Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When you use C-u M-x bbdb RET dan RET you will get the matching
> entries in "elided" form -- one line per entry. It works by
> temporarily switching bbdb-display-layout, but I must confess I
> didn't quite understand how it picked the layout to use ins
Hi,
I just read the following message on gnus.Emacs.source.
,
| Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
`
The message contained the header
,
| Organization: SFB 378, Computerlinguistik, Universität des Saarlandes
`
which was automatically added to the corresponding bbdb-entry as
,
| =
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:09:53 -0400 Michael Richardson wrote:
Michael> Does someone have a simple formula to update the timestamp every time
Michael> the record is viewed? I think this may be a FAQ, but I haven't found it
Michael> on the web pages.
Check out bbdb-expire.
I attach the file I have
On Tue, 25 May 2004 10:14:19 +0200 Xavier Maillard wrote:
zeDek> The trick was to use the X- headers for that. Then it was possible to
zeDek> tell PGG to automatically sign/encrypt messages for those people.
For the second part there is bbdb-pgp.el.
Greetings,
Jochen
--
Einigkeit und Recht u
On 22 May 2004 12:07:13 -0400 Kenneth Jacker wrote:
Kenneth> A second mystery: after displaying all records, the created ".tex"
Kenneth> file contains only, maybe, 20% of them. Why are these other entries
Kenneth> not included in the "pretty printing"?
Maybe your cusomization?
,[ C-h v bbdb
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 07:55:03 +0200 Fabian Braennstroem wrote:
Fabian> Jochen Küpper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I asked that before, Fabian; please also try it after running
>> bbdb-define-all-aliases on the same message buffer.
Fabian> Yes, I know, but I don't have such it function...
Which
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 18:07:52 +0200 Kai Grossjohann wrote:
Kai> Fabian Braennstroem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> mail-alias: TU
^^
>> As you can see, I have a mail-alias 'TU', but when writing this and
>> afterwards pressing TAB, I just see the addresses which have a
>> be
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 01:34:19 +0200 Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote:
Robert> On Monday, April 12, 2004 at 10:58:02, Jochen Küpper wrote:
>> I do not want entries from mailer-daemons in my bbdb, so I configure
>> bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all, but it doesn't work.
Robert> You want one of the bbdb-ignore*-h
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:19:15 +0200 Fabian Braennstroem wrote:
Fabian> Thanks! But somehow I am not able to insert the alias!?
What, where?
You cannot insert the alias in the bbdb? Or you cannot expand it in a
message buffer?
Greetings,
Jochen
Followup-To: poster
--
Einigkeit und Recht und Fre
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 08:04:22 +0200 Fabian Braennstroem wrote:
Fabian> when I get a mail with a lot of 'cc'-addresses, how can I save
Fabian> them in bbdb.
Are you looking for this?
,[ C-h f bbdb/gnus-show-all-recipients RET ]
| bbdb/gnus-show-all-recipients is an interactive compiled Lisp fun
,
| GNU Emacs 21.2.1 (i686-pc-cygwin, X toolkit) of 2003-01-23 on DRACO
| No Gnus v0.2
| BBDB version 2.35 ($Date: 2004/03/22 15:23:33 $)
`
I do not want entries from mailer-daemons in my bbdb, so I configure
bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all, but it doesn't work.
,[ C-h v bbdb-auto-notes-ig
If I run
,
| (message-fetch-field "from")
`
on a message with the following From line (changed for content)
,
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Klaas XXX)
`
I get the following result:
,
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Klaas XXX) domaintypecountry
`
Since gnus-fetch-field uses message-fetch-
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:00:18 +0100 Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote:
Robert> Index: bbdb.el
Robert> ===
Robert> RCS file: /cvsroot/bbdb/bbdb/lisp/bbdb.el,v
Robert> retrieving revision 1.216
Robert> diff -r1.216 bbdb.el
Robert> 3174a3182
Robe
I am having problems with auto-creation of bbdb-entries.
I use bbdb and Gnus from cvs on Emacs-21.2.1/Cygwin.
,[from .emacs]
| bbdb/mail-auto-create-p t
| bbdb/news-auto-create-p t
`
This started some time ago (sorry, don't remember when) but used to
work at some
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 03:36:07 +0100 Alex Schroeder wrote:
Alex> Jochen Küpper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alex> I wonder where this is documented, though.
>>
>> ,[ (info "(bbdb)Mail Sending Interfaces") ]
>> |If more than one person has the same mail-alias, then that alias
>> | expands to
On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 22:29:03 +0100 Alex Schroeder wrote:
Alex> No. Assume you have two records in your BBDB, A and B. For both,
Alex> use C-o to create a new field called 'mail-alias' and use "foo" as
Alex> the field value. Now, when you compose your next message, use
Alex> foo TAB to expand th
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 21:56:45 -0500 Joe Corneli wrote:
Joe> I wanted to write to request a simple feature: that bbdb
Joe> recognize the list affilliations (eg. bbdb-info, gnu-emacs-help,
Joe> etc.) of incoming mail, and include that information in the
Joe> summary that accompanies people's names.
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gnu.emacs.gnus as well.
On 15 Aug 2003 09:48:15 -0700 Bill Harris wrote:
Bill> I tried to install bbdb 2.23 on an XP system using Emacs 21.2.1
^^_ 34
Bill> ,
Bill> | bash-2.05b$ mak
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gnu.emacs.gnus as well.
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:34:23 +0200 marcuirl wrote:
marcuirl> Thanks Jochen, but I have that in my .emacs already. In the
marcuirl> To: field I type football and don't get it completed to
marcui
Please send your followup to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:13:15 +0200 marcuirl wrote:
marcuirl> marcuirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Jochen Küpper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> ,
>>> | bbdb-submit-bug-report
>>> `
Haven't seen that on the bbdb list yet.
marcuirl> oka
Current cvs contains a screwed-up version of the mentioned file. I.e.
,[lines 126--128]
| (defcustom bbdb/pgp-quiet nil
| "*Do not ask for confirmation on pgp-action.
| (defun bbdb/pgp-get-pgp (name address)
`
I attach a patch from the current version to my local copy.
Greetings,
Jochen
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 18:33:22 +0100 Ronan Waide wrote:
Ronan> On August 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> Am I mistaken in thinking that this patch changes every instance of
>> "quiet" to "quite"? I don't quite understand why, and decided not
>> to be quiet about it.
Ooops, better I watch out which wo
On 29 Mar 2003 15:11:08 -0500 Scott Lawrence wrote:
Scott> Jochen Küpper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Waider has said repeatedly that she doesn't wanna increase the hurdle
>> for novices to get their problems reported...
Scott> I think the more important issue is getting them _heard_ and
Scott
23 matches
Mail list logo
