On Thursday 12 Nov 2009 1:07:26 pm kausikram krishnasayee wrote:
> > There are a couple of Python-only IDEs out there which might work for
> > you. Eric, Idle, SPE are 3 that come to mind. I'm sure that bigger
> > ones like Eclipse have Python plugins as well.
> >
> > I use Emacs + a couple of exte
I've recently switched to Spyder
http://packages.python.org/spyder/
It has QT dependencies. I'm using it on Ubuntu Karmic and it has been a very
happy .
SPE is also a recent favorite but I'm not very happy with Wxwidgets
http://pythonide.blogspot.com/
US number: +1 650-862-5992
Indian Number
>
> There are a couple of Python-only IDEs out there which might work for
> you. Eric, Idle, SPE are 3 that come to mind. I'm sure that bigger
> ones like Eclipse have Python plugins as well.
>
> I use Emacs + a couple of external things and it works for me. I had a
> link describing some useful cu
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:25 PM, R Gopinath wrote:
> Hi,
> I hope all the people here are my forefathers and experts in python. please
> suggest me a good IDE for python which can point out syntax errors while
> typind and also able to complie and produce output.
There are a couple of Python-on
Hi,
I hope all the people here are my forefathers and experts in python. please
suggest me a good IDE for python which can point out syntax errors while
typind and also able to complie and produce output.
--
Cheers,
R.Gopinath,
http://neuronring.com
__
Noufal, that was me. I will check it out soon. Thanks.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> Someone on this list asked a while ago about installing and using
> different versions of Python on the same machine. Here's something
> relevant that might be useful.
> http://tartle
Someone on this list asked a while ago about installing and using
different versions of Python on the same machine. Here's something
relevant that might be useful.
http://tartley.com/?p=883
--
~noufal
http://nibrahim.net.in
___
BangPypers mailing list
B
On Thursday 12 Nov 2009 10:12:43 am Rama Rao Polneni wrote:
> 1. Reading all elements from from listbox. Currently I am able to read only
> selected files.
what do you mean by 'read all the elements'
> 2. Displaying scrollbar. I dont know how to display scrollbar.
>
afaik both vertical and horiz
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:12:43 +0530, Rama Rao Polneni
wrote:
> David,
>
> This problem is not at all related to the parsing of the filenames.
>
> Here I strucked in GUI part only.
>
> 1. Reading all elements from from listbox. Currently I am able to read
only
> selected files.
Best to look at t
David,
This problem is not at all related to the parsing of the filenames.
Here I strucked in GUI part only.
1. Reading all elements from from listbox. Currently I am able to read only
selected files.
2. Displaying scrollbar. I dont know how to display scrollbar.
Thanks,
Rama Rao
On 11/12/09,
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:05:52 +0530, Rama Rao Polneni
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I am using BOA.
>
> Bu the problem here is I am able to read only selected files. But I want
to
> read all the files. and I dont know how to insert horizantal scrollbar in
> listbox.as my file name contains full path. It
Hi David,
I am using BOA.
Bu the problem here is I am able to read only selected files. But I want to
read all the files. and I dont know how to insert horizantal scrollbar in
listbox.as my file name contains full path. It will be very long.
Thanks,
Rama
On 11/12/09, David Lyon wrote:
>
>
> R
Rama,
Best thing to do is download Boa Constructor. It is an
IDE that will allow you to get through that task in under
30 minutes.
David
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:56:51 +0530, Rama Rao Polneni
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you please help me in writing python code for the follwing
requirement.
>
> I hav
Hi,
Can you please help me in writing python code for the follwing requirement.
I have a list box. In which I need to browse multiple files from multiple
locations and need to show them in the list box.
Then I will be able to read all the file names("all" means-No
selection/deselction mechanism)
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Pradeep Gowda wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:47 PM, JAGANADH G wrote:
> > url = self.BASEURL + "pmid=%d" + "&tag=ntag&type=ge" %d
>
> Did you mean:
> url = self.BASEURL + "pmid=%d" % (d, ) + "&tag=ntag&type=ge" ?
>
> Even though this might fix your proble
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Pradeep Gowda wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:47 PM, JAGANADH G wrote:
> > url = self.BASEURL + "pmid=%d" + "&tag=ntag&type=ge" %d
>
> Did you mean:
> url = self.BASEURL + "pmid=%d" % (d, ) + "&tag=ntag&type=ge" ?
>
> Even though this might fix your proble
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:47 PM, JAGANADH G wrote:
> url = self.BASEURL + "pmid=%d" + "&tag=ntag&type=ge" %d
Did you mean:
url = self.BASEURL + "pmid=%d" % (d, ) + "&tag=ntag&type=ge" ?
Even though this might fix your problem, don't use it.
To encode URLs always use urlencode: http://docs.py
Hi,
Can anybody help me on spiffworkflow?
code is given here http://code.google.com/p/spiff-workflow/ i am not able to
get documentation for this, if anyone of you can help me, i will be very
greatfull.
Its based on http://workflowpatterns.com/, and big library to implement
Workflow.I dont have
Dear All
What is wrong with this expression
url = self.BASEURL + "pmid=%d" + "&tag=ntag&type=ge" %d
--
**
JAGANADH G
http://jaganadhg.freeflux.net/blog
Sent from Chennai, TN, India
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPyper
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Darkseid wrote:
> Yes, yes, I know, I know. While I'm no vi or emacs guru, I've paired (for a
> fair amount of time) with experienced VI and Emacs users. Snippets, Ctags
> etc. help a great deal - but have you ever worked with an AST aware
> development environment
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Darkseid wrote:
> Yes, yes, I know, I know. While I'm no vi or emacs guru, I've paired (for a
> fair amount of time) with experienced VI and Emacs users. Snippets, Ctags
> etc. help a great deal - but have you ever worked with an AST aware
> development environmen
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Darkseid wrote:
>>
>> 2. It's easy to hire an IDE-aware monkey to do programming in "proven
>> technology"
>
> I do most of my work in Ruby (and have done for a few years now). Every day
> I bemoan the lack of a powerful refactoring IDE like Java has in IntelliJ. A
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Darkseid wrote:
>
>> 2. It's easy to hire an IDE-aware monkey to do programming in "proven
>> technology"
>>
> I do most of my work in Ruby (and have done for a few years now). Every day
> I bemoan the lack of a powerful refactoring IDE like Java has in IntelliJ.
Yeah, that too :)
Someday I will get of my ass and become a Emacs power user. Until then
I'm muddling along with TextMate, snippets and a bunch of custom shell
scripts. Of course
http://martinfowler.com/bliki/IntentionalSoftware.html could become
production ready first, in which case I may ta
Yes, yes, I know, I know. While I'm no vi or emacs guru, I've paired
(for a fair amount of time) with experienced VI and Emacs users.
Snippets, Ctags etc. help a great deal - but have you ever worked with
an AST aware development environment where you can safely make
structural changes across y
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Darkseid wrote:
> you can only get so far with a
> text editor*, no matter how many macros you have set up. Honestly.
>
Macros?? Really??? Don't you mean "no matter how many scripts you
have set up" :)
___
BangPype
Harish,
I [shall carefully reply to] you because I had
[searched my mail and found] that you were a serious
man, to be treated with respect. But I must say no to
you and let me give you my reasons. It's true I have a
lot of friends in [software], but they wouldn't be so
friendly if they knew my bu
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Darkseid wrote:
>>
>> 2. It's easy to hire an IDE-aware monkey to do programming in "proven
>> technology"
>
> I do most of my work in Ruby (and have done for a few years now). Every day
> I bemoan the lack of a powerful refactoring IDE like Java has in IntelliJ. A
Javascript is weakly
typed but you don't have buffer overflow problems there.
That's something I've never understood even though the all powerful
wikipedia says JS is weakly typed. Can someone give me an example to
illustrate the weak typing?
I would assume that people are arguing for strong t
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Darkseid wrote:
>
>> 2. It's easy to hire an IDE-aware monkey to do programming in "proven
>> technology"
>>
> I do most of my work in Ruby (and have done for a few years now). Every day
> I bemoan the lack of a powerful refactoring IDE like Java has in IntelliJ.
VS is no just-text editor. But hey, that's a flame war waiting to happen!
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Darkseid wrote:
>
>> 2. It's easy to hire an IDE-aware monkey to do programming in "proven
>> technology"
>>
> I do most of my work in Ruby (and have done for a few years now). Every day
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Balachandran Sivakumar <
benignb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Shashwat Anand
> wrote:
> > Go - a son of C++ and python .. ??
> > to me it looked like verbose C .. first impression..not good. I mean it's
> > ok..but not to the level of Go
2. It's easy to hire an IDE-aware monkey to do programming in "proven
technology"
I do most of my work in Ruby (and have done for a few years now). Every
day I bemoan the lack of a powerful refactoring IDE like Java has in
IntelliJ. A good IDE is a massive productivity booster; you can only get
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Roshan Mathews wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
> wrote:
> > The point is that so called compiled languages provide more security
> > loop-holes than interpreted ones. C++/C for example provide liberal
> > scope for buffer ov
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
> wrote:
> [..]
> > Upon 2nd reading, I also thought they did, but not a very good
> > disambiguation there I daresay. But "security benefits associated to
> > a compiled langua
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Roshan Mathews wrote:
>> The "looks like Python, runs like C++" is more than just marketing
>> speak.
>
> If you haven't noticed, "Looks like Python, runs like C++" has a lot of
> marketing pote
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Shashwat Anand
wrote:
> Go - a son of C++ and python .. ??
> to me it looked like verbose C .. first impression..not good. I mean it's
> ok..but not to the level of Google. We expect better from mythical Google
> engineers.
>
Well, more than Google, you should be
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
wrote:
> Not sure if go people said this. But it is in the techcrunch link
> posted by Sriram, in another thread, 1st paragraph.
>
> http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/10/google-go-language/
>
> I didn't make it up :-)
>
Wasn't suggesti
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Pradeep Gowda wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Roshan Mathews
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
> >> wrote:
> >> > Upon 2nd reading, I a
On 11/11/2009 06:22 PM, Pradeep Gowda wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:18 AM, steve wrote:
On 11/11/2009 04:17 PM, Ramdas S wrote:
[...snip...]
Yeah! I jumped the line without reading. Actually going through now and
downloading the stuff I cant see much from Python perspective, that
bloo
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
wrote:
[..]
> Upon 2nd reading, I also thought they did, but not a very good
> disambiguation there I daresay. But "security benefits associated to
> a compiled language" - I fall flat there since I don't see any
> correlation with a
Go - a son of C++ and python .. ??
to me it looked like verbose C .. first impression..not good. I mean it's
ok..but not to the level of Google. We expect better from mythical Google
engineers.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Ramdas S wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Darkseid wrote:
>
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Dhananjay Nene wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:23 PM, wrote:
>
>> I just heard about Google Go.My first reaction was of excitement.But when
>> i read about it i'm clueless as to what is it aiming for?
>> What do every feel about it?
>>
>> this is the link to th
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:23 PM, wrote:
> I just heard about Google Go.My first reaction was of excitement.But when i
> read about it i'm clueless as to what is it aiming for?
> What do every feel about it?
>
> this is the link to the blog post announcing Go.
> http://google-opensource.blogspot.c
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Roshan Mathews wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
>> wrote:
>> > Upon 2nd reading, I also thought they did, but not a very good
>> > disambiguation there I d
You can also get hints from reports generated by pylint for checking
c++ code quality.
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Roshan Mathews wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
> wrote:
> > The point is that so called compiled languages provide more security
> > loop-holes than interpreted ones. C++/C for example provide liberal
> > scope for buffer ov
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Darkseid wrote:
>
>> I found out yesterday that the application has to be developed on a
>> proven
>> technology like Java,C++ or C#. When I spoke to the gentleman he said his
>> consultant said that dynamically typed languages are not safe for mission
>> critica
> That's what the big boys of the world wants you to believe. I had met a very
> senior official in the government a techy himself and spent 3 hours showing
> him virtues of Python and Django, hoping that they will change the RFP
> terms.
>
> I found out yesterday that the application has to be dev
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Roshan Mathews wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
> wrote:
> > Upon 2nd reading, I also thought they did, but not a very good
> > disambiguation there I daresay. But "security benefits associated to
> > a compiled language" -
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:18 AM, steve wrote:
> On 11/11/2009 04:17 PM, Ramdas S wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> But I don't see the Python connection at all here.
>>>
>>>
>> Yeah! I jumped the line without reading. Actually going through now and
>> downloading the stuff I cant see much from Python perspecti
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
wrote:
> The point is that so called compiled languages provide more security
> loop-holes than interpreted ones. C++/C for example provide liberal
> scope for buffer overflow exploits due to use of pointers and manual
> memory managem
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Darkseid wrote:
> I do hope you snidely pointed out to him that half of Google runs on Python?
> :D
>
Which half? :)
http://groups.google.com/group/unladen-swallow/browse_thread/thread/4edbc406f544643e
--
Roshan Mathews
http://teamtalk.im
_
I found out yesterday that the application has to be developed on a proven
technology like Java,C++ or C#. When I spoke to the gentleman he said his
consultant said that dynamically typed languages are not safe for mission
critical work. The work is far from being mission-critical is another poi
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
wrote:
> Upon 2nd reading, I also thought they did, but not a very good
> disambiguation there I daresay. But "security benefits associated to
> a compiled language" - I fall flat there since I don't see any
> correlation with a langu
> The point is that so called compiled languages provide more security
> loop-holes than interpreted ones. C++/C for example provide liberal
> scope for buffer overflow exploits due to use of pointers and manual
> memory management.
>
> Accessing any buffer outside the scope of your data stru
Go combines the development speed of working in a dynamic language
like Python with the performance and safety of a compiled language
like C or C++.
It could just be the cynic in me, but this looks a lot like the
marketing MS did to sell VB.Net to VB devs. Vague phrases that aren't
precisely in
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Ramdas S wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <
> abpil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Noufal Ibrahim
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
> > > wrote:
> > > [..
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <
abpil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
> > wrote:
> > [..]
> > > "The company says that Go is experimental, and that it comb
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
> wrote:
> [..]
> > "The company says that Go is experimental, and that it combines the
> > performance and security benefits associated with using a compiled
> language
> > like
On 11/11/2009 04:17 PM, Ramdas S wrote:
But I don't see the Python connection at all here.
Yeah! I jumped the line without reading. Actually going through now and
downloading the stuff I cant see much from Python perspective, that bloody
language is full of braces, but yes syntactically it
>
>
> But I don't see the Python connection at all here.
>
>
Yeah! I jumped the line without reading. Actually going through now and
downloading the stuff I cant see much from Python perspective, that bloody
language is full of braces, but yes syntactically its more sugary and clean
I guess it mi
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
wrote:
[..]
> "The company says that Go is experimental, and that it combines the
> performance and security benefits associated with using a compiled language
> like C++ with the speed of a dynamic language like Python"
Perhaps they mea
[snip]
> Also this line is funny.
>
> "The company says that Go is experimental, and that it combines the
> performance and security benefits associated with using a compiled language
> like C++ with the speed of a dynamic language like Python"
>
> Heh, speed of Python and security of C++ ? I th
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Mahadevan R
> wrote:
> [..]
> > "By Robert Griesemer, Rob Pike, Ken Thompson, Ian Taylor, Russ Cox,
> > Jini Kim and Adam Langley - The Go Team"
> [..]
>
> That caught my eye too but another language?
>
Bu
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Mahadevan R wrote:
[..]
> "By Robert Griesemer, Rob Pike, Ken Thompson, Ian Taylor, Russ Cox,
> Jini Kim and Adam Langley - The Go Team"
[..]
That caught my eye too but another language?
--
~noufal
http://nibrahim.net.in
_
Its an exciting time to be a Python programmer.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Mahadevan R wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:23 PM, wrote:
> > I just heard about Google Go.My first reaction was of excitement.But when
> i
> > read about it i'm clueless as to what is it aiming for?
> > What do
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:23 PM, wrote:
> I just heard about Google Go.My first reaction was of excitement.But when i
> read about it i'm clueless as to what is it aiming for?
> What do every feel about it?
>
> this is the link to the blog post announcing Go.
> http://google-opensource.blogspot.c
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Roshan Mathews wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:23 PM, wrote:
> > I just heard about Google Go.My first reaction was of excitement.But when
> i
> > read about it i'm clueless as to what is it aiming for?
> > What do every feel about it?
> >
> Did you see the v
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:23 PM, wrote:
> I just heard about Google Go.My first reaction was of excitement.But when i
> read about it i'm clueless as to what is it aiming for?
> What do every feel about it?
>
Did you see the video [1] linked from that link? They say it's for
systems programming.
I just heard about Google Go.My first reaction was of excitement.But
when i read about it i'm clueless as to what is it aiming for?
What do every feel about it?
this is the link to the blog post announcing Go.
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2009/11/hey-ho-lets-go.html
Regards,
Varun Thac
71 matches
Mail list logo
