> This is a very cool function, but you seem to be in the middle of
> editing it.
Well now that you've corrected it :-) I did crank that out in less
than an hour several weeks ago and since it worked I didn't notice
> In `interactive', you ask for a record, but you then get the new notes
> from
David S. Goldberg wrote:
> (defun dsg-bbdb-duplicate-and-edit-record (record newname)
> "Duplicates the current record, prompting for a new value for name."
> (interactive (list (bbdb-get-record "Record to start from: ")
>(read-string "New Name: ")))
> (let ((omit-fields
On October 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> With some reprodcuible regularity, vm & bbdb complete to the *second*
> name, rather then the primary.
Bugs and suchlike aside, there is another issue here which collides
with doing this 'right':
Say I have a record for myself, that lists my addresses as
On October 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> recall several years ago lamenting that not only could I remember
> so-and-so's name, I couldn't even recall his /email address/.
Ahem. "could I not remember". English is HARD.
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
"There was
