On February 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Aha. You should really get it from the sourceforge site, as waider.ie
tends to lag behind by a day or two. I should fix that, of course.
Augh. I didn't even realise waider.ie *was* a mirror!
Again, probably something I should fix. Or at least
Yes, doubly sure. are you doubly sure I'm looking at the same tarball
as you? From the transcript below you will see the one I'm getting
looks awfully like yesterday's... where should I be getting it from?
Patrick
$ wget -Y off http://www.waider.ie/hacks/emacs/bbdb/bbdb-2.3.tar.gz
Aha. You should really get it from the sourceforge site, as waider.ie
tends to lag behind by a day or two. I should fix that, of course.
Augh. I didn't even realise waider.ie *was* a mirror!
Works a lot better now, thanks. Don't expect to hear me complain
again until I find another bug in
On February 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Yes, doubly sure. are you doubly sure I'm looking at the same tarball
as you? From the transcript below you will see the one I'm getting
looks awfully like yesterday's... where should I be getting it from?
Patrick
$ wget -Y off
I must just be unlucky. Ronan's mail claiming that my grave
completion bug was fixed tempted me to update once again from the
nightly tarball. Yes - the completion works, but now the bbdb/rmail
interface is broken.
It looks rather as if bbdb/rmail-update-record expects
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hmmm, that's what testing is for.
Certainly. However, it helps if you specify the error rather than just
saying that there is one. BBDB is not an easy thing to test.
Both the errors should be fixed in current CVS (note: the tarball
doesn't get
Okay, I'm looking into this. There's more broken than that, and I
can't understand how I missed it. For now, you can set
bbdb-message-caching-enabled to nil and work away.
I tried that but still got a different error somewhere else.
Please post the error. I can't fix these
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It looks rather as if bbdb/rmail-update-record expects
bbdb-message-cache-lookup to accept two arguments; it used to, but
today it doesn't.
Okay, I'm looking into this. There's more broken than that, and I
can't understand how I missed it. For now,
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It looks rather as if bbdb/rmail-update-record expects
bbdb-message-cache-lookup to accept two arguments; it used to, but
today it doesn't.
Okay, I'm looking into this. There's more broken than that, and I
can't understand how I missed it.
It looks rather as if bbdb/rmail-update-record expects
bbdb-message-cache-lookup to accept two arguments; it used to, but
today it doesn't.
Okay, I'm looking into this. There's more broken than that, and I
can't understand how I missed it. For now, you can set
10 matches
Mail list logo
