On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Colin Rafferty spake:
Robert Fenk wrote:
bbdb-one-line-display-fields (bbdb-elided-display-fields)
list of fields which should be displayed in one-line display
This is the exact opposite of the -elided- version, and a bad choice.
If I add a new field interactively,
On Monday, August 6 2001 10:15:30, Colin Rafferty wrote:
[...]
I hate changing names just for the sake of changing names.
Well me too, but they are not just changed for the sake of
changing names, but also for minor functionality changes and
better naming.
Your are right,
If I (accidentally) modify .bbdb externally to my main BBDB process,
and then do M-x bbdb, BBDB asks me four times if I wish to revert. It
should only ask once, and then proceed with that answer.
Waider.
Emacs : GNU Emacs 20.7.1 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu, X toolkit)
of Fri Mar 16 2001 on
On Tuesday, August 7 2001 12:01:03, Ronan Waide wrote:
If I (accidentally) modify .bbdb externally to my main BBDB process,
and then do M-x bbdb, BBDB asks me four times if I wish to revert. It
should only ask once, and then proceed with that answer.
Happens only once for me.
I started Xemacs
On Tuesday, August 7 2001 08:19:53, Thomas E Deweese wrote:
[...]
There are minor functionality changes, that may or may not warrent
a name change, but 'better naming' _is_ just changing names for the
sake of changing names.
Well, we could argue on this for quite some while.
IMHO for the
Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I (accidentally) modify .bbdb externally to my main BBDB process,
and then do M-x bbdb, BBDB asks me four times if I wish to
revert. It should only ask once, and then proceed with that answer.
Heh, when I sync my pilot I usually have BBDB running in
Thomas E Deweese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are minor functionality changes, that may or may not warrent
a name change, but 'better naming' _is_ just changing names for the
sake of changing names.
it depends on why it is better...
the question is whom we want to inconvenience more.
