haunyack;268754 Wrote:
It settles in about 10 minutes, after a clean scan or rescan.
After that it loads normally on restart or reboot if nothing new added
to db.
Trouble is, I usually have something to add on every boot, so the next
start, I am finding something to do while the server
Hi Mike.
Whaddya think?
U talking 2 me?
I think the OP and you are seeing different issues here. You might have run
into bug 7104 (which is partially caused by the workaround for bug 4699): we're
pre-caching album art for faster display on Controller web interface. This
procedure seems to
I've got the latest SC (SqueezeCenter Version: 7.0.1 - 17491 - Debian -
EN - utf8) and in Firefox the scroll-wheel no longer scrolls the
Advanced Settings drop-down list and there is no scroll-bar on the rhs
of the browser window. The only way to scroll the list now seems to be
arrow keys.
I've got the latest SC (SqueezeCenter Version: 7.0.1 - 17491 - Debian -
EN - utf8) and in Firefox the scroll-wheel no longer scrolls the
Advanced Settings drop-down list and there is no scroll-bar on the rhs
of the browser window. The only way to scroll the list now seems to be
arrow keys.
--
OK, thanks.
--
smc2911
smc2911's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4388
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=42476
___
beta
I have exactly the same issues (to the letter) with my new
(pre-production) Receiver as described above, but haven't spent enough
time narrowing down the cause yet to properly contribute. I managed to
get it to connect for a whole 10 minutes last night after a similar
amount of time trying as
Strange that you can see the SBR but not SC.
Are you sure the SBR is properly configured?
What happens if you unplug the SBR and then boot the SBC?
-s.
--
slimpy
slimpy's Profile:
smc2911;268767 Wrote:
On occasion when I couldn't connect to my SC using the SBC, I chose
other server (something like that) and entered the IP address and
that worked.
I tried that, using the IP of the SC7 PC (192.168.0.5) and it actually
finds the network name of the SC7 computer (fathom),
Might be interesting to look at any logs on your access point/router to
see what's happening at that end of the network connection...
--
Balthazar_B
Balthazar_B's Profile:
I reported this as a bug, and got a response that it was working as
designed. Here is the situation:
I have SC 7 loaded on my laptop, and I use it to play stuff through
Winamp because SC gives me better control of Last.FM, XM Radio, MusicIP
mixes, etc. when I travel.
If Winamp is the only
Balthazar_B;268864 Wrote:
Might be interesting to look at any logs on your access point/router to
see what's happening at that end of the network connection...
Good suggestion, but instead of looking at wireless logs, I plugged the
SBR in via ethernet and VIOLA! Everything works!
So the
Anyway, if this is the behavior, would it be possible to set it to
locked and high?
It's just the graphics on the web interface: as the volume on Winamp can't be
manipulated it's set to display _some_ value, which happens to be the minimum.
It could display some photo instead - it wouldn't
bulletmark;268317 Wrote:
If you have subversion installed on your debian system (apt-get install
subversion if not) then just type the following command to see the log
output:
Code:
% svn log -r17127:17388 http://svn.slimdevices.com/repos/slim/
7.0 has been in testing, not unstable state for a week or so now.
Unstable is the new 7.0.1. Other software projects would call 7.0 a
release candidate rather than a beta at this point.
And in regards to why do we have to wait so long - well, there are
pretty massive changes. Everything in
Hi there
Sorry to hear all the trouble.
Can you give me some information on how you have tried to connect your
SBC and SBR when it failed to find your SC.
My guess is that you used wireless for both. What are the parameters,
i.e. SSID and encryption you are using?
I also guess that you are
Thanks Mark, that's a great summary of our situation.
We're down to the last couple of blocker bugs for 7.0.
If you are still having problems with SqueezeCenter, Squeezebox, Duet
or SqueezeNetwork, PLEASE file those bugs now.
On Feb 13, 2008, at 7:56 AM, Mark Lanctot wrote:
Given that the
fcm4711;268922 Wrote:
Hi there
Sorry to hear all the trouble.
Can you give me some information on how you have tried to connect your
SBC and SBR when it failed to find your SC.
My guess is that you used wireless for both. What are the parameters,
i.e. SSID and encryption you are
gharris999;268601 Wrote:
OK, answered my one question. Yes, I should have done a yum erase
squeezecenter-testing-release to get rid of the old repo.
Correct, but right now you probably don't want to update to the newer
squeezecenter-repo either. See bug 6974 comment 10.
--
Fletch
Fletch;268961 Wrote:
Correct, but right now you probably don't want to update to the newer
squeezecenter-repo either. See bug 6974 comment 10.
So...for now, I guess what one needs to do is edit
/etc/yum.repos.d/squeezecenter.repo and change gpgcheck=1 to gpgcheck=0
for all the repositories
Siduhe;268858 Wrote:
Is there any other way to set the SBR back to default settings than
Factory Reset? When I factory reset, it still seems to remember all my
network settings. Leaving the battery out for 30 mins does the trick,
but it means I'm a bit time limited for debugging.
It gets
Pale Blue Ego;268863 Wrote:
I tried that, using the IP of the SC7 PC (192.168.0.5) and it actually
finds the network name of the SC7 computer (fathom), but it won't
connect to it. It lists both 192.168.0.5 and fathom in the list of
networks (along with SqueezeNetwork), but it won't let me
Michael Herger;268776 Wrote:
Squeezecenter essentially freezes up while loading.
What system are you running SC on? What version of SC are you updating
from? What's your library size? Browser?
--
Michael
Windblows XP Pro
SqueezeCenter 7.0 - 17424 - Windows XP - EN - cp1252
thx guys for the info. btw, i specifically did not ask this:
why do we have to wait so long
b/c i knew the answer... i just wanted to get an idea of how much
longer, as opposed to why.
i actually looked over the entire bug list, open and closed, the past
few days, and voted for a bunch, and
Michael Herger;268787 Wrote:
U talking 2 me?
Would the behaviour improve if you replaced copyResampled() with
copyResized() in Slim::Web::Graphics? That's not a solution, just one
more data point. The resulting artwork won't be as smooth as with
copyResampled().
--
Michael
I would suggest trying it: it is very nifty and I don't think any of the
blockers are of the completely-non-functional-type.
This also lets you find your own I can't rely on this until...
blockers and get those bugs in. If you can deal with a couple weeks of
should I trust this? doubts in your
+1 for try it and see.
I have been running trunk for as long as I can remember, updating
frequently and regularly. I think it's broken *completely* about once,
and that was when 6.5.x forked to become 7.
It really isn't bad software.
R.
___
beta
I've been having similar problems on-and-off. Sometimes even accessing
the web interface would not improve things.
The latest incident seems to have been resolved (can't be 100% certain
since I've been fiddling with so many things), by ensuring that the MAC
address of the player is set exactly
Just a small note from a non-techie: I have been running SC 7 since
about November last year. I update regularly (about once a week)
without any compelling reason other than get latest functionality.
7.0 has given me the best experience yet! I have had no drop outs, no
service shut downs, and it
I think I'll just add music less frequently for the time being, as I
know next to nothing about coding Perl.
No need to know perl: we added an option in Settings/Advanced/Performance
to use a faster Resize algorithm instead of the nicer Resample. Please
give this a try.
Michael
Perhaps a silly question, but you don't have both SBRs powered up at the
same time, do you?
--
Balthazar_B
Balthazar_B's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7366
View this thread:
I'd second that. SC is looking much slicker than SS now and the upgrade
is far more than cosmetic: the performance and functionality is
excellent.
--
smc2911
smc2911's Profile:
The only problems I had were the reported issues with the deb packages
some weeks ago (that wiped out my settings), and I have been upgrading
from 'unstable' like once every week or so for the last couple of
months with no major problems.
Going to change my repository now to download the
32 matches
Mail list logo
