Hello,
I am running a full back up with a size of estimate files=983,529
bytes=306,761,539,624, the backup started normally and used up 1
full tape 160GB (uncompressed), then it switched tapes and continued
to copy data to the second tape, but all of the sudden it stops and
bacula
2010/8/11 Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com:
Hello,
I am running a full back up with a size of estimate files=983,529
bytes=306,761,539,624, the backup started normally and used up 1 full tape
160GB (uncompressed), then it switched tapes and continued to copy data to
the second tape, but all
Yes, i understand that, but when the tape CNH910 got full, bacula
unloaded the tape and loaded CNH911, when loading the tape, bacula
marked it as used before writing any data to it. It did the same
with CNH910. Here is the list of tapes before the job started:
Pool: Scratch
Yes, i understand that, but when the tape CNH910 got full, bacula unloaded
the tape and loaded CNH911, when loading the tape, bacula marked it as
used before writing any data to it.
So you are saying there was 148GB of data on CNH911 before the job
started. Then bacula loaded the volume,
2010/8/11 Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com:
Hello,
I am running a full back up with a size of estimate files=983,529
bytes=306,761,539,624, the backup started normally and used up 1 full tape
160GB (uncompressed), then it switched tapes and continued to copy data to
the second tape, but all
Could it be the schedule..? Well since i havent got a full backup, i
manually ran the full backup job. Does this mean that since the job
scheduled for the 1st sunday hadnt run, bacula scheduled and tried to
run it as if it was the 1st sun?
Shouldnt bacula check for the a full backup for
Could it be the schedule..? Well since i havent got a full backup, i
manually ran the full backup job. Does this mean that since the job
scheduled for the 1st sunday hadnt run, bacula scheduled and tried to run it
as if it was the 1st sun?
I think so.
Shouldnt bacula check for the a full
No, there was no data in the tape. All tapes were label barcode and
placed in the scratch pool. The 142GB were written by that job. Like
you said, it seems the same job is running 2 times. I ll wait and see..
Prior to starting the job:
Pool: Scratch
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com wrote:
No, there was no data in the tape. All tapes were label barcode and placed
in the scratch pool. The 142GB were written by that job. Like you said, it
seems the same job is running 2 times. I ll wait and see..
You are
