ters digest..."
> > >
> > >
> > > Today's Topics:
> > >
> > > 1. No Monday or Tuesday meetings for the time being (Dalai Felinto)
> > > 2. Re: No Monday or Tuesday meetings for the time being
> > >(Ray Molenk
asynchronously.
> > * [new] At the end of Mondays I do a final pass in the page and post it
> > here.
> >
> > [1] - https://devtalk.blender.org/t/15-february-2021-upcoming/17475.
> >
> > Any feedback is welcome.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > -Dalai-
> &
e being
> > (Ray Molenkamp)
> >
> >
> > ------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:33:28 +0100
> > From: Dalai Felinto
> > To: bf-blender developers
> > S
(Dalai Felinto)
2. Re: No Monday or Tuesday meetings for the time being
(Ray Molenkamp)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:33:28 +0100
From: Dalai Felinto
To: bf-blender developers
Subject: [Bf-committers] No
Thanks, Dalai!
That definitely clears things up for me, at least. I appreciate you taking the
time to write that up.
--Nathan
On Monday, February 15th, 2021 at 20:40, Dalai Felinto via Bf-committers
wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
> First let me say that this was poorly communicated on my end. I wil
Hi Nathan,
First let me say that this was poorly communicated on my end. I will try
to clarify now.
The meetings were not effective as they used to be a few years ago. One
of the main purposes of the meetings was to review and agree on
development and design proposals. This was a good moment
.
--Ryan
On 2021-02-09 06:00 AM, bf-committers-requ...@blender.org wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:33:28 +0100
From: Dalai Felinto
To: bf-blender developers
Subject: [Bf-committers] No Monday or Tuesday meetings for the time
being
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; cha
Hi Dalai,
> I talked a bit with Ray over chat to try to clear some things out. The main
> issue seemed to be the "how" this change happened/was decided/was
> communicated, not so much the change itself. I will keep that in mind for
> the next disrupted change.
It's great that you were able to tal
Hi,
I talked a bit with Ray over chat to try to clear some things out. The main
issue seemed to be the "how" this change happened/was decided/was
communicated, not so much the change itself. I will keep that in mind for
the next disrupted change.
As an addendum, there have been some interesting
Apologies, my weakness for "snappy" responses got the better
of me rather than taking a deep breath and discussing the
issue at hand.
The decision has been unilaterally made, which is your
prerogative, however when questioned why this decision
was made I do not think "why don't you explain why not
i hear the Tuesday meetings are a joy
--Ray
On 2021-02-09 8:59 a.m., Dalai Felinto wrote:
> Hi Ray,
>
> Which reasons do you see to keep the meeting(s)?
>
> Thanks,
> Dalai
>
> Op ma 8 feb. 2021 om 17:46 schreef Ray Molenkamp via Bf-committers
> mailto:bf-committers@blender.org>>:
>
> That s
Hi Ray,
Which reasons do you see to keep the meeting(s)?
Thanks,
Dalai
Op ma 8 feb. 2021 om 17:46 schreef Ray Molenkamp via Bf-committers <
bf-committers@blender.org>:
> That seems somewhat strange and out of the blue (at least for me), the
> lack of reasoning for putting them on hold especiall
That seems somewhat strange and out of the blue (at least for me), the lack of
reasoning for putting them on hold especially for the Tuesday ones you seem
fond of is concerning, what am i missing here?
--Ray
On 2021-02-08 9:33 a.m., Dalai Felinto via Bf-committers wrote:
> Hi,
> The Monday (dev
Hi,
The Monday (developers) and the Tuesday (modules) meetings are currently on
hold. The Monday one has very little quorum and is rarely useful.
The Tuesday talks (module meetings) are quite a joy actually and I will
miss talking to the modules owners 1:1. But they have always being more
like a
14 matches
Mail list logo
