Re: Omitting fields from being displayed and enhanced editing

2001-08-06 Thread Robert Fenk
On Sunday, August 5 2001 02:30:59, Ronan Waide wrote: I don't know how much duplication of effort - if any - is involved in having both systems present. A few lines. Apparently my commit has broken the old behavior :/ but I have a fix already handy. What I think needs to be done is for

Re: Omitting fields from being displayed and enhanced editing

2001-08-06 Thread Alex Schroeder
Robert Fenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: bbdb-default-display-mode (bbdb-elided-display) either one-line, multi-line or 'full bbdb-pop-up-default-display-mode (bbdb-pop-up-elided-display) either one-line, multi-line or 'full I don't think the names should end in mode if we are not

Re: Omitting fields from being displayed and enhanced editing

2001-08-06 Thread Colin Rafferty
Robert Fenk wrote: On Sunday, August 5 2001 02:30:59, Ronan Waide wrote: What I think needs to be done is for bbdb-elided-display to go away (or be replaced with some aliasing and a bunch of warnings to say it /will/ go away), and be replaced with a combination of your code and the

Re: bbdb/vm problem

2001-08-06 Thread Colin Rafferty
Ronan Waide wrote: On August 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I think I've solved the problem - looking at my .bbbdb file, it has a header ;;; file-version: 6 ( ( ( ( ( ( then the records [ ...] ) ) ) ) ) ) I assume the round brackets shouldn't be there? I've hand edited

Re: Omitting fields from being displayed and enhanced editing

2001-08-06 Thread Robert Fenk
On Monday, August 6 2001 14:44:55, Alex Schroeder wrote: Robert Fenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: bbdb-default-display-mode (bbdb-elided-display) either one-line, multi-line or 'full bbdb-pop-up-default-display-mode (bbdb-pop-up-elided-display) either one-line, multi-line or 'full

possible bug in bbdb-search-simple (bbdb.el)

2001-08-06 Thread Joe Casadonte
Hi, Just started using bbdb with gnus and ran accross a bug today. I was entering a group (an IMAP INBOX) and got the following error: Wrong type argument: listp, [Joe Casadonte nil nil nil nil ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ((classification . me) (timestamp . 2001-08-05) (creation-date . 2001-08-05))

Re: Omitting fields from being displayed and enhanced editing

2001-08-06 Thread Ronan Waide
On August 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I hate changing names just for the sake of changing names. Yup, agreed, but it appears that the number of people who think of the word 'elided' when trying to figure out optional field display is getting smaller and smaller - I must confess to being

Re: possible bug in bbdb-search-simple (bbdb.el)

2001-08-06 Thread Alastair Burt
Joe Casadonte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Changing the following line in bbdb-search-simple seemed to fix this, but I'm not sure if I've changed things semantically or not. Actually, I'm pretty sure I did, but I think it was for the better: OLD:(setq answer (append recs

Mew bbdb-mew.el and bbdb-add-hook problem

2001-08-06 Thread Sean Rima
I am trying to intergrate bbdb into Mew 2.0. I am using the non cvs latest version of bbdb and bbdb-mew.el 1.2. When I try to use it I keep getting that bbdb-add-hook is void Section from bbdb-mew.el (defun bbdb-insinuate-mew () Call this function to hook BBDB into Mew. (bbdb-add-hook

Re: Omitting fields from being displayed and enhanced editing

2001-08-06 Thread Jochen Küpper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Fenk wrote on Mon, 6 Aug 2001 10:58:38 +0200: Robert bbdb-default-display-mode (bbdb-elided-display) Robert either one-line, multi-line or 'full Robert bbdb-pop-up-default-display-mode (bbdb-pop-up-elided-display) Robert either one-line,