nfo: 17 unexpected RCODE
resolving 'dryfire.com/NS/IN': 213.162.97.177#53
A search for "17 unexpected RCODE" seems to indicate this might be
caused by incompatibility between SIT/DNS cookies and older versions of
NSD. Is this also w
y:b9agent_en to
expose BIND9 statistics via SNMP - you might give that one a try?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.i
t_en to expose counters from BIND
through SNMP, which you can then easily get into Cacti.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists
Solaris
8 installation I still have access to - the BIND bundled on that one was
8.2.4.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.o
belongs to some customer)
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
.16.172.in-addr.arpa IN PTR +
talk.l.google.com IN A +
gmail-pop.l.google.com IN A +
gmail-imap.l.google.com IN A +
...and similar variations of these.
Have any of you seen something like this before?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lis
Stayvoid wrote:
> Is it connected with my zone file settings (which are specified on the
> side of my registrar) or with BIND?
Hard to tell, I don't think you've told us the name of the domain..?
Give the name, and it should be much easier to figure out what's going on.
Den 15. juli 2012 kl. 16:57 skrev Benny Pedersen :
> change to gentoo/funtoo ?
Some might prefer to run the same Linux distribution on all their servers,
changing to something like Gentoo just to get BIND running seems a bit overkill.
Regards
Eivind Ol
usage
- latency (how long does it take to get a reply)
- packet loss / lost queries
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
et one result and be at the mercy of the external
nameservers.
You will probably get the highest result if you only ask for pre-cached
answers, in which case reaching 100k qps (and higher) on a single server should
be easy (with some not-too-old hardware)
Regards
Eivind
Use the full zone name in the zone definition.
zone "cairosource"
Regards
Eivind Olsen
Den 21. mai 2012 kl. 16:33 skrev "Amira Othman" :
> Hi all
>
> I have configured bind9 on centos 5.8 but I still can't nslookup my domain.
> Below are my confi
BIND is to tell BIND that it
shouldn't even try to use IPv6 (start the "named" command with option
"-4").
If you're using for example RHEL / CentOS with the vendor-provided RPMs,
you can do this by editing /etc/sysconfig/named and adding/editing t
. Indeed RFC3197
> (https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3197.txt) tells a cautionary tale.
I've been using a net-snmp subagent called "B9Agent", with good success.
It doesn't parse the XML statistics data but uses the statistics-file
instead. For more details, see
http://www.l3jane.net/w
off with
fewer threads but higher clock speeds from typical Intel/AMD systems.
(caveat: I haven't benchmarked BIND 9.9.x, which might have improved
this).
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to un
ached
> [root@localhost ~]#
Is there a local host firewall (iptables?) running on the DNS server? And
if so, is tcp and udp port 53 open?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
fr
1, I'd double the amount of threads?
Will there be any real world advantage (or disadvantage) to specifying for
example a couple of specific listen-on statements instead of using the
listen-on any?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://
ffic (not enough to strain it, the load is
normally around 0.02 or thereabout).
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
Adamiec, Lawrence wrote:
> Is it possible to have one IP in multiple zone files for forward
> lookups? What type of troubles would be encountered?
Like, having www.example.com and ftp.example.org point to the same IP
address?
Yes, it's nothing weird about it.
Regards
E
sachin k wrote:
> Can someone please help me understand why this is not working?
A few suggestions:
- try looking up names with dig instead of nslookup
- do a tcpdump while testing, to see where packets are going, and whether
you get anything back at all.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor
orking:
ns1.ranksitt.net is giving return code REFUSE when I ask it for the NS
records to rankstel.net, and ns1.rankstel.net just isn't giving any answer
back (timeout). Whoever owns those nameservers should probably consider
fixing them.
PS! Don't just reply to a previous email when you write
both of these:
1) Disable or at least configure IPv6 properly on your server
2) Tell BIND to not use IPv6 transport, typically by starting "named" with
the command line option "-4". How to do that depends on your operating
system / distr
s something like libspf (http://www.libspf2.org) is what you want?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
you're pretty much telling one of your
views "There, I _might_ have changed the contents of your zonefile, so now
you'll need to check it again".
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bi
ith the new version - just in case (I don't know your setup,
whether you use anything "odd" like the DLZ and so on).
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bi
ward to what you're planning for 9.something - I still have
more cores I could in theory gain some speed from.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users
so, you mentioned using tcpreplay, which is also apparantly
single-threaded , making the comparison like this:
1*1.6GHz vs 1*2.33GHz.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this
iharrathi@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
> The 64 bit server(server1) is faster than the 32 bit server (server2).
Really? I thought you said the 64 bit server had a CPU with 1.6GHz cores,
and the 32 bit server had 2.33GHz cores?
Regards
Eivind Ol
- as far as I know tcpreplay is single-threaded - which also suggests the
reason it might win out on the 32 bit system is again due to the clock
frequency.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to u
Rodrigo Faria Tavares wrote:
> [root@centos ~]# grep 4 /etc/sysconfig/named
> #OPTIONS ="-4"
Looks like you have commented out that line. Remove the # character there,
if you want to really disable IPv6 in BIND.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
in /etc/named.rfc1912.zones around line 10, and in
/etc/named.conf around line 35. The error message suggests you have
defined the root zone "." twice.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-user
HEN: Tue Jun 21 19:15:21 2011
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 107
Eivind-mac:~ eivind$
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
ed out; no servers could be reached
Eivind-mac:~ eivind$ dig any metropolitanbuntu.co.za @41.134.194.91
; <<>> DiG 9.6.0-APPLE-P2 <<>> any metropolitanbuntu.co.za @41.134.194.91
;; global options: +cmd
;; connection timed out; no servers
something?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
ed to slave it from any of the 6 in-addr.arpa
nameservers: [a-f].in-addr-servers.arpa
I'm guessing your logs also have entries about being unable to do zone
transfers of in-addr.arpa.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/ma
ooking into named.stats
wherever your nameserver has its working directory. If you found the file
- wait a while, run the command again to dump another set of statistics -
you should now have some numbers available in that file and can now
calculate how many queries you have per second on average.
R
ration changes from BIND8 to BIND9.
In general, what I'd recommend is:
1) Read that migration document
2) Test your existing named.conf + zonefiles by either loading them into
BIND9 directly, or by using the named-checkconf / named-checkzone commands
from BIND9.
3) Watch your logs
Regards
E
be likely to even notice?
Also, BIND8 has been deprecated for almost 4 years now.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
cords;
if ns[1-2].myzone.com are registered as nameservers and have their own
glue records, you should make sure those are updated to the new IP
addresses as well.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists
llow BIND to
write to your logfile in that specific directory.
The short version of this: learn how to use SELinux if you are going to
have it enabled, otherwise you might as well disable it...?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
n your zonefile - that is 4 w's
and not just the 3 you try to ping.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
se through named-checkconf /
named-checkzone).
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
e lookup zone for your internal subnet. It really isn't important,
even though nslookup tends to think it is.
In general, I'd recommend debugging/testing DNS lookups with a proper tool
like dig, and not nslookup which has a couple of snags which can easily
c
p-uspto.gov.
I can't, no. It looks fine enough when I check here (a bit odd to only
have a single nameserver, but that's beside the point).
[eivind@vimes ~]$ dig +short mx coop-uspto.gov
5 coop-mbxhc-1.coop-uspto.gov.
5 coop-mbxhc-0.coop-uspto.gov.
[eivind@vimes
n name(s) if you haven't already done so.
- tell your registrar to configure your parent domain so it'll delegate
your domain to your nameservers.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
ith this issue much faster than I'd have expected
really. No, I'm not saying I'd have expected you to take ages, but
hopefully you know what I'm trying to say here. Keep up the good work!
--
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
___
bi
n able to reproduce it on a DNSSEC-validating BIND either.
I'm not saying there's no bug, only that I can't reproduce it myself
(probably, I'm doing something wrong).
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
___
bind-users mailing list
eck if I can get them to
crash).
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
single of your
nameservers, doing manual queries to all 4 Google nameservers (ns1 - 4)?
Same result from all 4, or different results?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
u come from.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
ng like this to your options block in named.conf:
listen-on-v6{ any; };
I see you mention you run ISC DHCP 4.1 of some version: yes, the DHCP
software can currently only run either IPv4 or IPv6. BIND can easily deal
with both protocols at the same time.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
__
t is it worth it?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
example.com.
The $ORIGIN will be appended here to the non-FQDN, meaning you really have:
sccnj04.sccnj04.example.com. IN NS sip.example.com.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
dHat package, so
I on't know how it expects things to be set up, if you're using the
bundled start script.
If the permissions initially look good, I suggest you look into whether
you have SELinux running, maybe its policies are making problems for you?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor
Marion Bogdanov wrote:
> In my preparation to upgrade from 9.7.3 to 9.8.0. I figured it would be
> worth to field the obvious question: has anyone run into any problems in
> their upgrade?
I haven't notice anything myself really, but would be interested in
hearing of others have.
;, ISC_TRUE },
{ "28.172.IN-ADDR.ARPA", ISC_TRUE },
{ "29.172.IN-ADDR.ARPA", ISC_TRUE },
{ "30.172.IN-ADDR.ARPA", ISC_TRUE },
{ "31.172.IN-ADDR.ARPA", ISC_TRUE },
{ "168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA", ISC_TRUE },
#endif
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
S record in the
zonefile, and isn't listed with also-notify either. Am I right?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
ems with one of these two (ns.uat /
ns2.uat)? If it isn't, have you told the master nameserver about the slave
with for example the also-notify option?
How have you configured BIND on the master nameserver, with regards to
notify settings?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv
t a CNAME outside
of the zone, pointing to www.whitehouse.gov.edgesuite.net which is yet
another CNAME pointing to a1128.h.akamai.net. Neither of these seem to be
DNSSEC signed.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.
e - with normal use, it
should stabilize on some amount by itself, based on your usage patterns.
Memory is fairly cheap these days, too.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
> In the bind 8 days people would put the same address multiple times and
> then
> other addresses as well to "weight" the responses.
Yes, but in the example given it's the same address all the time, no
mention of any other addresses, and that's why I ask - wh
kup sva.com
> Name: sva.com
> Addresses: 10.10.10.10, 10.10.10.10, 10.10.10.10, 10.10.10.10,10.10.10.10
You would like it to point to the same IP-address many times? Why?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.o
a you are guaranteed to have in your local cache? Or would your testing
require your server to go out on the Internet and be at the mercy of
external servers as well?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.i
ed recursive clients in named.conf, but that's
all.
I didn't spend time on getting higher qps during testing, as I figured
10 qps in best-case conditions on a single server would suffice, at
least for the time being.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
ritative for that domain (define
it as a zone etc.), or configure RPZ which is supported in BIND 9.8.0 for
example.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
iharrathi@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
> Is there anyway to enable priority on A or NS record?
No.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
servers you
have as well)
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
llowing/denying zone transfers etc - this example is
just meant to show the basic case)
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
server
No. Don't do that. A cache/resolver is not the same as an authoritative
server. For example, it will not flag the cache contents as being
authoritative (the AA flag).
Get a proper secondary/slave nameserver somewhere, it doesn't need to be
costly.
R
ONAL: 1
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;fakessh.eu.IN NS
;; Query time: 55 msec
;; SERVER: 87.98.186.232#53(87.98.186.232)
;; WHEN: Mon Ma
d in this query, or is that nameserver
really weird?
4) If you've sorted all the stuff above: now is the time to try to add the
DS or DLV records. I'd not suggest you try this before the previous issues
have been corrected.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
y does it say?
I'm guessing you might have enabled dynamic updates in a DNSSEC signed
zone, without BIND having access to the private keys needed to sign, but
that's a wild guess really.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind
n some template, if there's not a specific
record already defined?
--
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
You are normally required to have at least two nameservers for your domains.
Keep in mind that any ipv6-only hosts will be unable to use your ipv4
nameservers.
Did this answer your question?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
Den 14. mars 2011 kl. 00:10 skrev "fakessh @" :
> How is it necess
> Is both of the zone loaded from DLZ?
In my tests? Neither of the zones, it was just meant to show that the
"rndc reload" error message was the same as if BIND had no idea about the
zone.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
___
bind-
he original poster looks at it to see if is of
any help).
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
r
BIND is running as?
For example,
http://fixunix.com/dns/55171-chrootd-bind-dlz-file-__db-00-perms-causing-rndc-reload-fail-where-set-change-them.html
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
u, you'll need to configure it, for example by
setting up an rndc.key file (location depending on your installation of BIND).
An easy way to configure rndc is with the "rndc-confgen -a" command line.
--
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
z.net/d/nicolaspichot.fr/dnssec/
especially about missing key 12961.
--
Regards
Eivind Olsen
eiv...@aminor.no
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
ally it should log how many threads it's using.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
don't think the hosts file is very suited for LOC, TXT and other such records.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
nless you have a very good
reason. And if your Internet connection goes down, does it really matter
whether you can do lookups, if you can't make the connections anyway?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
htt
n't capable of sending emails to
such domain names - unless you make your users send directly to the
punycode version - and really, you can't expect people to do that
manually.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
notifies, true. But I don't need that. Currently the root zone has a
refresh value of 1800 seconds and expire = 604800 seconds, so my slave
servers will check the root for updates often enough.
One advantage is that we can now instantly reject queries for things
like "ei
es" lists some RESERVED0 as well.
Should I expect to see these out in the wild? Or should I only really
worry if they're listed in bigger numbers?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
< 256; $bnet++) {
for ($cnet = 0; $cnet < 256; $cnet++) {
for ($dnet = 0; $dnet < 256; $dnet++) {
print "${dnet}.${cnet}.${bnet} PTR
${network}-${bnet}-${cnet}-${dnet}.mynetwork.\n";
}
}
}
(no, I'll not pr
n no longer piggyback off the
previous line you've just commented out). You didn't mention whether you
already were commenting out the A record or not.
Check your logs to see if BIND complains about anything. Also try pushing
your zonefile through named-c
n extract
from the BIND 9.7 ARM, section 6.2.16.2:
"Forwarding occurs only on those queries for which the server is not
authoritative and does not have the answer in its cache."
How exactly had you configured forwarding in your named.conf file?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
vendor supplied BIND for some operating system /
distribution, I guess it depends on how it's packaged etc.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
e changes being made, so it can give a meaningful reply when
asked to provide "all changes since serial number X", so you'll normally
see IXFR being possible for dynamically updated zones (and a couple of
other cases, check the ARM).
Regards
Eivind Olsen
__
ons of the name, on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BIND :
The acronym of BIND is Berkeley Internet Name Domain in a technical paper
published in 1984. However, the most common acronym today and the one that
can be found on the ISC web site is Berkeley Internet Name Daemo
tains "$TTL 86400" or whatever. Try
it and see if that works for you :D
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
.com doesn't know how to
deal with requests coming in for www.ioanamorosan.com and gives that error
message.
The administrators of the webserver could add a ServerAlias setting in
their Apache configuration, to put requests into the correct document
root.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
_
query for the same name will get a faster answer from the cache?
Did you flush the cache between tests?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
> http://pastebin.com/7Be9FavZ
That zonefile seems to be for fakessh.eu, and not for ovh.net.
Your initial problem was regarding IPv6 towards r13151.ovh.net ? If so,
that's the zonefile we'll need to look at.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
_
mit BIND to a specific port
for external (outbound) queries
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
m not 100% sure I understand the question.
I don't see any record for r13151.ovh.net, only a normal IPv4 A record:
Eivind-mac:~ eivind$ dig +short a r13151.ovh.net
87.98.186.232
Eivind-mac:~ eivind$ dig +short r13151.ovh.net
Eivind-mac:~ eivind$
of outstanding queries (-q number) will make a
difference?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
(Resending it here, didn't mean to reply just to you Alan)
> On 1/6/2011 3:38 AM, Eivind Olsen wrote:
>> (Yes, I know it's best practice to combine the authoritative + recursive
>> functionality)
> [...] it's NOT best [...]
Yep, I knew that. Embarassing of me to
ead.
(Yes, I know it's best practice to combine the authoritative + recursive
functionality)
Is my mind playing tricks with me?
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
efficient/parallel way to do this..
Depends, really. rndc itself can work remotely, but that might not be an
option in all networks.
Regards
Eivind Olsen
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo