Of course I could just copy and paste all the zones also in 'custom' view
but it doubles the configuration size.
On 27.01.09 17:26, Chris Burton wrote:
I've been using an include file for zones common between multiple views, it
might help in your case too.
I'm afraid they won't eat the same
In message 49800cfd.nihabiqjcalhfl+u%akos...@andykosela.com, Andy Kosela writ
es:
Reinis Rozitis r...@roze.lv wrote:
I've been using an include file for zones common between multiple
views, might help in your case too.
Thanks somehow didnt think about this way. Pretty much takes to
On 27.01.09 10:18, Al Stu wrote:
I not only say it, I have demonstrated it.
But you have demonstrated something different than we're discussing all the
time.
BIND is the DNS system we are discussing.
Have not looked to see if that specifically is spec'ed in an RFC.
Yes other DNS
Dean Clapper wrote:
I'm trying to troubleshoot why we are getting a lot of disabling EDNS
messages in /var/log/messages.
We are running bind-9.5.0.P2 on a linux box.
[...]
Jan 27 11:43:39 ns0 named[27764]: too many timeouts resolving
'196.198.117.216.zen.spamhaus.org/A' (in
In that case you can use either views or a split dns
Regards.
Serge Fonville
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Luis Silva luisfilsi...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, basically what I need is a forwarder. Basically I want an internal
network but external queries must be handled by another server.
Sorry remembered wrong, it's not free. But not that expensive either.
Yeah now I remember, I browsed for a free firewall for server platform for
days, but didn't find any.
But have been very happy with the Net Firewall.
Jukka
Tony Toews [MVP] tto...@telusplanet.net kirjoitti
Hello, I am wondering the technical possibility of a DNS change. Even
if it is technically possible, I also want to make sure it is
compliant as well.
I would like to resolve any and all requests to a fixed IP, if there
is no zone in place. While I understand I can create a zone for
Hi Folks,
This is regarding the recent security threat CVE-2009-0025.
We are using DNS 9.3.0 and unfortunately, we cannot upgrade (management
issues) to 9.3.6 (As suggested in ISC website)
ISC's website suggests to Upgrade OpenSSL to at least OpenSSL 0.9.8j and
then to upgrade to
In article glp3rc$23p...@sf1.isc.org,
Jan Arild =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lindstr=F8m?= j...@telenor.net wrote:
Hi,
ah, of course. I did not think about it as a Solaris bug.
I patched BIND 9.6.0-P1 os.c code so it first checks for the diretory
before it tries the fast approach of just running mkdir. And
What specifically are you intending to wildcard? com.? net.? .?
If so, then you would be implicitly making your name servers
authoritative for domains for which your servers are not supposed to be
authoritative.
Ben Bridges
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
In message fl82o4hqjudbc65bkfk08ilg3lmk4hq...@4ax.com, Tony Toews [MVP] wri
tes:
Tony Toews [MVP] tto...@telusplanet.net wrote:
FWIW In the last 28 hours I have the following alleged IP addresses and coun
t in my
log file.
Real lookups 1665
204.15.80.50 4
3.217.28.226 1144
Hello, my past post about wildcarding the . in a named server seems
it may be wrought with issues in the long term.
In short, my issues is a auto website creation tool that needs to be
simple for users to change their registrar data, and have their site
be served up.
The old method
On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message 30e0039f-b0fd-4322-b0e0-52eeefa76...@newgeo.com, Scott
Haneda writ
es:
I can remove the entire DNS management, zone creation, and deltion if
I wildcard. Any domain in which they enter in my clients ns's will
resolve automatically as
Use the DLZ extension. It's been around for a while.
I.e. put the following in your named.conf and use whatever interface you
wish. I use Ant with a few modifications. I don't have nearly the
number of domains that you do so my simple system works fine.
dlz postgres zone {
database
Damnit, ever time I search this stuff out, I search for named
something-or-other and should use BIND in my search :)
I am going to test deploy on my worksation on OS X. Named comes up
with relative ease, just add a key and I am pretty much up and
running, albeit out of date, but for
In message 29c7b7bc-f017-4404-b011-8b50206c7...@newgeo.com, Scott Haneda writ
es:
Damnit, ever time I search this stuff out, I search for named
something-or-other and should use BIND in my search :)
I am going to test deploy on my worksation on OS X. Named comes up
with relative ease,
16 matches
Mail list logo
