> I think what I am leaning on doing is providing 5V directly to the VDD_5V
> connector with a diode fused battery+external power through a controllable
> regulator, and then using a tiny micro (most likely a PIC) to monitor power
> loss and then trigger an interrupt on a pin to cause the
just use the bbb battery connector.
it works fine
then use a small micro for the watchdog/power monitoring
my hardware does this and then after a power down cuts the battery
with proper timing the bbb can stay up for ever
On 5/3/2016 4:54 AM, Yiannis Papelis wrote:
> Fair enough.
>
> I think what
Fair enough.
I think what I am leaning on doing is providing 5V directly to the VDD_5V
connector with a diode fused battery+external power through a controllable
regulator, and then using a tiny micro (most likely a PIC) to monitor power
loss and then trigger an interrupt on a pin to cause the
>
> *Everyone keeps using the same sentence "you're asking for trouble" but
> without any more details on why that is the case. I get the file system
> corruption issue, just wanting to make sure there isn't anything else.*
>
I think Gerald already stated this, but I think it's worth repeating.
>
> *Very much agree with you - even though I don't want to use a battery, it
> seems more and more than a battery is a necessity for field use of the BBB,
> which would explain the existing connector.*
>
Having a battery still does not solve two other problems.
- Does not solve situations
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 6:19 PM, William Hermans wrote:
> Robert has had 1 or more Beagleboard's running a read only file system
> since . . . What Robert ? 2011 ? But you can search this group, and find
> him talking about them in a few different posts.
>
If you install an
Robert has had 1 or more Beagleboard's running a read only file system
since . . . What Robert ? 2011 ? But you can search this group, and find
him talking about them in a few different posts.
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Yiannis Papelis wrote:
> Mike,
>
> Thanks for the
>
> *As someone already posted, this is a bit more complicated than that, but
> I get the idea.*
>
I did not see anyone other than you, I, and Gerald post on your discussion
here. But I do not get every post to this group..
But, sure . . . it is not as simple as that because while the board is
Mike,
Thanks for the suggestion, this seems like a viable alternative.
On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 3:02:57 PM UTC-4, mjc wrote:
>
> On 05/02/2016 02:54 PM, Yiannis Papelis wrote:
> > Very much agree with you - even though I don't want to use a battery, it
> > seems more and more than a battery
On 05/02/2016 02:54 PM, Yiannis Papelis wrote:
Very much agree with you - even though I don't want to use a battery, it
seems more and more than a battery is a necessity for field use of the
BBB, which would explain the existing connector.
In my work, the solution was to use a read-only
As someone already posted, this is a bit more complicated than that, but I
get the idea.
On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 2:09:44 PM UTC-4, William Hermans wrote:
>
> *Use a super capacitor.*
>>
>
> Ok, a little abstract . . .
>
> Use a super capacitor, and if using a console image . . . sudo apt-get
William,
Thank you for following up - I appreciate the responses.
On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 1:47:45 PM UTC-4, William Hermans wrote:
>
> *I have been building embedded systems for a while now and I am
>> considering using the beaglebone (BBB) for an upcoming project, but I am
>> confused by
Very much agree with you - even though I don't want to use a battery, it
seems more and more than a battery is a necessity for field use of the BBB,
which would explain the existing connector.
On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 2:29:18 PM UTC-4, john3909 wrote:
>
> You cannot just use a supercap. You
Gerald,
Thanks for following up - do you mean that if I don't have anything writing
to the file system, I can simply yank the power?
I naturally have seen the expansion header usage you listed in your
response, is there something specific I should be looking at?
On Monday, May 2, 2016 at
You cannot just use a supercap. You have to use a boost switching regulator to
keep the voltage on the processor constant while the supercap discharges.
This is a lot more complicated than you suggest. You also have to deal with the
case of brown outs where the power is only off for fractions
>
> *Use a super capacitor.*
>
Ok, a little abstract . . .
Use a super capacitor, and if using a console image . . . sudo apt-get
install acpid
Then the board will automatically shutdown when 5V input goes missing. I'd
make sure you pick a super cap that can sustain the beaglebone for ~30
>
> *I have been building embedded systems for a while now and I am
> considering using the beaglebone (BBB) for an upcoming project, but I am
> confused by everything I read regarding the shutdown requirements. As an
> embedded system the only way to turn it off is to simply shutdown the power
>
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Yiannis Papelis wrote:
> I have been building embedded systems for a while now and I am considering
> using the beaglebone (BBB) for an upcoming project, but I am confused by
> everything I read regarding the shutdown requirements. As an
I have been building embedded systems for a while now and I am considering
using the beaglebone (BBB) for an upcoming project, but I am confused by
everything I read regarding the shutdown requirements. As an embedded
system the only way to turn it off is to simply shutdown the power with a
19 matches
Mail list logo