Re: change in morality Re: Interesting thread

2005-10-28 Thread Iskandar Hai, M.D.
Another memorable post for the hall of fame of rubbish and non-sensical comments. Iskandar On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Gilberto Simpson wrote: > On 10/27/05, Susan Maneck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "How did they change? (I don't mean, "what was the change?", I mean > > "What was the process by whi

Re: change in morality Re: Interesting thread

2005-10-27 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On 10/27/05, Susan Maneck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "How did they change? (I don't mean, "what was the change?", I mean > "What was the process by which they changed?")" > > Dear Gilberto, > > I consider the Will of God to be the basis of all morality. That Will is > expressed through revelation

RE: change in morality Re: Interesting thread

2005-10-27 Thread Susan Maneck
"How did they change? (I don't mean, "what was the change?", I mean "What was the process by which they changed?")" Dear Gilberto, I consider the Will of God to be the basis of all morality. That Will is expressed through revelation. And it was revealed through Baha'u'llah that would be no more g

change in morality Re: Interesting thread

2005-10-27 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On 10/27/05, Susan Maneck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "If Banu Qurayzah was under Muhammad's (saaws) "watch" and you believe > Muhamad was a Manifestation of God, then even if the religion of Islam > never existed, Bahais should have to come to terms with explaining the > ethics and morality of su