Adam, I agree whole heartedly with your analysis of everyone creating
their own standard!
I have a suggestion which will solve this whole problem which came to
mind after reading the recent comment about RSS feeds and script groups.
Make a script group searchable, i.e. search groups request s
Even though I can understand both sides in this discussion I still
think it can be expected by the average BD user to read the alert
that is given at the first launch of BD after the update to the new
attached files system and do the necessary steps to adjust his
preferences accordingly. Re
On 2008-01-29, at 8:23 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>
> On 29 Jan 2008, at 5:16 PM, Chris Goedde wrote:
>
>> On Jan 28, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>>>
>>> I say that because there is a choice: do you want %u, %U, %n, and
>>> how
>>> many characters and where? We can't know, beca
On Jan 29, 2008, at 10:23 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>
> On 29 Jan 2008, at 5:16 PM, Chris Goedde wrote:
>
>> On Jan 28, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>>>
>>> I say that because there is a choice: do you want %u, %U, %n, and
>>> how
>>> many characters and where? We can't know, be
On 29 Jan 2008, at 5:16 PM, Chris Goedde wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>>
>> I say that because there is a choice: do you want %u, %U, %n, and how
>> many characters and where? We can't know, because we can't
>> readUsersMind. Doing something arbitrary is wrong. M
Hi Christiaan,
it's filed as Bug ID# 5712415.
Sth. to add: in the context-menu in Finder there is "Skim (Standard)"
and then below "Skim 1.0" mentioned so it does point to an older
version accessible via backup. Nevertheless this is confusing.
Greetings,
Rolf
Am 29.01.2008 um 15:03 schrie
On Jan 28, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>
> I say that because there is a choice: do you want %u, %U, %n, and how
> many characters and where? We can't know, because we can't
> readUsersMind. Doing something arbitrary is wrong. Moreover just
> sticking it at the end would be wrong bec
On Jan 29, 2008, at 5:59 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>> It appears that I should use <$remoteURL> to access remote urls, and
>> the built-in template editor provides <$remoteURL.absoluteString/> as
>> the appropriate tag/modifier for a url for a web page. That yields a
>> url when used in a templ
Hi
As an alternative to creating a script & script group in BD, you
could set up a script in an RSS reader to create a new BD item. I
have an Applescript which will create a new BibDesk item based
(imperfectly, but a best guess) on an item in an RSS feed in
NetNewsWire, available here: htt
This was your last mail? (I got the other reply after this one).
On 29 Jan 2008, at 2:37 PM, Rolf Schmolling wrote:
> Correction:
>
> it does seem to be a problem with Apple because I just checked: from
> context-menu it opens a version from TimeMachine-backup.
>
And it's probably the same versi
Hi Christiaan,
Skim is the default viewer for pdfs on my machine, and double-clicking
opens the right one on my startup-disk.
Note that this is not in any way critical, there is a workaround
(showing pdf in finder, then opening with appropriate (different)
viewer etc.) it just looks wrong.
Correction:
it does seem to be a problem with Apple because I just checked: from
context-menu it opens a version from TimeMachine-backup.
Will send feedback to Apple.
Greetings,
Rolf
Am 29.01.2008 um 14:16 schrieb Christiaan Hofman:
> Is Skim the default app for PDFs? If so, this is mostly
Is Skim the default app for PDFs? If so, this is mostly a problem of
Apple, because it chooses a random copy as the default (and that's
the one we always include). E.g. if you just double-click in Finder,
which one will it choose? On my computer it consistently chooses the
wrong copy. I fil
Hi Christiaan,
I tried the latest build:
http://bibdesk.demokratia.org/beta/BibDesk-20080128.dmg
Unfortunately it doesn't work (fully): The context-menu is properly de-
populated BUT when chosing the ONLY version of Skim available it STILL
opens some version from TimeMachine-Backup.
The scr
You can add a script group with a script that reads RSS feeds. Adam
has made a script to read pubmed, which is available at .
The problem with adding a generic RSS feed script is that we don't
know what we get, so we don't know how to interpret the RSS feed. It
depends on the source of the f
On 29 Jan 2008, at 2:53 AM, James Harrison wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2008, at 5:38 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>
>> So in templates you should most often use something like
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> instead of $urls.Local-Url.path, samilar for the URL. Also
>> $fields.URL, and $URL,
Hi all,
Not sure how difficult that'd be but, pubmed (and i am sure others as
well) has this great feature for saving research items as rss feeds,
which allows to quickly see if a new publication matching your
research criteria has come up. I do think integrating an rss reader
to bibdesk
17 matches
Mail list logo
