Re: [Bibdesk-users] Annote field: search

2011-08-07 Thread Christian Pleul
On 08.08.2011, at 07:24, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: > > On Aug 7, 2011, at 15:04 , Christian Pleul wrote: > >> >> On 07.08.2011, at 17:54, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: >> >>> >>> On Aug 7, 2011, at 08:03 , Christian Pleul wrote: >>> Sorry, if I asked it before and just forgot. Anyway, would it n

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Annote field: search

2011-08-07 Thread Adam R. Maxwell
On Aug 7, 2011, at 15:04 , Christian Pleul wrote: > > On 07.08.2011, at 17:54, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: > >> >> On Aug 7, 2011, at 08:03 , Christian Pleul wrote: >> >>> Sorry, if I asked it before and just forgot. Anyway, would it not a an >>> interesting feature, since I can imagine that peop

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Annote field: search

2011-08-07 Thread Alexander H. Montgomery
All fields are "searchable" through using Smart Groups. Just hit command-option-G and you'll be good to go with Annote, Abstract, or any other field you can dream up. Plus the searches are saved. Thinking out loud here, perhaps there is some tweak to the UI that could make this more obvious? Al

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Advanced searching the database

2011-08-07 Thread Christian Pleul
On 07.08.2011, at 17:58, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: > > On Aug 7, 2011, at 08:23 , Christian Pleul wrote: > >>> I guess we could add recent searches to the search field. >>> >>> Christiaan >> >> That would be a nice step! > > Just revert to BibDesk 0.97 or so :). IIRC that got really messy, so

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Annote field: search

2011-08-07 Thread Christian Pleul
On 07.08.2011, at 17:54, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: > > On Aug 7, 2011, at 08:03 , Christian Pleul wrote: > >> Sorry, if I asked it before and just forgot. Anyway, would it not a an >> interesting feature, since I can imagine that people who studying e.g. >> research papers use this field to put

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Advanced searching the database

2011-08-07 Thread Adam R. Maxwell
On Aug 7, 2011, at 08:23 , Christian Pleul wrote: >> I guess we could add recent searches to the search field. >> >> Christiaan > > That would be a nice step! Just revert to BibDesk 0.97 or so :). IIRC that got really messy, so we removed the recent searches feature, either when regex search

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Annote field: search

2011-08-07 Thread Adam R. Maxwell
On Aug 7, 2011, at 08:03 , Christian Pleul wrote: > Sorry, if I asked it before and just forgot. Anyway, would it not a an > interesting feature, since I can imagine that people who studying e.g. > research papers use this field to put their notes and excerpts in the annote > field. Interesti

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Advanced searching the database

2011-08-07 Thread Christian Pleul
On 07.08.2011, at 17:18, Christiaan Hofman wrote: > > On Aug 7, 2011, at 14:51, Christian Pleul wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I find it a bit complicated to use customized searching to e.g. exclude >> something from the results such as >> >> Experiment !remote !2010 >> >> Anyway, could these searc

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Advanced searching the database

2011-08-07 Thread Christiaan Hofman
On Aug 7, 2011, at 14:51, Christian Pleul wrote: > Hi, > > I find it a bit complicated to use customized searching to e.g. exclude > something from the results such as > > Experiment !remote !2010 > > Anyway, could these searches (Experiment !remote !2010), not the results, > saved in some w

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Annote field: search

2011-08-07 Thread Christian Pleul
On 07.08.2011, at 16:58, Christiaan Hofman wrote: > On Aug 7, 2011, at 14:30, Christian Pleul wrote: > >> Would it be possible to _only_ search in the "Annote" field, as it is >> possible for "Title", "Skim Notes" etc? >> >> >> Best >> -- >> Christian >> >> >> -The next generation of i

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Annote field: search

2011-08-07 Thread Christiaan Hofman
On Aug 7, 2011, at 14:30, Christian Pleul wrote: > Would it be possible to _only_ search in the "Annote" field, as it is > possible for "Title", "Skim Notes" etc? > > > Best > -- > Christian > > > -The next generation of interesting software will be done on the Macintosh, > not the IB

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Annote field: spell checking

2011-08-07 Thread Christian Pleul
Arrggglgghhh... Thank you very much! -- Christian -Spam will be a thing of the past in two years' time.- Bill Gates, Jan 2004 On 07.08.2011, at 14:44, Alex Hamann wrote: > It's already available: > Edit => Spelling => Check Spelling while typing > > > > On 07.08.2011, at 14:27, Chr

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Annote field: spell checking

2011-08-07 Thread Alex Hamann
It's already available: Edit => Spelling => Check Spelling while typing On 07.08.2011, at 14:27, Christian Pleul wrote: > Would it be possible to have spell checking in the "Annote" field? > > > Thanks > -- > Christian > > > -We've really achieved the ideal of what I wanted Microsoft

[Bibdesk-users] Advanced searching the database

2011-08-07 Thread Christian Pleul
Hi, I find it a bit complicated to use customized searching to e.g. exclude something from the results such as Experiment !remote !2010 Anyway, could these searches (Experiment !remote !2010), not the results, saved in some way? Best, -- Christian -Spam will be a thing of the past

[Bibdesk-users] Annote field: search

2011-08-07 Thread Christian Pleul
Would it be possible to _only_ search in the "Annote" field, as it is possible for "Title", "Skim Notes" etc? Best -- Christian -The next generation of interesting software will be done on the Macintosh, not the IBM PC.- Bill Gates, Nov 1984 -

[Bibdesk-users] Annote field: spell checking

2011-08-07 Thread Christian Pleul
Would it be possible to have spell checking in the "Annote" field? Thanks -- Christian -We've really achieved the ideal of what I wanted Microsoft to become.- Bill Gates, June 2008 -- BlackBerry® DevCon America