Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5

2012-12-09 Thread Dennis
Yes, please do. That list is a great start. Both of the rounded ends of the Live Search text input field look a little off too. On Sunday, December 9, 2012 10:04:20 AM UTC-8, François Schiettecatte wrote: > > Martin > > You should file a report with Bare Bones Software Technical Support @ > su

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5

2012-12-09 Thread François Schiettecatte
Martin You should file a report with Bare Bones Software Technical Support @ supp...@barebones.com François On Dec 9, 2012, at 12:41 PM, Martin Hairer wrote: > This is of course minor, but there are still quite a few small icons that > show up at low resolution on a retina screen. Here's a (

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5

2012-12-09 Thread Martin Hairer
This is of course minor, but there are still quite a few small icons that show up at low resolution on a retina screen. Here's a (possibly not exhaustive) list: - The "close" button in the "Currently Open Documents" list. - The "Project", "Scripts" and "Clippings" icons in the menu bar. - The "G

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5

2012-12-04 Thread Miraz Jordan
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012, Rich Siegel wrote: > > A complete digest of the changes is available here: > > > > > > > I was just skimming the release notes. I imag

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5

2012-12-04 Thread Lorin Rivers
Awesome! Keep up the good work, dudes! -- Lorin Rivers Mosasaur: Killer Technical Marketing 512/203.3198 (m) -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups. To post to th

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5

2012-12-04 Thread April Mains
Cancel that its working now. April On 2012-12-04, at 1:01 PM, April Mains wrote: > Using Check for updates within BBEdit gives the following error: > Software Update Check Failed: A server with the specified hostname > could not be found. > > Thought you might need to know that. > > A

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5

2012-12-04 Thread April Mains
Using Check for updates within BBEdit gives the following error: Software Update Check Failed: A server with the specified hostname could not be found. Thought you might need to know that. April On 2012-12-04, at 12:54 PM, Rich Siegel wrote: > Good { morning, afternoon, evening }, >

[ANN] BBEdit 10.5

2012-12-04 Thread Rich Siegel
Good { morning, afternoon, evening }, We are pleased to announce the release and immediate availability of BBEdit 10.5. This is a free update for anyone using BBEdit 10.0.x or 10.1.x, and includes a number of feature additions (including, but by no means limited to, high-resolution operation

[ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3239) pre-release

2012-11-26 Thread Rich Siegel
Good { morning, afternoon, evening }, The 10.5 public beta's rolling right along -- thanks to everyone who's taken the time to try it out and let us know how it's working, for better or for worse. :-) A new build is available, with an assortment of fixes for things that turned up in the prev

[ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3237) pre-release

2012-11-20 Thread Rich Siegel
Good { morning, afternoon, evening }, The 10.5 public beta's rolling right along -- thanks to everyone who's taken the time to try it out and let us know how it's working, for better or for worse. :-) A new build is available, with an assortment of fixes for things that turned up in the prev

[ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3235) pre-release

2012-11-19 Thread Rich Siegel
Good { morning, afternoon, evening }, The 10.5 public beta's rolling right along -- thanks to everyone who's taken the time to try it out and let us know how it's working, for better or for worse. :-) A new build is available, with an assortment of fixes for things that turned up in the prev

[ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3233) pre-release

2012-11-16 Thread Rich Siegel
Good { morning, afternoon, evening }, The 10.5 public beta's rolling right along -- thanks to everyone who's taken the time to try it out and let us know how it's working, for better or for worse. :-) A new build is available, with an assortment of fixes for things that turned up in the prev

[ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3231) pre-release

2012-11-13 Thread Rich Siegel
Good { morning, afternoon, evening }, The 10.5 public beta's rolling right along -- thanks to everyone who's taken the time to try it out and let us know how it's working, for better or for worse. :-) A new build is available, with an assortment of fixes for things that turned up in the prev

[ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3229) pre-release

2012-11-08 Thread Rich Siegel
Good { morning, afternoon, evening }, The 10.5 public beta's rolling right along -- thanks to everyone who's taken the time to try it out and let us know how it's working, for better or for worse. :-) A new build is available, with an assortment of fixes for things that turned up in the prev

[ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3227) pre-release

2012-11-06 Thread Rich Siegel
Good { morning, afternoon, evening }, The 10.5 public beta's rolling right along -- thanks to everyone who's taken the time to try it out and let us know how it's working, for better or for worse. :-) A new build is available, with an assortment of fixes for things that turned up in the prev

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3223) pre-release

2012-11-03 Thread BBunny
LOL! I have sent many people to the BBEdit home page to see the tagline, "It still doesn't suck." On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 11:14:43 PM UTC-7, Robert W. Franson wrote: > > Aside from the sheer usefulness of BBEdit, we love Bare Bones for > technical writing gems like this: > > On Oct 31, 2

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3223) pre-release

2012-11-01 Thread Bucky Junior
On Nov 1, 2012, at 12:14 AM, Robert W. Franson wrote: > Aside from the sheer usefulness of BBEdit, we love Bare Bones for technical > writing gems like this: > > On Oct 31, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Rich Siegel wrote: > >> The "current process" indicator in shell worksheets now >> has a spinny thing

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3223) pre-release

2012-11-01 Thread Robert W. Franson
Aside from the sheer usefulness of BBEdit, we love Bare Bones for technical writing gems like this: On Oct 31, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Rich Siegel wrote: > The "current process" indicator in shell worksheets now >has a spinny thing so that you know something's running, and a >clicky thing if y

[ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3223) pre-release

2012-10-31 Thread Rich Siegel
Good { morning, afternoon, evening }, The 10.5 public beta's rolling right along -- thanks to everyone who's taken the time to try it out and let us know how it's working, for better or for worse. :-) A new build is available, with an assortment of fixes for things that turned up in the prev

[ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3221) pre-release

2012-10-23 Thread Rich Siegel
Good { morning, afternoon, evening }, The 10.5 public beta's rolling right along -- thanks to everyone who's taken the time to try it out and let us know how it's working, for better or for worse. :-) A new build is available, with an assortment of fixes for things that turned up in the prev

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3219) pre-release

2012-10-08 Thread Bucky Junior
On Oct 8, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Rich Siegel wrote: > you're under no obligation to install and use anything but a public release. > :-) I've never felt _obligated_ to use BBEdit, perhaps _compelled_ would be a better choice of words. I _choose_ to use BBEdit of my own free will...don't I? Bucky

[ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3219) pre-release

2012-10-08 Thread Rich Siegel
Good { morning, afternoon, evening }, The 10.5 public beta's off to a hot start -- thanks to everyone who's taken the time to try it out and let us know how it's working, for better or for worse. :-) A new build is available, with an assortment of fixes for things that turned up in the previ

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3215) pre-release

2012-10-04 Thread Rod Buchanan
On Oct 3, 2012, at 9:51 AM, Gribnif wrote: > On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 10:25:27 AM UTC-4, Rich Siegel wrote: > It might be worth considering migrating to Subversion; the > conversion from CVS is pretty straightforward, and svn is > generally easier to work with on modern OS and hardware > p

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3215) pre-release

2012-10-04 Thread Gribnif
On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 10:25:27 AM UTC-4, Rich Siegel wrote: > > It might be worth considering migrating to Subversion; the > conversion from CVS is pretty straightforward, and svn is > generally easier to work with on modern OS and hardware > platforms. The time spent migrating vs. the t

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3215) pre-release

2012-10-03 Thread Rod Buchanan
On Oct 3, 2012, at 9:25 AM, Rich Siegel wrote: > On Wednesday, October 3, 2012, Rod Buchanan wrote: > >> That's an idea. I already have a shell script to replicate the "Compare >> Revisions...", looks like I'll be learning AppleScript. :) > > It might be worth considering migrating to Subvers

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3215) pre-release

2012-10-03 Thread Rich Siegel
On Wednesday, October 3, 2012, Rod Buchanan wrote: That's an idea. I already have a shell script to replicate the "Compare Revisions...", looks like I'll be learning AppleScript. :) It might be worth considering migrating to Subversion; the conversion from CVS is pretty straightforward, a

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3215) pre-release

2012-10-03 Thread Rod Buchanan
On Oct 3, 2012, at 12:01 AM, Christopher Stone wrote: > On Oct 02, 2012, at 09:52, Rod Buchanan wrote: >> Yeah, I'll need to set those up I guess. I have keystrokes mapped to the >> commit and diff actions, and it is so much easier to use those than enter >> commands in Terminal. >> >> Still

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3215) pre-release

2012-10-02 Thread Christopher Stone
On Oct 02, 2012, at 09:52, Rod Buchanan wrote: > Yeah, I'll need to set those up I guess. I have keystrokes mapped to the > commit and diff actions, and it is so much easier to use those than enter > commands in Terminal. > > Still bummed. :( ___

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3217) pre-release

2012-10-02 Thread WordWeaver
Thanks for fixing the copy and paste issue, Rich. Much appreciated! -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedi

[ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3217) pre-release

2012-10-02 Thread Rich Siegel
Good { morning, afternoon, evening }, The 10.5 public beta's off to a hot start -- thanks to everyone who's taken the time to try it out and let us know how it's working, for better or for worse. :-) A new build is available, with an assortment of fixes for things that turned up in the previ

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3215) pre-release

2012-10-02 Thread Rod Buchanan
On Oct 1, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Christopher Stone wrote: > On Oct 01, 2012, at 10:42, Rod Buchanan wrote: >>> As it says in the docs accompanying Rich's notice: CVS has been removed. >> >> Thanks. I hadn't read that far yet. > __

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3215) pre-release

2012-10-01 Thread Ken Lanxner
Thanks much for this one. I think I am going to be using this new Site action menu all the time. I like the background color in the file list, too. And the clippings palette in two columns. And hiding the project list so I can just show open documents. Oh and restoring easy access to recent

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3215) pre-release

2012-10-01 Thread Christopher Stone
On Oct 01, 2012, at 10:42, Rod Buchanan wrote: >> As it says in the docs accompanying Rich's notice: CVS has been removed. > > Thanks. I hadn't read that far yet. __ Hey Rod, That's what 'find' is for. :) > (This sucks big

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3215) pre-release

2012-10-01 Thread Rod Buchanan
On Oct 1, 2012, at 10:33 AM, Brian Frick wrote: > As it says in the docs accompanying Rich's notice: CVS has been removed. Thanks. I hadn't read that far yet. :( (This sucks big time by the way. We have a ton of code in CVS.) -- Rod Buchanan -- -- You received this message because you ar

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3215) pre-release

2012-10-01 Thread Brian Frick
As it says in the docs accompanying Rich's notice: CVS has been removed. -- Brian Frick brianfr...@gmail.com On Oct 1, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Rod Buchanan wrote: > On Sep 30, 2012, at 9:00 PM, Rich Siegel wrote: > >> Good { morning, afternoon, evening }, >> >> We've been busy. :-) A new version

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3215) pre-release

2012-10-01 Thread Rod Buchanan
On Sep 30, 2012, at 9:00 PM, Rich Siegel wrote: > Good { morning, afternoon, evening }, > > We've been busy. :-) A new version is in the works, with a whole bunch of new > features, refinements, and improvements. We're happy to make a pre-release > build available to the list, so that you have

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3215) pre-release

2012-09-30 Thread Miraz Jordan
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Rich Siegel wrote: > *** BBEdit 10.5 contains extensive internal rework; the primary goal > is to achieve proper appearance on Macs with the high-resolution > "Retina" displays Having installed and opened, let me just say "A". Gorgeous! Thank you, thank

[ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3215) pre-release

2012-09-30 Thread Rich Siegel
Good { morning, afternoon, evening }, We've been busy. :-) A new version is in the works, with a whole bunch of new features, refinements, and improvements. We're happy to make a pre-release build available to the list, so that you have a little extra time to play with it before the rest of t