+1
I must agree that you've added many steps to a simple task.
Can we put the old dialog content in the new "pop up" style dialog?
Please.
On Aug 7, 11:07 am, edac2 wrote:
> I thought I might have been a little harsh with the comment
> "completely useless", but after testing the samedialogbox i
Interesting. There are more options than meets the eye, but you need
to know what they are in order to be able to select them by first
letter. This is ridiculously unintuitive and takes several times
longer than it used to. Plus, let's say you do invoke "target", you
still have to type it in rather
At 11:18 p -0600 08/03/2011, LuKreme didst inscribe upon an electronic papyrus:
Mark squaked out on Wed 03-Aug-2011 08:54
>
> start at top with cmd-T
Shift-Ctrl-W toggles ³Wrap around² as ³Start at top² is meaningless
in a non-modal dialog.
Eh? That's in reference to the document, not
On 8 Aug 2011, at 01:07, edac2 wrote:
> But as a for instance, I selected a word that I
> wanted to add a hyperlink to by pressing command-option-a. In BBEdit
> 9.6, a beautiful modal dialog box opens up. The first field is for
> Href, very logically. There are pulldowns for Recent URLs, Current
>
I thought I might have been a little harsh with the comment
"completely useless", but after testing the same dialog box in
versions 9.6 and 10, I stand by that assessment. Unfortunately it
doesn't look like this forum allows image uploads so that I can
illustrate my point. But as a for instance, I
Yes! I loved that I could edit an HTML tag by right clicking and
hitting Edit Tag. Wtih the most common attributes available, I could
make minor mods very quickly by checking a box and entering a value.
Now, I have to find the attribute, selected it, then type in the value
out of my head - no assis
On Thursday, August 4, 2011, Mark wrote:
Can I ask what the reason for that is? As a developer, I can
understand not wanting to maintain two separate bits of code to deal
with the find dialog, but I'm wondering what instigated the move away
from the modal find dial in the first place. What pr
On Aug 3, 4:02 pm, Rich Siegel wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 3, 2011, Mark wrote:
> >I'd really like to see the modal find dialog box back again as well.
>
> I regret to inform you that the modal Find dialog is gone for good.
Can I ask what the reason for that is? As a developer, I can
understa
Mark squaked out on Wed 03-Aug-2011 08:54
>
> I can no longer toggle grep with cmd-G,
Shift-Ctrl-G
> case sensitivity with cmd-N,
Shift-Ctrl-N
> multi-file search with cmd-M,
Nope, that’s different dialog.
> start at top with cmd-T
Shift-Ctrl-W toggles “Wrap around” as “Start at top” is me
Good morning,
On 3/08/11 at 10:24 AM -0700, edac2 wrote:
I'm sorry to hear that modal dialog boxes are gone for good. What if
the new, non-modal boxes were redesigned to be as big as the old,
modal boxes and had all of the same fields as they used to? Then they
could be cool AND useful, instea
I'm sorry to hear that modal dialog boxes are gone for good. What if
the new, non-modal boxes were redesigned to be as big as the old,
modal boxes and had all of the same fields as they used to? Then they
could be cool AND useful, instead of cool and completely useless as
they are now.
--
You rec
Mark sez:
>I'd really like to see the modal find dialog box back again as well.
>With the new(ish)* non-modal find dialog box, I can no longer toggle
>grep with cmd-G, case sensitivity with cmd-N, multi-file search with
>cmd-M, start at top with cmd-T and Match entire words with cmd-E.
>
>I'll wi
On Wednesday, August 3, 2011, Mark wrote:
I'd really like to see the modal find dialog box back again as well.
I regret to inform you that the modal Find dialog is gone for good.
With the new(ish)* non-modal find dialog box, I can no longer toggle
grep with cmd-G, case sensitivity with cmd-
I'd really like to see the modal find dialog box back again as well.
With the new(ish)* non-modal find dialog box, I can no longer toggle
grep with cmd-G, case sensitivity with cmd-N, multi-file search with
cmd-M, start at top with cmd-T and Match entire words with cmd-E.
I'll willingly use the ne
I have to agree with you. And having to manually enter and edit
information such as image dimensions that BBedit used to enter
for me --- that not only means a *lot* more work for me but also
a far greater likelihood of inaccuracy. I'll have to start using
Update Images more now. :-)
Ken
cam
I know that, but they shouldn't take "getting used to"; the old ones
were perfect. The new dialogs are too small and precious to be of any
use. Why can't I have the classic style dialogs as an option?
On Jul 21, 1:24 pm, Wrong Size Glass wrote:
> The new edit boxes do take a bit of getting used t
The new edit boxes do take a bit of getting used to.
You can automatically add additional parameters by clicking the small
'gear' in the upper right corner of the edit box.
WSG
On Jul 20, 7:15 pm, edac2 wrote:
> The so-called modal-less edit boxes are impossible to use. I don't see
> how this
The so-called modal-less edit boxes are impossible to use. I don't see
how this feature is an improvement. If I'm adding a URL, the classic
Anchor edit box, for instance, had clearly defined fields for Href:,
ID/Name, Title and Target. The Image edit box was similarly clear and
simple to use. The n
18 matches
Mail list logo
