[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Trying to run 6.5 - won't seem to start... suggestions?

2006-01-20 Thread EnochLight
Yikes - that's a bit past my understanding. ;-) Thanks anyway; looks like I'll stick with 6.2.2 instead... -- EnochLight EnochLight's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3392 View this thread: http:/

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Changing sort order of Browse Artwork

2006-01-20 Thread Dan Sully
* JJZolx shaped the electrons to say... Why is that? If it's an implementation issue then it's really not a question for end users. It is an implementation issue - but it has an impact on end users. The alpha bar is more useful than the numeric bar. It could be better, though. I think the

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Trying to run 6.5 - won't seem to start... suggestions?

2006-01-20 Thread gharris999
You might try installing the full svn version. I'm running 6.5 that way and, aside from expected beta hiccups, it's working really well with my all-flac library. The only area that seems unfunctional right now is playlists. You can check the wiki for instructions on installing the whole svn, bu

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Changing sort order of Browse Artwork

2006-01-20 Thread JJZolx
Dan Sully Wrote: > Personally, I despise the "alpha page bar", and would love to get rid of > it. Why is that? If it's an implementation issue then it's really not a question for end users. > I'm sure Dean doesn't agree. However, I'd like to start a discussion on > alternatives. Obviously the n

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Changing sort order of Browse Artwork

2006-01-20 Thread MrC
Dan Sully Wrote: > Personally, I despise the "alpha page bar", and would love to get rid of > it. > I'm sure Dean doesn't agree. However, I'd like to start a discussion > on > alternatives. Obviously the numeric pagebar is available, but not > extremely > useful. Other thoughts? It certainly seem

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Changing sort order of Browse Artwork

2006-01-20 Thread Dan Sully
* MrC shaped the electrons to say... At 5743, with artist,year,album, I still have: 1 2 3 V C 3 C 4 V 8 V A V A N A O V A V A V A O A V A V A V A V R O A V A B V B V B P B S B V B V O B V S W B V B C B T B V B V B O B V B V B O V K B T V O V B L B V J B V B H B E B O B R B M T C V C V C O C O C

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Changing sort order of Browse Artwork

2006-01-20 Thread MrC
At 5743, with artist,year,album, I still have: 1 2 3 V C 3 C 4 V 8 V A V A N A O V A V A V A O A V A V A V A V R O A V A B V B V B P B S B V B V O B V S W B V B C B T B V B V B O B V B V B O V K B T V O V B L B V J B V B H B E B O B R B M T C V C V C O C O C V C V C T C B C V C V C P C F C D O V

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: IR Blaster tests

2006-01-20 Thread Duman
The volume codes work and I am able to select my receiver's SB3 input using one of the number codes. Thanks so much for the help. Discrete power on and power off codes would be nice but it doesn't look like Panasonic provides them. A few minor issues: If I associate a sequence of codes with a

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Changing sort order of Browse Artwork

2006-01-20 Thread cbemoore
My server settings are "Group compilation albums together" and "List albums by band". If I change my server settings to display artwork in album order, then "Browse Artwork" correctly displays the album under "R" (Romeo Must Die"), but the caption still incorrectly reads "Romeo Must Die by Stanl

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Changing sort order of Browse Artwork

2006-01-20 Thread Triode
OK that confirms my quess.. I need to look at the datamodel more to understand what is possible in terms of sorting. At present I agree it sorts by track. What do you have the Server Settings - Behaviour - Compilation options set to? -- Triode

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Changing sort order of Browse Artwork

2006-01-20 Thread cbemoore
>From what I can tell, the Various Artists handling doesn't work correctly. If an album has no "album artist", but each track has a different "track artist", then the album is sorted as follows: - The list sorting uses the first track's artist. - The index and album caption use the last track's

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Changing sort order of Browse Artwork

2006-01-20 Thread Triode
Hum.. If you look at the actual artwork order, are there albums with a legitimate artist name in the wrong place which cause this. If so, do these have multiple contributors (artists etc?) -- Triode Triode's Profile: htt

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Changing sort order of Browse Artwork

2006-01-20 Thread cbemoore
Using svn5733, and sorting by artist-year-album, I get the following: 833 albums with 11449 songs by 1101 artists. 2 3 F 4 8 S A S A M A G A S A B T B F T E B Q B D B N B C V B S B D B T B C D C T C D C D H D L D O E D O D E S F S F E F G H I J M J K L D L D L M E M D M N Q M N 1 N S N O P T P C

[SlimDevices: Beta] Trying to run 6.5 - won't seem to start... suggestions?

2006-01-20 Thread EnochLight
I've done a clean reformat of my system (just went dual-core - WAHOO!) and instead of installing 6.2 I decided to try the 6.5 beta and lend a hand in testing. However, it installs and starts minimized on my task bar but never begins searching my library or appears to give me access. 6.2 took all

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: Changing sort order of Browse Artwork

2006-01-20 Thread Triode
Could anyone try svn r5733 and post what the pagebar looks like now.. -- Triode Triode's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=20199 _

[SlimDevices: Beta] Lynksys Problems - Nightly 19th Jan

2006-01-20 Thread Keith
Not sure if this is coincidence but havig loaded 6.5b1 nightly (19th Jan) both the gateway (AG241) and the wireless access units (WAP54G) failed. With the 54G it was the LAN that failed so coul have been down to the gateway. I even moved ports but had the same problem. I rebooted both units and th

[SlimDevices: Beta] Re: New file syck.dll (added in svn 5711) breaks ActiveState Perl on Windows XP

2006-01-20 Thread cbemoore
Dan Sully Wrote: > And you're synced to the latest 5715? Hi Dan, Minor correction - I was actually synced to svn 5717 (not 5515) when the error occurred. I see you've reverted the YAML::Syck changes in svn 5722. I've just upgraded to the latest (svn 5728) and everything is working happily agai