ailman.uni-konstanz.de
Objet : Re: [basex-talk] Performance issue with BaseX CLI
Hi again,
I had a quick look into the monitoring code, and I noticed two things:
1. It looks to me (correct me if I’m wrong) as if the code of the project
was initially written for Saxon and then ported to Bas
t;>
>> 00:02:36
>>
>> 06:44:06
>>
>> 10:05:21
>>
>> 03:21:15
>>
>> Check Multi schéma 2022 FRH
>>
>> 06:25:46
>>
>> 06:31:47
>>
>> 00:06:01
>>
>> 10:05:55
>>
>> 11:39:07
>>
>> 01:
:31:47
>
> 00:06:01
>
> 10:05:55
>
> 11:39:07
>
> 01:33:12
>
>
>
>
>
> *De :* Liam R. E. Quin
> *Envoyé :* samedi 20 avril 2024 05:00
> *À :* ANDRADE Antonio ;
> basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
> *Objet :* Re: [basex-talk] Performance issue wi
On Mon, 2024-04-22 at 08:54 +0200, ANDRADE Antonio wrote:
> At this moment, the XML document is not intended to be stored. This
> is why it is not loaded into a database before processing.
BaseX is designed to operate primarily on documents in the database,
which is why i suggest trying that.
Oth
an.uni-konstanz.de
Objet : Re: [basex-talk] Performance issue with BaseX CLI
On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 10:45 +0200, ANDRADE Antonio wrote:
Hie,
For the purposes of European Water Framework Directive reporting, I compared
the performances of the Saxon and BaseX XQuery engines.
First, you should consider
On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 10:45 +0200, ANDRADE Antonio wrote:
> Hie,
>
> For the purposes of European Water Framework Directive reporting, I
> compared the performances of the Saxon and BaseX XQuery engines.
First, you should consider (as i think Martin said) the Java runtime
startup time, typically
. The
Python/bash difference for the calling script does not seem to explain the
observed performance differences.
De : Hans-Juergen Rennau
Envoyé : vendredi 19 avril 2024 11:25
À : basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de; ANDRADE Antonio
Objet : Re: [basex-talk] Performance issue with BaseX CLI
Am 19.04.2024 um 10:45 schrieb ANDRADE Antonio:
Hie,
For the purposes of European Water Framework Directive reporting, I
compared the performances of the Saxon and BaseX XQuery engines. I
observe a performance gap of a factor of 100 to 200 depending on the
use case (see functions test_xquery_m
Hi Antonio,
my experience is very different - quite comparable performance, except for very
specific cases, e.g. massive use of fn:idref(). Furthermore, the performance of
BaseX is often so stupendous that an improvement by an order of magnitude (not
to mention two) appears to me very difficult
Hie,
For the purposes of European Water Framework Directive reporting, I
compared the performances of the Saxon and BaseX XQuery engines. I observe
a performance gap of a factor of 100 to 200 depending on the use case (see
functions test_xquery_monitoring() and test_xquery_multischema_2022() in
10 matches
Mail list logo