On 9 May 2008, at 10:17 AM, James Owen wrote:
>>>
>>> However, for some reason, BibDesk is no longer putting the contents
>>> of the doi: field into the Doi: field in my bibtex archive. It
>>> used to, before 1.3.15. is there some problem with case
>>> sensitivity? If I added a "doi" field as we
>>
>> However, for some reason, BibDesk is no longer putting the contents
>> of the doi: field into the Doi: field in my bibtex archive. It
>> used to, before 1.3.15. is there some problem with case
>> sensitivity? If I added a "doi" field as well as a "Doi" field,
>> would that work? It s
>>
>> My workflow is:
>>
>> go to journal e.g. Phys. Rev. B, find article. Download pdf.
>> Meanwhile, at the button marked article options, select "view
>> bibtex". (Other journals do this differently, but get yourself to
>> the same state.) This goes to a new browser page with the bibtex
On 9 May 2008, at 12:14 AM, Robin wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 7:41 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi There,
>> I am sorry to bother you, but I found myself rather lost when using
>> Bibdesk.
>> I truly love it, and I am physicist/chemist using BibTeX for quite
>> some
>> time, b
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 7:41 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi There,
> I am sorry to bother you, but I found myself rather lost when using Bibdesk.
> I truly love it, and I am physicist/chemist using BibTeX for quite some
> time, but I am fairly new to mac and to Bibdesk. I would like to as
On 05/08/08 11:44, "Adam M. Goldstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 8, 2008, at 10:44 AM, James Owen wrote:
>
>>> However, for some reason, BibDesk is no longer putting the contents of the
>>> doi: field into the Doi: field in my bibtex archive. It used to, before
>>> 1.3.15. is there som
On May 8, 2008, at 10:44 AM, James Owen wrote:
On 6 May 2008, at 20:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi There,
I am sorry to bother you, but I found myself rather lost when using
Bibdesk. I truly love it, and I am physicist/chemist using BibTeX
for quite some time, but I am fairly new to mac
On 8 May 2008, at 4:44 PM, James Owen wrote:
On 6 May 2008, at 20:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi There,
I am sorry to bother you, but I found myself rather lost when using
Bibdesk. I truly love it, and I am physicist/chemist using BibTeX
for quite some time, but I am fairly new to mac
On 6 May 2008, at 20:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi There,
I am sorry to bother you, but I found myself rather lost when using
Bibdesk. I truly love it, and I am physicist/chemist using BibTeX
for quite some time, but I am fairly new to mac and to Bibdesk. I
would like to ask, if you ca
On May 6, 2008, at 2:41 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi There,
> I am sorry to bother you, but I found myself rather lost when using
> Bibdesk. I truly love it, and I am physicist/chemist using BibTeX
> for quite some time, but I am fairly new to mac and to Bibdesk.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi There,
> I am sorry to bother you, but I found myself rather lost when using Bibdesk.
> I truly love it, and I am physicist/chemist using BibTeX for quite some time,
> but I am fairly new to mac and to Bibdesk. I would like to ask
11 matches
Mail list logo