On Thursday, January 3, 2002 at 11:36:17, Steve Youngs wrote:
[...]
> BBDB notices things in the gnus-article-buffer where the unseen headers
> don't exist so it can't notice changes. The headers aren't really
> hidden at all, they just aren't there.
[...]
> How close am I to getting that right,
|--==> "JM" == Jeff Mincy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JM> From: Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
JM> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:30:59 +0100
JM> On Wednesday, January 2, 2002 at 17:41:14, Steve Youngs wrote:
>>Hey Folks!
>>I finally
From: Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:30:59 +0100
On Wednesday, January 2, 2002 at 17:41:14, Steve Youngs wrote:
> Hey Folks!
>
> I finally got sick of BBDB not noticing things in hidden headers (like
> X-Face's), so I wro
|--==> "RF" == Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RF> On Wednesday, January 2, 2002 at 17:41:14, Steve Youngs wrote:
>>I finally got sick of BBDB not noticing things in hidden headers (like
>>X-Face's), so I wrote this horrible little hack:
On Wednesday, January 2, 2002 at 17:41:14, Steve Youngs wrote:
> Hey Folks!
>
> I finally got sick of BBDB not noticing things in hidden headers (like
> X-Face's), so I wrote this horrible little hack:
[...]
> The downside is that, OMG it's so slow. :-( Does anyone
Hey Folks!
I finally got sick of BBDB not noticing things in hidden headers (like
X-Face's), so I wrote this horrible little hack:
,
| (defun steve-bbdb-auto-notes-hook (record)
| "Runs `bbdb-auto-notes-hook' after doing a `gnus-summary-toggle-header'.
|
| This is becau
