Re: bind replication

2010-12-31 Thread pyh
Not a how-to, but it is covered in the BIND FAQ on the ISC website.. http://www.isc.org/software/bind/faq Then look at the entry for: My slave server for both an internal and an external view has both views transferred from the same master view - how to resolve? Thanks. If I

Re: bind replication

2010-12-31 Thread Alan Clegg
On 12/31/2010 9:50 PM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: > Alan Clegg writes: >> >> Done carefully (which will be the case in all circumstances), doing zone >> transfers within views of many zones is no more "likely to get broken" >> than doing it with external mechanisms. > > So going with bind's zone

Re: Dynamic zone...

2010-12-31 Thread Alan Clegg
On 12/31/2010 9:59 PM, Lyle Giese wrote: > My approach would be to use a dynamic host service like dyndns.com. > > I setup a remote1.homedns.org with a cname in my zone: > > remote.abc.com 3600 in cname remote1.homedns.org > > And use a dynamic dns client on the laptop. Then you don't even car

Re: Dynamic zone...

2010-12-31 Thread Lyle Giese
On 12/31/2010 5:46 AM, G.W. Haywood wrote: Hi there, On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 Jeff Justice wrote: ... I have a computer on a remote network that gets its IP dynamically from the ISP. I need to always know where that computer is. ... if my main domain for our company were: abc.com then it would b

Re: bind replication

2010-12-31 Thread pyh
Alan Clegg writes: Done carefully (which will be the case in all circumstances), doing zone transfers within views of many zones is no more "likely to get broken" than doing it with external mechanisms. So going with bind's zone-transfer is there a howto document for this purpose? Thank

Re: bind replication

2010-12-31 Thread Steve Arntzen
> Done carefully (which will be the case in all circumstances), doing zone > transfers within views of many zones is no more "likely to get broken" > than doing it with external mechanisms. > > Been there, done that, have the tee-shirt and certainly don't want to > use rsync. > > AlanC > I wan

Re: bind replication

2010-12-31 Thread Gary Wallis
Alan Clegg wrote: On 12/31/2010 9:39 AM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: Ben Croswell writes: It seems like you are making the process more complex, instead of just letting BIND do it's job. No. because I have many zones, and each zone has some views. So the standard zone-transfer will most likel

Re: bind replication

2010-12-31 Thread Alan Clegg
On 12/31/2010 9:39 AM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: > Ben Croswell writes: >> It seems like you >> are making the process more complex, instead of just letting BIND do it's >> job. > > No. because I have many zones, and each zone has some views. > So the standard zone-transfer will most likely get

Re: bind replication

2010-12-31 Thread pyh
Jack Tavares writes: If you wished to sync zone files in this manner, with dynamic zones, you would need to freeze the zones on the sending side, which forces a write of the data that is in the journal file to the zone file, freeze the zones on the receiving side then copy the files over

RE: bind replication

2010-12-31 Thread Jack Tavares
A further complication on this is if you are using dynamic updates. If you are using dynamic zones, bind will create journal files. If you were to copy over the zone files and journal files and do a reload, bind determines whether or not to reload the zone based on the timestamp of the zone file.

Re: bind replication

2010-12-31 Thread pyh
Ben Croswell writes: It seems like you are making the process more complex, instead of just letting BIND do it's job. No. because I have many zones, and each zone has some views. So the standard zone-transfer will most likely get broken due to the complexity. Thanks. __

Re: bind replication

2010-12-31 Thread Ben Croswell
What technical problem are you trying to solve with rsync? It seems like you are making the process more complex, instead of just letting BIND do it's job. On Dec 31, 2010 9:02 AM, wrote: > Torinthiel writes: > > >> >> If you know which zone has changed, than you can do "rndc reload zonename". >>

Re: bind replication

2010-12-31 Thread Gary Wallis
p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: Torinthiel writes: If you know which zone has changed, than you can do "rndc reload zonename". If you don't, than "rndc reload" reloads all zones. You could also try "rndc reconfig", but I think it will only load new zonesm the ones just added in configuration,

Re: bind replication

2010-12-31 Thread pyh
Torinthiel writes: If you know which zone has changed, than you can do "rndc reload zonename". If you don't, than "rndc reload" reloads all zones. You could also try "rndc reconfig", but I think it will only load new zonesm the ones just added in configuration, not never wersions of old zone

Re: Dynamic zone...

2010-12-31 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 Jeff Justice wrote: > ... > I have a computer on a remote network that gets its IP dynamically > from the ISP. I need to always know where that computer is. > ... > if my main domain for our company were: > > abc.com > > then it would be nice to have: > > remote.abc

Re: question about multiple queries in a single dns packet

2010-12-31 Thread Federico Barbieri
hmm not the answer I was hoping for but clear and final... I've been interpreting http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1035.html and guessed that QDCOUNT could have been used that way. will look for alternative solutions. Thanks a lot guys for the quick reply. fede On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:52 P

Re: Dynamic zone...

2010-12-31 Thread Mark Elkins
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 09:56 +0200, Mark Elkins wrote: > I do this for my Laptops. They can pick up an address from the local > network (where ever I am visiting, Airports, Data Centers, friends, work > - etc) and then update the info back home on my own network. > > Basics - when DHCPCD gets an IP

Re: bind replication

2010-12-31 Thread Torinthiel
Dnia 2010-12-31 09:58 Nuno Paquete napisał(a): > >No dia 31 de Dez de 2010, às 08:18, "p...@mail.nsbeta.info" escreveu: > >> Anand Buddhdev writes: >>> On 31/12/2010 05:33, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: Hi, Is it a right way to run rsync for bind's zone files replication? If we

Re: bind replication

2010-12-31 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 31/12/2010 10:58, Nuno Paquete wrote: > No dia 31 de Dez de 2010, às 08:18, "p...@mail.nsbeta.info" > escreveu: > >> Anand Buddhdev writes: >>> On 31/12/2010 05:33, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: Hi, Is it a right way to run rsync for bind's zone files replication? If we have

Re: bind replication

2010-12-31 Thread Nuno Paquete
No dia 31 de Dez de 2010, às 08:18, "p...@mail.nsbeta.info" escreveu: > Anand Buddhdev writes: >> On 31/12/2010 05:33, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: >>> Hi, >>> Is it a right way to run rsync for bind's zone files replication? >>> If we have dozons of zones, each zone has more than one view,

Re: bind replication

2010-12-31 Thread pyh
Anand Buddhdev writes: On 31/12/2010 05:33, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: Hi, Is it a right way to run rsync for bind's zone files replication? If we have dozons of zones, each zone has more than one view, under this case setup the master/slave with standard zone-traff is the hard way IMO. Than

Re: bind replication

2010-12-31 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 31/12/2010 05:33, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: > Hi, > Is it a right way to run rsync for bind's zone files replication? > If we have dozons of zones, each zone has more than one view, under this > case setup the master/slave with standard zone-traff is the hard way IMO. > Thanks. Yes, that's