The current keyboard code (by jesterking I think) and upcoming 3D
mouse support (by me) both rely on the Windows RawInput API, which
only works on XP or newer. Far as I know, that is the only hard
technical reason blocking a Win2000 build.
As a fellow user of perfectly fine retro systems, I sympat
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mike Erwin wrote:
> The current keyboard code (by jesterking I think) and upcoming 3D
> mouse support (by me) both rely on the Windows RawInput API, which
> only works on XP or newer. Far as I know, that is the only hard
> technical reason blocking a Win2000 build.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 04:09:07PM +0200, Knapp wrote:
>
> Did you guys read his name and email address? This, "person", does not even
> expect to get an answer or do any work. He is just out to waste our time.
> (If I am wrong, sorry).
A similar post was recently made on the Blender development
Can anyone cite where Blender's internal representation of middle grey
is? Has one been defined?
It would seem that for ingestion and output, the reference model would
be wise to locate one. For example, within Open Color IO, the
reference compositing space appears to select a value that aligns wi
So far, I've been experimenting with several files and uptake tools
using Blender in conjunction with Nuke. I have yet to be able to find
a pattern that delivers proper alpha channels.Perhaps someone here can
shed some light on the matter.
It has been noted before that there has been some mishandl
On 15/07/11 11:16, Blankfirstname Blanklastname wrote:
> I'm saddened that a lot of work is done for Blender to work on BSD,
> Linux, MAC and XP but in the process you developers left us Windows 2000
> users out in the cold.
we cannot help it that we cannot build for win2k. Blender's internals
ar
On 07/17/2011 12:43 AM, Michael Fox wrote:
> On 15/07/11 11:16, Blankfirstname Blanklastname wrote:
>> I'm saddened that a lot of work is done for Blender to work on BSD,
>> Linux, MAC and XP but in the process you developers left us Windows 2000
>> users out in the cold.
> we cannot help it that
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 01:05:59AM +0200, Mathias Panzenböck wrote:
> On 07/17/2011 12:43 AM, Michael Fox wrote:
> >
> > You Couldn't be furthur from the truth, comparing win2k and XP is like
> > comparing apples and oranges, they are vastly different internally,
> > win2k is 16bit OS winXP in 32B
