Re: [basex-talk] Dr. Mike Kay's proposals for XPath and XQuery 4.0

2020-11-16 Thread Christian Grün
Hi Marco, We already spent too much time in the HTTP-Client 2 Specification (given its limited scope and complexity), so is definitely something that we should finalize and realize. My current plan is to align this with the switch to Java 11, which comes with much better built-in support for HTTP

Re: [basex-talk] Dr. Mike Kay's proposals for XPath and XQuery 4.0

2020-11-16 Thread Marco Lettere
Couple of things directly out of my mind even if more library than core language oriented are YAML support and the new proposal for convenient HTTP client functions. I remember a proposal by you, Christian, together with Adam maybe? M. On 16/11/20 15:30, Loren Cahlander wrote: Please make

Re: [basex-talk] Dr. Mike Kay's proposals for XPath and XQuery 4.0

2020-11-16 Thread Loren Cahlander
Please make sure to keep me in the loop. I will need to keep xqDoc up to date. > On Nov 16, 2020, at 6:28 AM, Christian Grün wrote: > >> I don't know how many implementers we have on this list, outside of >> Christian and co., but thought you all might find it interesting. > > Everyone:

Re: [basex-talk] Dr. Mike Kay's proposals for XPath and XQuery 4.0

2020-11-16 Thread Christian Grün
> I don't know how many implementers we have on this list, outside of Christian > and co., but thought you all might find it interesting. Everyone: raise your hands and get involved ;) Michael’s initiative to push for a new version of XQuery, XPath & co. is very promising indeed. If you are

[basex-talk] Dr. Mike Kay's proposals for XPath and XQuery 4.0

2020-11-14 Thread Bridger Dyson-Smith
Hi all - I imagine that Dr. Kay has posted about this in multiple places, but I don't know if he's posting on the BaseX list much. He shared the following links with his thoughts on XPath, XSLT, XQuery, and F version 4.0 [1] - I don't know how many implementers we have on this list, outside of