Re: Patch for BBDB-2.2 - mail-abbrevs/mail-aliases inconsistency

2000-07-19 Thread Kevin Davidson
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kevin Davidson ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thomas E Deweese ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Thomas> Is is possible you have a local copy of bbdb-search-simple? tkld> No. I've used a fresh Xemacs and added just the BBDB

Re: Patch for BBDB-2.2 - mail-abbrevs/mail-aliases inconsistency

2000-07-19 Thread Thomas E Deweese
> "tkld" == Kevin Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thomas E Deweese ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Thomas> Is is possible you have a local copy of bbdb-search-simple? tkld> No. I've used a fresh Xemacs and added just the BBDB 2.2 lisp tkld> directory

Re: Patch for BBDB-2.2 - mail-abbrevs/mail-aliases inconsistency

2000-07-19 Thread Kevin Davidson
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thomas E Deweese ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Thomas> Is is possible you have a local copy of bbdb-search-simple? No. I've used a fresh Xemacs and added just the BBDB 2.2 lisp directory to the load-path. bbdb-search-simple always returns this pair

Re: Patch for BBDB-2.2 - mail-abbrevs/mail-aliases inconsistency

2000-07-18 Thread Thomas E Deweese
On July 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >>> I'm also getting some other strange behaviour that I expect is >>> something I've done, rather than a bug in BBDB. >>> gnus-bbdb-summary-get-author has started failing with a wrong type >>> error. It looks like bbdb-search-simple is now returning something >

Re: Patch for BBDB-2.2 - mail-abbrevs/mail-aliases inconsistency

2000-07-18 Thread Kevin Davidson
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ronan Waide ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ronan> On July 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> >> >> Wrong type argument: arrayp, (["Thomas E." "Deweese" nil "Kodak" nil nil >("[EMAIL PROTECTED]") ((creation-date . "2000-07-13") (notes . "SyncBBDB >author") (pilo

Re: Patch for BBDB-2.2 - mail-abbrevs/mail-aliases inconsistency

2000-07-18 Thread Ronan Waide
On July 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > Wrong type argument: arrayp, (["Thomas E." "Deweese" nil "Kodak" nil nil >("[EMAIL PROTECTED]") ((creation-date . "2000-07-13") (notes . "SyncBBDB >author") (pilot-id . "15007837") (timestamp . "2000-07-13") (timezone . "-0400") >(x-mailer . "VM 6.72

Patch for BBDB-2.2 - mail-abbrevs/mail-aliases inconsistency

2000-07-18 Thread Kevin Davidson
Having just upgraded to BBDB 2.2 I've come across a bug I'd fixed in my own sources a while ago. When bbdb-define-all-aliases does its magic it uses inconsistent tests to determine whether to use mail-abbrevs (FSF ?) or mail-aliases (Xemacs ?). The first test is fine (fboundp &#x

Re:proper use of mail-abbrevs

1994-05-02 Thread Gregory Tucker-Kellogg
I'm an idiot, so you can ignore my previous message. (require 'mail-abbrevs) was being called AFTER (bbdb-define-all-aliases). -- Gregory W. Tucker-Kellogg Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology Harvard Medical School, Boston MA 02115 (617) 432-0930 or (617) 432-3212

proper use of mail-abbrevs

1994-05-02 Thread Gregory Tucker-Kellogg
Hello, I'm using bbdb 1.50 and VM 5.66 (but I don't think this is a VM problem). My .emacs file contains the lines (add-hook 'mail-setup-hook '(lambda () (bbdb-define-all-aliases) (setq mail-self-blind t)

mail-abbrevs

1994-04-11 Thread Gregory Tucker-Kellogg
when I ask about mail-aliases, I get the response: mail-aliases's value is nil What am I missing to get the aliases done properly? My .emacs includes: (add-hook 'mail-setup-hook '(lambda () (require 'mail-abbrevs)