Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR, implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility

I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 3:45 AM To: bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobil...@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WGLC, IPR, implementation

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-secure-evpn-06

I'm not aware of any of any undisclosed IPR. Yours Irrespectively, John From: Matthew Bocci (Nokia) Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 6:35 AM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-sajassi-bess-secure-e...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WG Adoption and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-secure-evpn-06

Re: [bess] A doubt about draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ip-aliasing-05

I agree with Jorge. A draft can’t possibly enumerate all of the things it doesn’t support. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 24, 2022, at 4:08 AM, Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) wrote:  [External Email. Be cautious of content] Hi Sasha, The document explicitly mentions single-active and all-active.

Re: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-05

Support and I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: BESS On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 7:06 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ac-aware-bundling

Support and I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: BESS On Behalf Of Stephane Litkowski (slitkows) Sent: Monday, October 10, 2022 4:39 AM To: bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for

Re: [bess] Fwd: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi, Snipped, comments inline below, Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: Murray S. Kucherawy Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2022 1:17 PM To: John E Drake Cc: BESS ; bess-cha...@ietf.org; Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) ; Ali Sajassi (sajassi) (saja...@cisco.com) Subject: Re

Re: [bess] Fwd: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi, Comments inline below. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: BESS On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy Sent: Friday, March 11, 2022 11:41 PM To: BESS ; bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [bess] Fwd: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-14: (with

Re: [bess] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

That sems like a good idea. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: Luc André Burdet Sent: Saturday, March 5, 2022 10:06 AM To: Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) ; Eric Vyncke (evyncke) ; John E Drake ; The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-pr...@ietf.org; bess-cha

Re: [bess] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi, Comments inline below. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only > -Original Message- > From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) > Sent: Friday, March 4, 2022 10:30 AM > To: John E Drake ; The IESG > > Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-pr...@ietf.org; slitk

Re: [bess] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi, Snipped, comments inline Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only > -Original Message- > DISCUSS: > -- > > As Martin Vigoureux's term is near its end, I took the liberty to re-evaluate > the >

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

ankamis) Sent: Friday, February 11, 2022 11:02 AM To: John E Drake ; Benjamin Kaduk Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-pr...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org; slitkows.i...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-13:

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Ben, Comments inline below. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only > -Original Message- > From: Benjamin Kaduk > Sent: Friday, February 4, 2022 8:09 PM > To: John E Drake > Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-pr...@ietf.org; > bess-cha

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery-03

Support and not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 8:58 AM To: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recov...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WGLC, IPR and Implementation Poll

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only > -Original Message- > From: Benjamin Kaduk > Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 10:08 PM > To: John E Drake > Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-pr...@ietf.org; > bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ie

Re: [bess] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Stephane, Would you please answer Murray's DISCUSS, below, regarding IPR for this draft? Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only > -Original Message- > From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2021 2:34 AM > To: The IESG > Cc:

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Ben, Thanks for your reply. Mankamana said that he will make the changes you suggested and re-publish the draft today. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only > -Original Message- > From: Benjamin Kaduk > Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 10:08 PM > To:

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Ben, Comments inline. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only > -Original Message- > From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker > Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 8:49 PM > To: The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-pr...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org; >

Re: [bess] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi, Ben is correct in his email, below: The IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN draft (draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-13) is going to create the Multicast Flags Extended Community Registry. The complete list of assignments to be is: 7 SBD (draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast) 8 Segment

Re: [bess] Doubts about Section 9.6 of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy

9.6. Rewriting of EVI RT and EVI-RT Extended Communities by ASBRs There are certain situations in which an ES is attached to a set of PEs that are not all in the same AS, or not all operated by the same

Re: [bess] A question regarding DF election for Virtual Ethernet Segments

, October 19, 2021 9:36 AM To: John E Drake Cc: bess@ietf.org; Luc André Burdet ; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment@ietf.org Subject: RE: A question regarding DF election for Virtual Ethernet Segments Importance: High [External Email. Be cautious of content] John, Lots of thanks for a prompt

Re: [bess] A question regarding DF election for Virtual Ethernet Segments

Sasha, Thanks for catching this, as it is a remnant. Please see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8584#section-1.1, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-01#section-3, and https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-01#section-8.5.

Re: [bess] CORRECTION WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for *draft-ietf-bess-evpn-geneve-03*

Support Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 5:00 AM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-gen...@ietf.org Subject: CORRECTION WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for

Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc

I'm not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: BESS On Behalf Of slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 2:02 AM To: 'BESS' Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for

Re: [bess] Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05

Hi, I agree with Ali. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: BESS On Behalf Of Ali Sajassi (sajassi) Sent: Friday, August 27, 2021 9:54 PM To: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) ; bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Implementation poll for

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-12: (with COMMENT)

Ben, Thanks for your thorough review and discussion. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only > -Original Message- > From: BESS On Behalf Of Benjamin Kaduk via > Datatracker > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 1:22 PM > To: The IESG > Cc:

Re: [bess] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi, Comments inline. We are planning to publish a new version of the draft with our proposed changes, on which John Scudder has graciously worked with us, once the black-out has been lifted. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only > -Original Message- > From: John

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's DISCUSS ballot comment on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-09

Ben, Thanks for your help. I think Ali will add the text from Amanda in the next published version of the draft. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only > -Original Message- > From: Benjamin Kaduk > Sent: Wednesday, June 9, 2021 1:28 PM > To: John E Drak

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Thanks! Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only > -Original Message- > From: Benjamin Kaduk > Sent: Wednesday, June 9, 2021 1:26 PM > To: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) > Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet- > forward...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org;

Re: [bess] WG POLL: Moving forward draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery by dropping "Handshake" option

Hi, Please use time synchronization only - it's a much simpler and more robust solution. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: BESS On Behalf Of slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 5:19 AM To: 'BESS' Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG POLL:

Re: [bess] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10

Excellent, thanks so much for your help on this. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only > -Original Message- > From: Gyan Mishra > Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 4:28 PM > To: Lars Eggert > Cc: General Area Review Team ; bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf- >

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi, I think that we want to keep the text as-is. I.e., withdraw the route and then send an ARP probe, because in the normal case the ARP probe will fail and we have cleaned up expeditiously. A positive response to the ARP probe is highly unlikely, but if it happens then we need to

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's DISCUSS ballot comment on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-09

Hi, I corresponded with Amanda Baber and she says we can add a note to the IANA Considerations section of the IRB draft stating that "This document has been listed as an additional reference for the MAC/IP Advertisement route in the EVPN Route Type registry". Yours Irrespectively, John

Re: [bess] New short WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb

Bruno, I'm sorry, I was just proposing 1 GBS for purposes of discussion. I think 1 Mbit/s would be fine. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 11:58 AM To: John E Drake Cc: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; bess@ietf.org

Re: [bess] New short WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb

not seem to work with links below 1GBPS. (I personally don't see an issue with the encoding currently chosen in the draft but if authors/WG want to change, this also works for me) Regards, --Bruno From: John E Drake [mailto:jdr...@juniper.net] Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 4:23 PM To: DECRAENE Bruno

Re: [bess] New short WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb

...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 10:06 AM To: John E Drake Cc: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; bess@ietf.org; Neeraj Malhotra Subject: RE: [bess] New short WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb [External Email. Be cautious of content] John, > It's *not* all egress PEs, it's only the mu

Re: [bess] New short WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb

, John Juniper Business Use Only From: bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 9:16 AM To: John E Drake Cc: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; bess@ietf.org; Neeraj Malhotra Subject: RE: [bess] New short WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb [External Email. Be cautious of content] Hi

Re: [bess] New short WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb

Bruno, I had suggested: "The value field in the link bandwidth EC is to be treated as a 6 octet unsigned integer and it is the provider's responsibility to encode it consistently across all of the PEs attached to a given ES. So, for example, if the provider wanted the EC to represent

Re: [bess] VXLAN BGP EVPN Question

23, 2021 6:21 PM To: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) ; BESS ; Jeff Tantsura ; John E Drake ; Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) Subject: Fwd: [bess] VXLAN BGP EVPN Question [External Email. Be cautious of content] Authors Do we know if this draft will progress to RFC? https://tools.ietf.org

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

Support, and I'm not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: BESS On Behalf Of slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 2:06 PM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for

Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01

Support and I'm not aware of any IPR. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: BESS On Behalf Of slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 3:58 AM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for

Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc-02

Support, not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 6:13 AM To: bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-...@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-weighted-hrw-01

Support and I'm not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 4:23 AM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-mohanty-bess-weighted-...@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-weighted-hrw-01 [External Email.

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Ben, Perhaps, although AFAIK the three values defined in RFC 4364 have not been supplemented since it was published in 2006. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only > -Original Message- > From: Benjamin Kaduk > Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2020 9:49 AM > To:

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Ben, An RD is encoded using the same format as an extended community but it isn't an extended community. Rather, it is actually part of the NLRI. The first octet is always zero whereas the first octet of an SFIR Pool Identifier extended community will always be non-zero (TBD6). Yours

Re: [bess] IPSec Tunnels and draft-sajassi-bess-secure-evpn

Hi, I also agree with Ali. Eric specifically included the Tunnel Encapsulation Extended Community in his draft at our request in order to support RFC 8365. I.e., the draft that became RFC 8365 initially used the Tunnel Encapsulation Extended Community defined in RFC 5512 and pre-dated by

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-geneve-01

Support and not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 7:46 AM To: bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-gen...@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org; 'idr@ietf. org' Subject: WGLC, IPR and implementation

Re: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-02

Support, and not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 6:56 AM To: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-fr...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: WG Last Call and IPR Poll for

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07

Support, and I'm not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: BESS On Behalf Of slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 8:14 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07 [External

Re: [bess] new WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-05

Much better Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: BESS On Behalf Of Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 4:09 PM To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; bess@ietf.org Cc: Prabhu, Vinod (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) ; bess-cha...@ietf.org; Dornon, Olivier

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast-04

Support and not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: BESS On Behalf Of slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 9:25 AM To: 'BESS' Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for

Re: [bess] REMINDER Re: WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-04

Support and not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 6:29 AM To: draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gate...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: REMINDER Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

Support, not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 3:56 AM To: bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for

Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5899)

om> | phone: +1 613 254 4814 On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:30 AM John E Drake mailto:40juniper@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: I agree Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 12, 2019, at 3:10 PM, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) > mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com>> wrote: > >

Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5900)

This should be rejected as well. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 12, 2019, at 5:32 PM, RFC Errata System > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8584, > "Framework for Ethernet VPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility". > >

Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5899)

I agree Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 12, 2019, at 3:10 PM, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) > wrote: > > Hi, > > I don't understand why this erratum was filed. > "Broadcast Domain" is the correct term used in RFC7432 and all the EVPN > documents. > It should be rejected. > >

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-keyupate-bess-evpn-virtual-hub-02

Support, I'm not aware of any IPR. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2019 4:36 AM To: draft-keyupate-bess-evpn-virtual-...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption and IPR poll for

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy

Support. I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Internal From: BESS On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 4:53 AM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for

Re: [bess] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane-06

Hi, We can't time-out an attribute, we would have to time-out the SFPR w/ which it is associated. However, I don't think we should do that. Rather, I think what we should do is indicate that at any point in time an SFF selects its next hop from the intersection of the set of next hop RDs

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-boutros-bess-evpn-geneve

I'm not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Internal From: BESS On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 9:55 AM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-boutros-bess-evpn-geneve Hi,

Re: [bess] About draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-02

Hi, I agree w/ both Jorge and Krzysztof. All we need is a new DF Election capability, port active load balancing, and a description of how each of the defined DF elections is modified. For HRW, RFC 8584 already describes computing a 32 bit CRC over the concatenation of Ethernet Tag and ESI

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-04

Not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John From: mitesh kanjariya Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 4:49 PM To: bess@ietf.org; draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobil...@ietf.org; stephane.litkow...@orange.com Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption and IPR poll for

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-04

Support Yours Irrespectively, John From: mitesh kanjariya Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 4:49 PM To: bess@ietf.org; draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobil...@ietf.org; stephane.litkow...@orange.com Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption and IPR poll for

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-04

Support, not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 3:43 AM To: bess@ietf.org; draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobil...@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption and IPR poll for

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-02

Support. I'm not aware of any IPR. Yours Irrespectively, John From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 10:53 AM To: draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interwork...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption and IPR poll for

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-salam-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-01

Support, not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 5:23 AM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-salam-bess-evpn-oam-req-fr...@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-salam-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-01 This email

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane

Andy, We’ll add it to the next revision. Thanks for your help. Yours Irrespectively, John From: Andrew G. Malis Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2019 11:48 AM To: John E Drake Cc: Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) ; stephane.litkow...@orange.com; bess@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane

Andy, That sounds right. Yours Irrespectively, John From: Andrew G. Malis Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 6:32 PM To: John E Drake Cc: Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) ; stephane.litkow...@orange.com; bess@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane

Wim, The subject draft was designed w/ NSH in mind. We added an MPLS representation of the NSH later, which is the subject of the first draft you referenced, below. The way the subject draft is written, the representation of the NSH and the type of transport tunnel can change on a hop-by-hop

Re: [bess] Last Call: (Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility) to Proposed Standard

Comment inline Sent from my iPhone On Dec 18, 2018, at 12:33 PM, Neeraj Malhotra mailto:neeraj.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, Very solid and understandable. Couple of minor comments [NM]: Section 2.1: Layer-2 devices are particularly susceptible to forwarding loops because of the broadcast

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment

Support, Juniper has supported this feature for an eternity, not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Monday, December 3, 2018 5:43 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WGLC, IPR and

Re: [bess] About draft-brissette-bess-evpn-l2gw-proto-03

Patrice, I think it is much cleaner to treat the attachment of a set of L2GW PEs to an L2 network as a set of individual ESes, one per L2GW PE, as Jorge suggests. This is because a remote PE accesses different parts of the L2 network through different L2GW PEs; i.e., to a remote PE the

Re: [bess] About draft-brissette-bess-evpn-l2gw-proto-03

Hi, I agree w/ Jorge's proposal. Yours Irrespectively, John > -Original Message- > From: BESS On Behalf Of Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - > US/Mountain View) > Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 4:45 AM > To: bess@ietf.org; draft-brissette-bess-evpn-l2gw-proto.auth...@ietf.org > Subject: [bess]

Re: [bess] A question regarding draft-wang-bess-evepn-control-word

Hi, Comment inline Yours Irrespectively, John From: BESS On Behalf Of Alexander Vainshtein Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 11:57 AM To: Yutianpeng (Tim) Cc: bess@ietf.org; draft-wang-bess-evpn-control-word.auth...@ietf.org; Wanghaibo (Rainsword) Subject: Re: [bess] A question regarding

Re: [bess] EVPN MH: Backup node behavior in Primary Path Failure

Jorge, The other possibility for this case is for each PE to advertise a Per EVI Ethernet A-D route for only those EVIs for which it would become DF if the current DF were to fail. Yours Irrespectively, John From: BESS On Behalf Of Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [bess] Encoding a 20 bit label in a 24 bit field.

I don't think that's a good idea because depending upon their position in the stack, these labels may not be at the bottom of the stack. Yours Irrespectively, John > -Original Message- > From: BESS On Behalf Of Zhuangshunwan > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 9:02 PM > To: Jakob Heitz

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Support, not aware of any IPR. Yours Irrespectively, John From: BESS On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 3:29 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 Hi WG, This email begins a two-week poll for

Re: [bess] new WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-05

Support. I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Yours Irrespectively, John From: BESS On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 10:04 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] new WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-05 Hello working group,

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-per-mcast-flow-df-election

Support. I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Yours Irrespectively, John From: BESS On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 9:38 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-per-mcast-flow-df-election Hi

[bess] Issue w/ IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN (draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy)

-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy]. Yours Irrespectively, John -Original Message- From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 11:09 AM To: John E Drake Subject: RE: IGMP Proxy Hi John, Thanks for the information. It helps. However, that would have been better to have

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment-03

Support, I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR Yours Irrespectively, John From: BESS On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 6:24 AM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segm...@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc-03.txt

I’m not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John From: BESS On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: Monday, April 9, 2018 9:23 AM To: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-vpws-...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for

Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on problem description

. Yours Irrespectively, John From: Wen Lin Sent: Friday, April 6, 2018 9:26 AM To: Sandy Breeze <sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>; Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <saja...@cisco.com>; UTTARO, JAMES <ju1...@att.com>; John E Drake <jdr...@juniper.net>; Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mou

Re: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-01.txt

Support. Juniper has been shipping an implementation of this draft for quite some time and our customers seem to find the draft to be quite useful. Yours Irrespectively, John From: BESS On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 8:50 AM

Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework

Support, not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Yours Irrespectively, John From: BESS On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 10:21 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group,

Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on problem description

Satya, Comment inline. Yours Irrespectively, John [John] Wouldn’t it be better to have this draft define a bit in the Multicast Flags extended community

Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on problem description

Ali, I don't mean to quibble but your option A also requires all PEs to be upgraded. However, it's both a more mainstream upgrade and a better solution than the Sandy/Satya proposal. Also, as we discussed last week, the SMET processing already includes what Sandy/Satya proposal wants to do.

Re: [bess] About draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy

Mankamana, Good catch! (I was remarkably provincial in my initial titles.) Yours Irrespectively, John From: Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 4:27 PM To: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) Cc: Ali Sajassi (sajassi)

Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on problem description

Hi, Comments inline Yours Irrespectively, John From: Sandy Breeze <sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 1:42 PM To: John E Drake <jdr...@juniper.net>; Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) <jorge.raba...@nokia.com>; Eric Rosen <ero...@junipe

Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df

Hi, The HRW DF election draft defines a new extended community, the DF Election Extended Community (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-03#section-7), which contains a DF election type registry. Why don’t we define a value for AC-based DF election and have the PEs

Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-lin-bess-evpn-irb-mcast

Support Yours Irrespectively, John > -Original Message- > From: Martin Vigoureux [mailto:martin.vigour...@nokia.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 5:12 AM > To: bess@ietf.org > Cc: draft-lin-bess-evpn-irb-mc...@ietf.org > Subject: Call for adoption: draft-lin-bess-evpn-irb-mcast >

Re: [bess] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-10 PMSI with Ingress Replication

erstand. > > > > OK, I will remove it in the next rev. > > > > Cheers, > > Ali > > > > Best, > > > > -Thomas > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: John E Drake [mailto:jdr...@jun

Re: [bess] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-10 PMSI with Ingress Replication

Thomas, I completely agree w/ your email, below. Yours Irrespectively, John > -Original Message- > From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin > Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 5:42 AM > To: Fedyk, Don ; Marco Marzetti > >

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-08

Alvaro, Comments inline. Yours Irrespectively, John From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 4:49 PM To: bess-cha...@ietf.org Cc: EXT - thomas.mo...@orange.com ; bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] AD Review of

Re: [bess] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-07

Support. A truly useful document that has already been used by a multiplicity of other drafts. Yours Irrespectively, John > -Original Message- > From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John Scudder > Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 2:39 PM > To: i...@ietf.org > Cc:

Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-drake-bess-datacenter-gateway

Martin, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Yours Irrespectively, John > -Original Message- > From: Martin Vigoureux [mailto:martin.vigour...@nokia.com] > Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 5:43 AM > To: bess@ietf.org > Cc: draft-drake-bess-datacenter-gate...@ietf.org

Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane

Support and I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Yours Irrespectively, John > -Original Message- > From: Martin Vigoureux [mailto:martin.vigour...@nokia.com] > Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 6:55 AM > To: bess@ietf.org > Cc: draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-pl...@ietf.org > Subject: Call

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Sami, Snipped, comment inline Yours Irrespectively, John > > > >> Ethernet Tag ID 32-bit field MUST be set to the 24-bit VPWS service > >> instance > identifier value." > > > > > > > >Ok, but you still didn’t mention how the 24-bit value is to be aligned in > >the 32- > bit field. I’m

Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-04

Support and I'm not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John > -Original Message- > From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 5:08 PM > To: BESS > Subject: [bess] WG Last Call for

Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-04

And I'm not aware of any IPR Yours Irrespectively, John > -Original Message- > From: John E Drake > Sent: Monday, February 6, 2017 4:45 PM > To: 'Martin Vigoureux' <martin.vigour...@nokia.com>; BESS <bess@ietf.org> > Subject: RE: [bess] WG Last Call for draft

Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-04

Support. Juniper has had support for this draft for several years and has demonstrated interoperability with Nokia and Cisco on numerous occasions Yours Irrespectively, John > -Original Message- > From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux > Sent:

  1   2   >