My program runs fine but requires that I use putty.exe and type sudo python
myprog.py to run it. I have been reading about systemctl and have written a
service file and put it in /lib/systemd/system. It's called
paint-flow.service, listing below. I have.. enabled it with systemctl
enable
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:46 PM, William Hermans wrote:
> Robert,
>
> Your linux-images packages clean up after themselves if running sudo
> apt-get remove --purge on old unwanted images ?
>
> I can't recall doing this, but perhaps I should have been doing things
> this way as
No. It uses the actual shipping image and scripts geared toward the
external test HW to do the test. Just basic Linux commands.
Gerald
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Mike Tomovich wrote:
> Thanks for that, Gerald.
>
> Is any of the test software for the beaglebone available?
Now after all that I've decided not to write anything to the eMMC, fearing
that I'll cause some hiccup with the writes.
John
johnbakeree.blogspot.com
On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 11:24:18 AM UTC-7, John Baker wrote:
>
> Gosh, how did I miss that, that the mode is a string. Well it had to be
>
william@beaglebone:~$ *ls /boot/*
SOC.sh config-3.8.13-bone70
initrd.img-3.8.13-bone70 uboot
System.map-3.8.13-bone70 config-4.1.12-bone-rt-r16
initrd.img-4.1.12-bone-rt-r16 vmlinuz-3.8.13-bone70
System.map-4.1.12-bone-rt-r16 config-4.1.14-bone-rt-r17
Robert,
Your linux-images packages clean up after themselves if running sudo
apt-get remove --purge on old unwanted images ?
I can't recall doing this, but perhaps I should have been doing things this
way as it's much easier. I do recall using rm -rf on a couple occasions
however . . .
On Thu,
william@beaglebone:~$ *apt-cache search linux-image |grep 4.1*
Too much output here to view. Narrow search parameters assuming I want a
*bone* kernel, and not ti kernel.
william@beaglebone:~$ *apt-cache search linux-image |grep 4.1*bone**
linux-image-4.0.4-bone4 - Linux kernel, version
Thanks for that, Gerald.
Is any of the test software for the beaglebone available? Maybe some sort
of script that runs through and turns on/uses the peripherals during a test?
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Gerald Coley wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:14 PM,
>
> *It's more then just the config's, remoteproc_pruss utilized the same
> device tree node as uio_pruss, but changed things incompatiblly..*
>
> *remoteproc_pruss:*
>
>
> *https://github.com/RobertCNelson/linux-stable-rcn-ee/blob/4.1.18-ti-r56/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi#L854-L899
>
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:14 PM, wrote:
> We are building an AM335X based board, and I was hoping someone could help
> shed some light on the beaglebone test/burn in process during
> manufacturing. I have read a few posts 'about' the process, but I have not
> really seen a
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:06 PM, William Hermans wrote:
> Pedro,
>
> It would not be too hard to diff the config' between the two kernel types.
> As I recall there are two kernel config options that need enabling for
> uio_pruss to work. However, remoteproc_pruss also has to be
We are building an AM335X based board, and I was hoping someone could help
shed some light on the beaglebone test/burn in process during
manufacturing. I have read a few posts 'about' the process, but I have not
really seen a procedure/details on test hardware/test software to run.
Pedro,
It would not be too hard to diff the config' between the two kernel types.
As I recall there are two kernel config options that need enabling for
uio_pruss to work. However, remoteproc_pruss also has to be diabled, and
I'm not sure how thats done. Not to mention at this point I'm not 100%
On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 5:23:55 PM UTC-5, Injun Ear wrote:
>
> On the BeagleBone Black GPIOs, what is the difference between output
> pull-up, output pull-down, and output no pull?
>
>
> In other MCUs I have worked with, pull-up and pull-down are only applied
> to inputs. But I have
You need to export the Allegro files in ascii format and then Altium can import
those files. Copper pours and other polygons have to be redone because the
import creates hundreds of edges for each polygon. Also, some of the parts have
to be fixed. Synchronize the schematic with PCB in Altium
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM, pedrohbtp wrote:
> Here it seems like the uio_pruss works for the Bone kernel I used.
> But would you have any tips on how I should go with respect to try making
> uio_pruss work on TI kernels?
>
So TI's been working on a replacement for
Here it seems like the uio_pruss works for the Bone kernel I used.
But would you have any tips on how I should go with respect to try making
uio_pruss work on TI kernels?
Maybe you think it might be possible to sample with consistent 1ms period
some other way not using the PRU.
Thank you very
Also for what it's worth, and this is pure speculation( because I have not
looked into it fully ) but I do believe map0-map7 all point to the same
memory location. It would not be too hard to test to see if my assumption
is accurate, but I have not had the time lately for this specifically.
On
Robert,
Yes, I had noticed, the 8 separate "maps", and figured that was how it was
supposed to be. Despite an older blogpost I was reading aying there was
only one pool. Also, I'd have to revisit my notes, but I believe that uio
"map" tool does not find the mmap()'d memory either. But, all the
Hi Robert and William. Thank you very much for the responses!
I did the following:
root@beaglebone:/sys/class/uio# uname -r
4.1.21-bone-rt-r20
root@beaglebone:/sys/class/uio# lsmod | grep uio
uio_pruss 4582 0
uio_pdrv_genirq 3309 0
uio 8311 2
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Robert Nelson
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:30 AM, William Hermans
> wrote:
>
>> *I was taking a look at chapter 13 yesterday with (v4.1.x-bone), which
>>> has uio_pruss however the uio class doesn't match up
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:30 AM, William Hermans wrote:
> *I was taking a look at chapter 13 yesterday with (v4.1.x-bone), which has
>> uio_pruss however the uio class doesn't match up 100% either..*
>>
>
> Robert, what do you mean by this ? I've had 4.1.*bone* working with
>
> *I was taking a look at chapter 13 yesterday with (v4.1.x-bone), which has
> uio_pruss however the uio class doesn't match up 100% either..*
>
Robert, what do you mean by this ? I've had 4.1.*bone* working with uio
seemingly fine. Which is to say I do not doubt you, just wondering if there
is
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:41 PM, wrote:
> Hi! I have an application where I need to have consistent time sampling of
> some sensors (for instance, sampling every 1ms second) and that it uses
> little power.
> My solution for using little power is to set the processor to
Can you help me convert LDCK from alegro Orcad to Altium files
--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
Hi! I have an application where I need to have consistent time sampling of
some sensors (for instance, sampling every 1ms second) and that it uses
little power.
My solution for using little power is to set the processor to sleep every
once in a while using *rtcwake -d /dev/rtc0 -m mem*
However,
Launching alsaplayer, *wav *and *mp3 *files can be played, but no sound is
reproduced.
It seems as the BeagleBone's drivers are not pointing to right audio
interface.
*How can I checked if the SoC's audio codec and the HDMI's interface are
configured and working fine?*
By the moment, I can't
Hi,
I have built a custom image (kernel_version=4.1.20) in SD card from Robert
Nelson.
The current kernel version seems to be 4.5. How to upgrade from 4.1 to 4.5
without reflashing the SD card image.
The custom kernel upgrade should be downloaded from the local network and
not using apt-get.
Going forward in my test:
- Current kernel: *4.1.18-ti-r56*
- *aplay -L*:
null
Discard all samples (playback) or generate zero samples (capture)
default:CARD=Black
TI BeagleBone Black,
Default Audio Device
sysdefault:CARD=Black
TI BeagleBone Black,
Default Audio Device
-
I guess mmio would be sufficient enough for our application where we would
be able to access the gpio pins in mhz frequency as compared to khz
frequency through sys/class.
On Monday, April 4, 2016 at 5:49:01 PM UTC+5:30, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 03:40:22 -0700 (PDT),
*Any hint/tip?*
--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
31 matches
Mail list logo