Re: perl editors

2004-01-31 Thread Robert
use vi all the time, does vim have this color ability? Derek B. Smith OhioHealth IT UNIX / TSM / EDM Teams 614-566-4145 "Wiggins d Anconia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/30/2004 10:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: pe

Re: perl editors

2004-01-30 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-30T12:55:38] > Thank you, but I was hoping to have a editor compatible with Redhat and or > HP and or AIX that gives you a color coded interface, such when there is a > syntax error it color codes it in red. If you have ever seen or used a VB > editor you know what

Re: Re: perl editors

2004-01-30 Thread LoneWolf
Nedit http://nedit.org/ Macros can be found here if they are not already there (nedit comes with a LOT of them already) http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=nedit HTH Robert >On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:32:02 -0700 Wiggins d Anconia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote. >> >> Is

Re: perl editors

2004-01-30 Thread Wiggins d Anconia
on is asked *a lot* on this forum you should check the archives. There was also some discussion of it on the Chicago PM list recently. http://danconia.org > > > "Wiggins d Anconia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 01/30/2004 10:32 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: perl editors

2004-01-30 Thread DBSMITH
vim have this color ability? Derek B. Smith OhioHealth IT UNIX / TSM / EDM Teams 614-566-4145 "Wiggins d Anconia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/30/2004 10:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: perl editors > >

Re: perl editors

2004-01-30 Thread Wiggins d Anconia
> > Is there a visual perl editor out there, freeware or shareware for any > Linux flavor? > perldoc -q 'IDE or Windows Perl Editor' Since I use Vim the closest for me would be gvim. http://danconia.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

perl editors

2004-01-30 Thread DBSMITH
Is there a visual perl editor out there, freeware or shareware for any Linux flavor? Derek B. Smith OhioHealth IT UNIX / TSM / EDM Teams

RE: Perl editors

2003-01-02 Thread Paul Kraus
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Perl editors > > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 10:33:46AM -0500, Paul Kraus wrote: > > I am running emacs for windows. How do I use these > debugging options? > > I currently use cperl mode. > > > > I haven't look

Re: Perl editors

2003-01-01 Thread Kieren Diment
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 10:33:46AM -0500, Paul Kraus wrote: > I am running emacs for windows. How do I use these debugging options? I > currently use cperl mode. > I haven't looked at it too hard, but, under xemacs using linux I get a reasonable debugging environment via the Debugger option on t

RE: Perl editors

2002-12-31 Thread Paul Kraus
I am running emacs for windows. How do I use these debugging options? I currently use cperl mode. > -Original Message- > From: Kieren Diment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 1:44 AM > To: Gavin Laking > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject

Re: Perl editors

2002-12-31 Thread Kieren Diment
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 10:46:36AM +, Gavin Laking wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm currently using a mixture of Quanta[1], jEdit[2] and Kate[3] (all Linux) > for my Perl editing needs, but I'm wondering if there are any specialised > editors(preferably free) which others are using. > > In my ideal

Re: Perl editors

2002-12-29 Thread R. Joseph Newton
Hi Gavin, We had quite an extensive discussion, and a very good-humored one, recently. It is still on the archives: http://archive.develooper.com/beginners%40perl.org/ with the originating post: # Editors, Paul Kraus <2002-12-17> Unfortunately, I didn't see any input on IDE-style editors. A

Perl editors

2002-12-29 Thread Gavin Laking
Hi folks, I'm currently using a mixture of Quanta[1], jEdit[2] and Kate[3] (all Linux) for my Perl editing needs, but I'm wondering if there are any specialised editors(preferably free) which others are using. In my ideal world I'd like an editor that is not console/terminal based, (I prefer GTK,

Re: Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor

2002-08-21 Thread Ramprasad A Padmanabhan
age- >>From: Paul Tremblay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:24 PM >>To: begin begin >>Subject: Re: Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor >> >> >>I'm surprised that more posters didn't advocate vim as *the*

Re: ?Perl Editors - Re: Editor

2002-07-31 Thread Jenda Krynicky
> > I read one comment about Crimson Editor - it can fit on a floppy I > > can remember when that was a given - fit on a floppy. SciTE can too (unpacked!) : http://www.scintilla.org/SciTE.html Though if you wanted macros you'd have to install FilerX : http://llt.chez.tiscali.fr/ which is another

Re: ?Perl Editors - Re: Editor

2002-07-31 Thread drieux
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 09:22 , perl wrote: [..] > Was that to scare us newcomers to Perl I can't speak for anyone else, but 'scare' is too strong a word for my intentions - unless by that we mean oblige folks to remember that 'coding' is about 'putting the stuff between the curley brace

Fw: ?Perl Editors - Re: Editor

2002-07-31 Thread Krackedpress \(Default\)
rent equipment, > why take the time. For me time is money. Spend you time > where it counts. Not to keep up with the "Jones". > > Timothy Lungstrom > owner of Kracked Press Production > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ** > >

RE: Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor

2002-07-31 Thread Nikola Janceski
see inline comments > -Original Message- > From: Paul Tremblay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:24 PM > To: begin begin > Subject: Re: Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor > > > I'm surprised that more posters didn&#

Re: Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor

2002-07-31 Thread Paul Tremblay
I'm surprised that more posters didn't advocate vim as *the* editor. I think it is linux world that did a survey and found that 80 percent of the users picked vim as their favorite editor. I originally started using vim, then switched to nedit, and now have switched back to vim. Nedit if very ni

Re: Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor

2002-07-31 Thread drieux
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 08:04 , Nikola Janceski wrote: > Yep even the best of syntax highlighting patterns still can't handle some > of > those FUNKY regexs I use in my perl program. don't EVEN get me started... { "too late drieux" } hum. parenting code, is like parentin

RE: Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor

2002-07-31 Thread Nikola Janceski
Yep even the best of syntax highlighting patterns still can't handle some of those FUNKY regexs I use in my perl program. > -Original Message- > From: drieux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 10:46 AM > To: begin begin > Subject: Perl IDE&#

Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor

2002-07-31 Thread drieux
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 06:43 , Scott Barnett wrote: [..] > What is a good Perl Editor for writing scripts? The Correct Answer is: The one on the machine where you do your editing. That simplifies the process for you. I am partial to doing my development with bbedit 6.

Win32 Perl editors (was: Perl 6?)

2002-04-03 Thread David Gray
For all you win32 perl hackers, I've been using a really cool editor called Code-Genie: for about a month now, which allows customizable nested syntax highlighting! I definitely recommend it, and I'll post my syntax customization file if anyone's interested. Cheers, -da