:* Re: [Bacula-u

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon stopped with NFS mounted storage

ober 4, 2021 8:27 PM To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon stopped with NFS mounted storage On 10/2/21 2:52 AM, Shaligram Bhagat, Yateen (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) wrote: Hi All, We are using Bacula 9.4.4 with PostGreSQL for disk based backeup. Disk s

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon stopped with NFS mounted storage

On 10/2/21 2:52 AM, Shaligram Bhagat, Yateen (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) wrote: Hi All, We are using Bacula 9.4.4 with PostGreSQL for disk based backeup. Disk space is available to Bacula storage daemon as an NFS mount from a remote ZFS based filer that has RAID configured disks. Recently one

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon stopped with NFS mounted storage

Hi All, We are using Bacula 9.4.4 with PostGreSQL for disk based backeup. Disk space is available to Bacula storage daemon as an NFS mount from a remote ZFS based filer that has RAID configured disks. Recently one of the disk in the RAID array failed, degrading the remote ZFS pool. Later we

Re: [Bacula-users] STORAGE DEVICES

> Hello, Heitor. Hello Rodrigo, > “Just use the storage as cache, then you don't need to copy anything to > nowhere. > BTW: the directive name is CacheRetention.” > I need cloud backup, network storage and external disks. > So, I wanted to automate this process, is it possible to do it

Re: [Bacula-users] STORAGE DEVICES

@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] STORAGE DEVICES "I need the backup on local network for a while, and these copies on another storage are automatically. If I set the option "TruncateCache" to "No", I can create a script to copy the volume files to another sto

Re: [Bacula-users] STORAGE DEVICES

"I need the backup on local network for a while, and these copies on another storage are automatically. If I set the option "TruncateCache" to "No", I can create a script to copy the volume files to another storage, this is an solution, but I wanted to do this inside bacula to be able to have a

Re: [Bacula-users] STORAGE DEVICES

, but I wanted to do this inside bacula to be able to have a catalog. Tks, Rodrigo From: Heitor Faria Sent: sexta-feira, 10 de setembro de 2021 13:38 To: ph...@caerllewys.net; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] STORAGE DEVICES IMHO the Bacula Cloud Storage r

Re: [Bacula-users] STORAGE DEVICES

IMHO the Bacula Cloud Storage runs more efficiently as single Bacula Storage for this scenario, where you just use the "TruncateRetention" option to retain your local NAS stored cache for the desired time frame. More practical. Regards, -- MSc Heitor Faria (Miami/USA) CEO Bacula LatAm mobile1:

Re: [Bacula-users] STORAGE DEVICES

On 9/10/21 10:07 AM, Rodrigo Reimberg via Bacula-users wrote: > Hello, > > Can anyone help me to solve a problem? > > I need to copy my jobs of backup in other device. > > Today, the backup storage is cloud only. So i want mantain this backups > in a local network storage too. > > Is it

[Bacula-users] STORAGE DEVICES

Hello, Can anyone help me to solve a problem? I need to copy my jobs of backup in other device. Today, the backup storage is cloud only. So i want mantain this backups in a local network storage too. Is it possible to do this with automatic jobs? Tks, Rodrigo

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Group with multiple disks

Hello, It sounds like you need to learn how Bacula uses the Media Type directive.  By defining different Media Types for different devices, you ensure that Bacula can find the right device.  In general every device that has a different device location (different

[Bacula-users] Storage Group with multiple disks

Hi All, I am a newbie to Bacula. We are piloting Bacula v 9.4.4 for my project and intend to use the VirtualFull backup scheme. We have 20 number of i-scsi disks (disk1 through disk20) on Bacula SD server. We have defined a storage group StorageGroup consolidating the abovementioned disks

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

22.02.2019 10:14 tarihinde Sven Hartge yazdı: Why not try the Debian packages? bacula-9.4.2 is available via stretch-backports. Thank you Sven. This way seems more reliable to me. Best regards. ___ Bacula-users mailing list

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

22.02.2019 20:26 tarihinde Greg Woods yazdı: I had the same symptom on a Fedora system. It turned out that the storage daemon was being started before the network interface was fully up. This is common with systemd-based systems when something is either compiled from source, or installed from

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:32 AM Yılmaz Bilgili via Bacula-users < bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > If I stop the system service and start it manually from command line > with "bacula-sd -d 200 -c /opt/bacula/etc/bacula-sd.conf" command then I > can get status of storage daemon

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

Hello Sven, bacula-* systemd unit scripts sometimes fail to start on machine boot depending on the time required to mount _netdev disks (confirm it with service bacula-sd status after boot). Perhaps, adding this option would make it more resilient: After=network.target mnt-wibble.mount I

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

Just in time: I just read you still uses init.d scripts. Refer to: https://askubuntu.com/questions/90982/how-to-make-a-script-in-init-d-run-later https://serverfault.com/questions/550382/how-to-detect-if-mount-point-exists-from-init-d-script Regards, Sent from TypeApp On Feb 22, 2019, at 7:44 AM,

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

On 22.02.19 10:06, Yılmaz Bilgili via Bacula-users wrote: > 22.02.2019 10:14 tarihinde Sven Hartge yazdı: >> Why not try the Debian packages? bacula-9.4.2 is available via >> stretch-backports. > > I thought packages in the script are official Debian packages too. I > never used backports but

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

22.02.2019 10:14 tarihinde Sven Hartge yazdı: Unfortunately, your systems uses the legacy SysVinit-scripts to start the SD. That way you don't get a whole lot of debugging output in the journal. Did you compile the SD yourself? Maybe you forgot to add "--with-systemd=/lib/systemd/system" to

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

On 21.02.19 19:31, Yılmaz Bilgili via Bacula-users wrote: > # service bacula-sd status > ● bacula-sd.service - LSB: Start Bacula Storage daemon at boot time >    Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/bacula-sd; generated; vendor preset: > enabled) >    Active: active (exited) since Thu 2019-02-21 10:17:45

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

Hello List, At the beginning everything was OK. I updated the system two days ago. Packages below updated. postfix:amd64 (3.1.8-0+deb9u1, 3.1.9-0+deb9u2), gnupg-agent:amd64 (2.1.18-8~deb9u3, 2.1.18-8~deb9u4), libxapian30:amd64 (1.4.3-2+deb9u2, 1.4.3-2+deb9u3), libsystemd0:amd64

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon crashes on Debian 9 with Bacula release 7.4.4+dfsg-6

Am 2017-08-30 17:33, schrieb Sven Hartge: On 30.08.2017 15:19, christian.garl...@cg-networks.de wrote: We never had such a problem before the upgrade, so we are wondering what could be the reason for that. Could you please add deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-debug/ stretch-debug main

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon crashes on Debian 9 with Bacula release 7.4.4+dfsg-6

On 30.08.2017 15:19, christian.garl...@cg-networks.de wrote: > We never had such a problem before the upgrade, so we are wondering what > could be the reason for that. Could you please add deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-debug/ stretch-debug main contrib non-free to your source.list and

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon crashes on Debian 9 with Bacula release 7.4.4+dfsg-6

Hi all, recently we updated our backup server from Debian 8 to Debian 9 with Bacula release 7.4.4+dfsg-6. After a few days we experienced some crashes of the Storage Daemon during the backup runs. When Bacula is idle no crash happens. The log showed this: Aug 26 06:03:15 s110180

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon older that dir & some ad's - possible?

Thanks. > Wanderlei Huttel kirjoitti 10.6.2017 kello 19.03: > > Hello Jari > > You only can use SD and DIR and FD in the same version or SD and DIR in the > same version and FD in prior version. > > > Best Regards > > Wanderlei Hüttel > http://www.huttel.com.br

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon older that dir & some ad's - possible?

Hello Jari You only can use SD and DIR and FD in the same version or SD and DIR in the same version and FD in prior version. Best Regards *Wanderlei Hüttel* http://www.huttel.com.br 2017-06-10 12:23 GMT-03:00 Jari Fredriksson : > > Can I use SD 5.x with 7.x components? I have a

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon older that dir & some ad's - possible?

On 06/10/2017 09:23 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: Can I use SD 5.x with 7.x components? I have a need for such, as I do not wish to compile. Hi Jari, The SD(s) must always be the same (exact) version as the DIR. The FD(s) can be lower versions with the only side-effect being that they will

[Bacula-users] Storage daemon older that dir & some ad's - possible?

Can I use SD 5.x with 7.x components? I have a need for such, as I do not wish to compile. Jari Fredriksson Bitwell Oy +358 400 779 440 ja...@bitwell.fi Dev: https://www.bitwell.fi Ops: https://www.bitwell.biz

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage is stuck at "Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume"

Hi, 1. it is a 5 concurrently started copies of: a) 2 backup jobs b) 2 Copy jobs that copies Full backups from a) c) 2 Copy jobs that copies Incremental backups from a) I can sometimes replicate the problem with just a 2 copies of the above, but this has been about 90 % reliable. The problem

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage is stuck at "Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume"

Hello, Well, I am out of ideas. Yes, Bacula has a bugs database, and you can report it, but at this point it appears unlikely that it is a bug otherwise someone else would have the same problem. I will need to have a way to reproduce the problem. You can try turning on level 200 debug in the

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage is stuck at "Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume"

Hi, thanks for your reply. Ad 1: they are the same, specifically 7.4.3+dfsg-1+sid1~bpo8+1 from jessie-backports (I just verified it). For this test, even the FDs were this version. Ad 2: I worked with clean catalog: - stop director and storages - psql: drop database bacula - psql: create

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage is stuck at "Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume"

Hello, The error you are getting should never happen, which means that something is seriously wrong with your Bacula installation. A few of the multiple possibilities are: 1. Your DIR and SDs are not on the same version. They *must* all be the same. With the little information you provided,

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage is stuck at "Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume"

User optiz0r at irc helped me to get trace files for all daemons, its at http://filebin.ca/3HoXMMcEo2rv/traces.tar.gz The configuration used may be slightly different (only difference I can think of is setting Attribute Spooling = yes). We noticed following errors: bacst1-sd.trace:bacst1-sd:

[Bacula-users] Storage is stuck at "Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume"

Hi, We are using Bacula to back up our company's data. All storages are ordinary Debian Jessie Linux servers with spinning disks, we don't use tapes. Bacula version is 7.0.5+dfsg-4~bpo80+1 and 7.4.3+dfsg-1+sid1~bpo8+1 (we tried both). We need 2 copies of each backup placed in separate

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Devices not displaying in bconsole status

Hi Shon, > I am having an issue where when I run a status command in bconsole, select > "Storage", > I am only presented with the option for status on 3 of my defined storage > resources. > I am trying to figure out why this is, but am being left with a blank. > Backups do seem > to be running

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Devices not displaying in bconsole status

Dear Ben, Thank you very much. Part of my mind had wondered if it was a change in display behavior as I only recently upgraded to 7.0. As you can see from the configs they are all on the same SD instance. I think it doesn't deduplicate the other Disk storage because it's using a different

[Bacula-users] Storage Devices not displaying in bconsole status

Dear All, I am having an issue where when I run a status command in bconsole, select "Storage", I am only presented with the option for status on 3 of my defined storage resources. I am trying to figure out why this is, but am being left with a blank. Backups do seem to be running at present,

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon listen on IPv6

Hello Josh, I run tests with different bacula versions: using 5.2.6, it seems bacula do not recognize the "ip" directive and it was necessary to use the "ipv6" directive instead. Versions 7.0.5 and 7.2.0 worked fine with "ip = { addr = :: }" and "ip = { addr = ::0 }". Best regards, Ana On Thu,

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon listen on IPv6

On 9/9/2015 4:29 PM, Matthew Voss wrote: > It says "Config error: Can't add hostname(::/0) and port(9103) to addrlist". My bad. That should be (::0), not (::/0). Most IPv6 address can be written multiple ways. Writing it as (::0), adding the numeric '0', might allow Bacula to see it as an

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon listen on IPv6

On 9/9/2015 5:06 PM, Matthew Voss wrote: > Hi Ana, > > My bacula installation is version 5.2.13. > > Matthew I believe that Ana's example, using the 'ipv6' keyword rather than the 'ip' keyword, will work. Nevertheless, it SHOULD have worked with the 'ip' keyword. The 'ip' keyword is

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon listen on IPv6

Hi All, I'm trying to make the Storage Daemon visible via IPv6. I've followed this[1] guide without success. I've also attempted to use the SDAddresses directive like this: SDAddresses = { ip = { addr = :: port = 9103 } } The storage daemon seemed to go silent when I

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon listen on IPv6

It says "Config error: Can't add hostname(::/0) and port(9103) to addrlist". Matthew On 09/09/2015 12:55 PM, Josh Fisher wrote: > > On 9/9/2015 2:54 PM, Matthew Voss wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm trying to make the Storage Daemon visible via IPv6. I've followed >> this[1] guide without success.

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon listen on IPv6

Hello Matthew, Which version are you using? :: worked for me in 7.2.0. Director { Name = x-dir DirAddresses = { ipv6 = { addr=::; port=9101 } } x-dir: bnet_server.c:87-0 Addresses [::]:9101 tcp0 0 :::9101 :::*LISTEN Best

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon listen on IPv6

On 9/9/2015 2:54 PM, Matthew Voss wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm trying to make the Storage Daemon visible via IPv6. I've followed > this[1] guide without success. I've also attempted to use the > SDAddresses directive like this: > > SDAddresses = { > ip = { > addr = :: > port =

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon listen on IPv6

Hi Ana, My bacula installation is version 5.2.13. Matthew On 09/09/2015 02:04 PM, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: > Hello Matthew, > > Which version are you using? :: worked for me in 7.2.0. > > Director { > Name = x-dir > DirAddresses = { > ipv6 = { addr=::; port=9101 } > } > >

[Bacula-users] Storage daemon didnt accept Device

Hi, I have the same problem with some of my defined jobs. Sometimes it fails, sometimes not. I run the failed jobs by hand and it works OK. Here's the log: 02-jul 01:22 bacula.intranet.visualtis.com JobId 914: Fatal error: Storage daemon didn't accept Device BackupsWeekly-OVH command.

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage feature in 7.0.x

Quoting message written on Thursday 2014-05-22 17:28:55: Hello Josip, I have pushed a patch from Eric, that I believe fixes your bug. It is in the current public git repo, and I would appreciate it if you would test it. Hello Bill, I have also pushed a patch that may well fix the

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage feature in 7.0.x

Hello, Yes, sorry for the inconvenience. I pushed the changes but only to the test repo. I have now pushed it to the public repo. Again, sorry, Kern On 05/23/2014 11:19 AM, Josip Deanovic wrote: Quoting message written on Thursday 2014-05-22 17:28:55: Hello Josip, I have pushed a patch

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage feature in 7.0.x

Quoting message written on Friday 2014-05-23 13:42:41: Hello, Yes, sorry for the inconvenience. I pushed the changes but only to the test repo. I have now pushed it to the public repo. Again, sorry, Kern Thank you, I'll proceed with the tests. Regards -- Josip Deanovic

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage feature in 7.0.x

Quoting message written on Friday 2014-05-23 13:50:27: Quoting message written on Friday 2014-05-23 13:42:41: Hello, Yes, sorry for the inconvenience. I pushed the changes but only to the test repo. I have now pushed it to the public repo. Again, sorry, Kern Thank you,

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage feature in 7.0.x

Quoting message written on Friday 2014-05-23 15:56:07: I have completed storage to storage tests and everything looks OK now. This is what I have tested: - normal copy job from one pool to an additional pool on the same SD - copy job from default pool located on the primary SD to the other

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage feature in 7.0.x

Hello Josip, This is a relatively complicated feature from an implementation standpoint, so I can certainly expect a bug or two as is usually the case with so much new code, so I will be interested to see your results. I will be away on vacation for a week from the 24th to the 31st, so please

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage feature in 7.0.x

Hello Josip, Thanks for the details. This sounds pretty simple to duplicate. I will get back to you, but possibly not until after the 31st. Sorry. We'll see ... Kern On 05/21/2014 10:53 AM, Josip Deanovic wrote: Josip DeanovicOn Tuesday 2014-05-20 23:04:14 wrote: On Tuesday 2014-05-20

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage feature in 7.0.x

Quoting message written on Thursday 2014-05-22 15:13:38: Hello Josip, This is a relatively complicated feature from an implementation standpoint, so I can certainly expect a bug or two as is usually the case with so much new code, so I will be interested to see your results. I will be

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage feature in 7.0.x

Hello Josip, I have pushed a patch from Eric, that I believe fixes your bug. It is in the current public git repo, and I would appreciate it if you would test it. Hello Bill, I have also pushed a patch that may well fix the problem you are having with cancel. I have never been able to

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage feature in 7.0.x

Quoting message written on Thursday 2014-05-22 17:28:55: Hello Josip, I have pushed a patch from Eric, that I believe fixes your bug. It is in the current public git repo, and I would appreciate it if you would test it. Hi Kern, Thank you for the patch. I'll test the bacula from current

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage feature in 7.0.x

Josip DeanovicOn Tuesday 2014-05-20 23:04:14 wrote: On Tuesday 2014-05-20 19:04:15 Kern Sibbald wrote: I did hundreds of copy/migration jobs testing this new feature. I only did a few with a totally separate SD though. I'll make additional tests tomorrow and report here with more info.

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage feature in 7.0.x

Hello, I suspect that you are trying to do something a bit too complicated from the beginning. I recommend starting with a very simple copy or migration job within a single storage daemon and ensure that it works. Then point the output storage daemon to an external SD. If your setup is simple

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage feature in 7.0.x

On Tuesday 2014-05-20 19:04:15 Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello, I suspect that you are trying to do something a bit too complicated from the beginning. I recommend starting with a very simple copy or migration job within a single storage daemon and ensure that it works. Then point the output

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage feature in 7.0.x

On May 16, 2014, at 3:00 AM, Josip Deanovic djosip+n...@linuxpages.net wrote: Josip Deanovic on Wednesday 2014-05-14 15:57:35 wrote: Greetings! I am trying to utilize the new storage to storage (replication or off-site backup) feature in bacula 7.0.x and I am having some issues regarding

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage feature in 7.0.x

Josip Deanovic on Wednesday 2014-05-14 15:57:35 wrote: Greetings! I am trying to utilize the new storage to storage (replication or off-site backup) feature in bacula 7.0.x and I am having some issues regarding this task. I am using bacula 7.0.2 and I have configured two pools and two

[Bacula-users] Storage to storage feature in 7.0.x

Greetings! I am trying to utilize the new storage to storage (replication or off-site backup) feature in bacula 7.0.x and I am having some issues regarding this task. I am using bacula 7.0.2 and I have configured two pools and two storages with different Device and MediaType specified in their

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage copy jobs using TLS

On 05/10/2014 01:13 AM, Alexander E. Fischer wrote: Sorry I didn't test it in Bacula because Bareos supplied a fix in their experimental builds and that one works now with TLS. I have no idea if it also works with Bacula but I can't really try because Debian won't

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage copy jobs using TLS

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/10/2014 01:23 AM, Dan Langille wrote: On May 9, 2014, at 7:13 PM, Alexander E. Fischer a...@raxys.net wrote: On Fr, 2014-05-09 at 18:42 -0400, Dan Langille wrote: On May 1, 2014, at

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage copy jobs using TLS

On May 1, 2014, at 1:45 PM, Alexander E. Fischer a...@raxys.net wrote: Hello, when I first noticed that the Bareos fork has implemented storage to storage copy jobs I wanted to use that because it would make a lot of sense for my backup scenario. Only after spending quite a lot of time I

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage copy jobs using TLS

Sorry I didn't test it in Bacula because Bareos supplied a fix in their experimental builds and that one works now with TLS. I have no idea if it also works with Bacula but I can't really try because Debian won't provide packages of the current Bacula version for quite a long time and I really

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage copy jobs using TLS

On May 9, 2014, at 7:13 PM, Alexander E. Fischer a...@raxys.net wrote: On Fr, 2014-05-09 at 18:42 -0400, Dan Langille wrote: On May 1, 2014, at 1:45 PM, Alexander E. Fischer a...@raxys.net wrote: Hello, when I first noticed that the Bareos fork has implemented storage to storage copy

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage copy jobs using TLS

On May 9, 2014, at 7:23 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote: On May 9, 2014, at 7:13 PM, Alexander E. Fischer a...@raxys.net wrote: On Fr, 2014-05-09 at 18:42 -0400, Dan Langille wrote: On May 1, 2014, at 1:45 PM, Alexander E. Fischer a...@raxys.net wrote: Hello, when I first

  1   2   3   >