On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Martin G. McCormick
wrote:
> Brock Wilcox writes:
>> I'm afraid a bit more context is needed to identify the problem. Could you
>> post your entire bit of code into a gist or pastebin or something for us
>> to
>> see?
>
> I'll do better than that. This is a
On 02/27/2015 11:24 PM, Martin G. McCormick wrote:
Brock Wilcox writes:
I'm afraid a bit more context is needed to identify the problem. Could you
post your entire bit of code into a gist or pastebin or something for us
to
see?
I'll do better than that. This is a script which is
strippe
Brock Wilcox writes:
> I'm afraid a bit more context is needed to identify the problem. Could you
> post your entire bit of code into a gist or pastebin or something for us
> to
> see?
I'll do better than that. This is a script which is
stripped of everything but the problem code. It is 2
I'm afraid a bit more context is needed to identify the problem. Could you
post your entire bit of code into a gist or pastebin or something for us to
see?
On Feb 27, 2015 9:52 PM, "Martin G. McCormick" <
mar...@server1.shellworld.net> wrote:
> I put together an anonymous subroutine which
I put together an anonymous subroutine which partly
works. There is an array called @tasks which is defined as a
local variable in the main routine and when I call the anonymous
subroutine, one can still read all the elements in @tasks.
There is also a single scaler called $task, a
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 23:41:22 +0100
Alex Becker wrote:
> So my idea was to specify EUMM v6.46 as minimum in PREREQ_PM. This
> way, I would not have to do all this 'if the EUMM version is greater
> than X then add Y to Makefile.PL' stuff.
>
> So, would it work? Does it make sense?
I don't think so;
Hi!
When writing a Makefile.PL for a module (no, I don't want to read about
other ways to do it now), does it make sense to add ExtUtils::MakeMaker
(EUMM) to the PREREQ_PM module prerequisites list?
I'm asking because I saw some Makefile.PL where the installed version of
EUMM was checked and depe
