On Sep 16, 2011, at 11:30, Christian Pleul wrote:
Hey,
Using a plain percent sign (%) in the annotation, yields to a compilation
error (Runaway argument?) when using pdflatex during the third step*
(pdflatex biblatex pdflatex*).
Best,
--
Christian
That'r right.
On Sep 16, 2011, at 11:50, Christian Pleul wrote:
On 16.09.2011, at 11:40, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
On Sep 16, 2011, at 11:30, Christian Pleul wrote:
Hey,
Using a plain percent sign (%) in the annotation, yields to a compilation
error (Runaway argument?) when using pdflatex
On 16.09.2011, at 12:11, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
On Sep 16, 2011, at 11:50, Christian Pleul wrote:
On 16.09.2011, at 11:40, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
On Sep 16, 2011, at 11:30, Christian Pleul wrote:
Hey,
Using a plain percent sign (%) in the annotation, yields to a
On Sep 16, 2011, at 16:39, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Sep 16, 2011, at 04:28 , Christian Pleul wrote:
On 16.09.2011, at 12:11, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
Feature. An percent in bibtex data is not valid, or more precisely it's a
comment character.
IIRC the bibtex grammar doesn't
On 16.09.2011, at 16:39, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Sep 16, 2011, at 04:28 , Christian Pleul wrote:
On 16.09.2011, at 12:11, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
Feature. An percent in bibtex data is not valid, or more precisely it's a
comment character.
[snip]
Having a % in your file is
On Sep 16, 2011, at 07:57 , Christian Pleul wrote:
I think that happens: it is written to the bbl (checked and it is there) and
when it gets processed by the pdflatex step the error occurs.
What does the complete bbl entry for that item look like? Never having used
biblatex/biber, I've no
On Sep 16, 2011, at 07:45 , Christiaan Hofman wrote:
I really meant tex. Bibtex treats percents in a field value as a normal
character.
I figured you knew that :). Doesn't btparse treat % at top level as a comment?
I don't have time to look, but I do recall that it has a couple of minor
On Sep 16, 2011, at 17:17, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Sep 16, 2011, at 07:45 , Christiaan Hofman wrote:
I really meant tex. Bibtex treats percents in a field value as a normal
character.
I figured you knew that :). Doesn't btparse treat % at top level as a
comment? I don't have
On 16.09.2011, at 17:10, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:On Sep 16, 2011, at 07:57 , Christian Pleul wrote:I think that happens: it is written to the bbl (checked and it is there) and when it gets processed by the pdflatex step the error occurs.What does the complete bbl entry for that item look like? Never
On Sep 16, 2011, at 08:25, Christian Pleul wrote:
On 16.09.2011, at 17:10, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
What does the complete bbl entry for that item look like? Never having used
biblatex/biber, I've no idea what's going on.
See the file attached. The annotation field includes the percent
On Sep 16, 2011, at 08:17, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
Doesn't btparse treat % at top level as a comment?
Edit: yes, it does. From bt_language.pod
COMMENT \%~[\n]*\n
WHITESPACE[\ \r\t]+
JUNK ~[\@\n\ \r\t]+
Old-school bibtex users remove the @
11 matches
Mail list logo
