b
Please, what is the correct translation of the Master's words to
actual lost linkconcept?
We share a common ancestor with apes? If that is true, man
always have been man is true?
Dear Hasan,
I think Keven Brown managed to find the original for this talk Abdu'l-
Baha gave, but I don't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We all come from God. And Abdu'l-Baha does attest that we ascend
through the four kingdonms. That certainly suggests to me we had to
go through the animal kingdom.
I think a careful read will reveal that Abdul-Baha seems to be saying
that atoms that make us up
:We were never individual atoms. I think this is a faulty
scientific analogy characteristic of Abdul-Baha's time,
and i think that's a brilliant answer.
i would take it one step further towards the issue materialist/spiritualist:
we are likweise not the result of the actions of those atoms.
If you talk that way, then, Manifestations descend from God :-)
We all come from God. And Abdu'l-Baha does attest that we ascend
through the four kingdonms. That certainly suggests to me wwe had to
go through the animal kingdom.
The information contained in this e-mail and any
get why the Master said the lost link will never be found?Thanks for answer, Hasan
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and
So, I don't get why the Master said the lost link will never be
found?
Thanks for answer, Hasan
Dear Hasan,
As I mentioned the concept of a 'missing link' in the late 19th
century and early 20th century had to do with popular (mis)conceptions
about evolution wherein they thought
Please, what is the correct translation of the Master's words to actual "lost link"concept? We share a common ancestor with apes? If that is true, "man always have been man" is true? [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: So, I don't get why the Master said the lost link will neve
I think men were always men; we are of a different order, as we
are different from Manifestations.
Perhaps that is a very good analogy. If Manifestations descend from
men, why can't men descend from animals?
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail)
What Manifestation of God has not said I am but a man like you?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps that is a very good analogy. If Manifestations descend from
men, why can't men descend from animals?
The information contained in this e-mail and any
If you talk that way, then, Manifestations descend from God :-)[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi: I think men were always men; we are of a different order, as we are different from Manifestations.Perhaps that is a very good analogy. If Manifestations descend from men, why can't men descend from
Susan, Abdu'l-Bah saidthat the link assumed to be missing between man and animal will never be found:"The link which they say is lost is itself a proof that man was never an animal. How is it possible to have all the links present and that important link absent? Though one spend this
. And I think we can reasonabley expect that at some
point we will find the common ancestor of men and apes.
warmest, Susan
- Original Message -
From: Hasan Elias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 10:14 am
Subject: lost link - will never found
To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st
we will find the common ancestor of men and apes.
warmest, Susan
- Original Message -
From: Hasan Elias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 10:14 am
Subject: lost link - will never found
To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Susan, Abdu'l-Bahá said that the link
, 2006 10:14 amSubject: lost link - will never found
To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Susan, Abdu'l-Bah said that the link assumed to be missing between man and animal will never be found:
The link which they say is lost is itself a proof that man was never an animal. How is it possible
the statement that such a link will never be found is in fact a scientific
statement if one applies strict rules of scientific enquiry.
the first of those rules in what are we talking about?
and it is this question that the Master is addressing, imho.
if man is a spiritual being, then no
That doesn't seem to resolve the issue. The claim isn't that that
there is no missing link from modern humans to modern apes. The claim
is that man was never an animal
And that's a claim which I don't think science can prove or disprove.
Clearly man is physically an animal, bu what makes him
There
are *many*
fossils already discovered that belonged to primate species that
precededthe split between the current living human and non-human
primates.
Dear Ron,
I'm not thinking of early primates in general, I'm thinking more
specifically of the common ancestor of man and the
I don't think the diferences between men and animals are only spiritual, that's why I asked why the Maester compared the memory of a pigeon with man. Are you saying human soul can act in a chimpanzee or an octopus?I think men were always men; we are of a different order, as we are
18 matches
Mail list logo
