I run bind multi master on 5 different site.
my solution is bind-dlz with galeraDB backed.
we are very satisfied by this configuration and works flawlessy until now.
Rick
On 5/7/14 8:11 PM, John Wingenbach wrote:
I run a multi-master environment. We have 3 data centers which are
considered
hello I am running named with sdb support on CentOS 6.4
here are the componetns I Am using
bind-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6_4.4.x86_64
bind-utils-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6_4.4.x86_64
bind-libs-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6_4.4.x86_64
bind-sdb-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6_4.4.x86_64
bind-chroot-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6_4.4.x86_64
Hello, I have a domain called mydomain.org
I would need a way to allow access with nsupdate not to the entire
domain mydomain.org
but only to specific hosts and specific IP Address do be modified using
nsupdate.
here is my config
zone mydomain.org IN {
type master;
Hello,
I need to implement a bind filter for many hundreds of domains which are
considered outlaw and illegal
by italian government about gamble games.
If I create a named zone for each illegal domain and configure my
nameserver as authoritative
for those zones, I can catch the DNS
On 8/30/12 2:32 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 02:14:38PM +0200,
fddi f...@gmx.it wrote
a message of 23 lines which said:
I need to implement a bind filter for many hundreds of domains which
are considered outlaw and illegal
See http://pwd.io/guide/. Very good
On 8/30/12 3:14 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:34:07PM +0100,
Niall O'Reilly niall.orei...@ucd.ie wrote
a message of 32 lines which said:
Don't waste your time.
This approach is superficial.
http://www.bortzmeyer.org/images/please-close-gate.jpg
On 8/30/12 3:19 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 03:16:32PM +0200,
fddi f...@gmx.it wrote
a message of 15 lines which said:
Actually many telephone companies in the world are doing this,
They're wrong politically (censorship) and they're wrong technically
(see
Hello,
I have primary DNS server for TLD domain mydomain.org which is also a
secondary DNS server for many other subdomains like
domainX.mydomain.org
this name server IP Address is 131.x.y.z domain is mydomain.org ang his
hostname is server2.mydomain.org
he si serving as secondary the
Hello.
if I query my domain zone with dig I have correct values as response.
dig mydomain.com SOA
now if I query one of my subdomains
dig subodmain.mydomain.com SOA
in the response I have a
ANSWER SECTION and AUTHORITY SECTION.
but I do not have an ADDICTIONAL SECTION and I did not expect
Hello,
I have a domain.com
with w nameservers defined, for example
;; ANSWER SECTION:
domain.com.86400INNSns1.domain.com.
domain.com.86400INNSns2.domain.com.
;; ANSWER SECTION:
ns1.domain.com.86400INA172.16.16.1
ns2.domain.com.86400
bind performances are excellent also on FreeBSD and OpenBSD.
Myself if I were a big ISP I would use OpenBSD, mainly for a security
point of view.
Riccardo
On 3/11/11 9:23 AM, Chiesa Stefano wrote:
-Messaggio originale-
Da: bind-users-bounces+stefano.chiesa=wki...@lists.isc.org
On 2/14/11 4:11 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Doug Bartondo...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 2/13/2011 8:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
It isn't a matter of not liking it. Given that you have steadfastly
refused
I will consider very much your hints. Thank you for your point of view and I
would like to try What you suggested.
Riccardo
On 14/feb/2011, at 00:24, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 2/13/2011 8:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution
on the two servers
and the mysql solution looks safer to me. You do not have to rsync
anything, just have mysql properly configured.
Riccardo
On 2/12/11 11:33 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/11/2011 01:51 PM, fddi wrote:
I understand you, but the advantage of having mysql backend is that
if one
mechanism. if I
use file backend I have to manually sync
it, and how to keep tracks of modifications ?
for this I choose mysql backend
Riccardo
On 2/11/11 10:29 PM, David Sparro wrote:
On 2/9/2011 7:12 PM, fddi wrote:
I could succesfully setup bind with mysql backend and it works using
bind
Riccardo
On 2/8/11 12:07 AM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
fddi writes:
Hello,
I would like to configure a multi-master configuration wirh 2 hosts
and I have been thinking to mysql as a backend.
Is there any official or semi-official support in bind for using
mysql as backend ?
Any kind
thank you for hte thread you pointed me.
Actaully I do not have performance issue, but I just need DNS multi-master.
I could succesfully apply mysql-bind patches.
I have only one zone with few hosts.
thank you very much
Riccardo
On 2/8/11 3:30 PM, Terry. wrote:
2011/2/8 fddif...@gmx.it:
I
trying them out
thank you for all the suggestions you gave me
Riccardo
On 2/8/11 4:28 PM, Gary Wallis wrote:
fddi wrote:
thank you for hte thread you pointed me.
Actaully I do not have performance issue, but I just need DNS
multi-master.
I could succesfully apply mysql-bind patches.
I have
Wallis wrote:
fddi wrote:
thank you for hte thread you pointed me.
Actaully I do not have performance issue, but I just need DNS
multi-master.
I could succesfully apply mysql-bind patches.
I have only one zone with few hosts.
thank you very much
Riccardo
On 2/8/11 3:30 PM, Terry. wrote:
2011
Hello,
I would like to configure a multi-master configuration wirh 2 hosts and
I have been thinking to mysql as a backend.
Is there any official or semi-official support in bind for using mysql
as backend ?
Any kind of documentation on this ?
thank you
Riccardo
Hello I have a question.
I am going to start in production environment a bunch of 3 mail servers
for my domain, let'say mydomain.com
I need to install a X509 certificate on each server in a way that upon
x509 authentication thunderbird
or whatever MUA won't complain about hostname different
hello,
on my server I have many errors like this one:
Aug 10 11:12:01 server2 named[31822]: dispatch 0x2c159550: shutting
down due to TCP receive error: 213.198.65.226#53: connection reset
anyone could give me some more hint ?
does this mean that 213.198.65.226 is broken ?
thanks
Rick
Hello,
I wanted to ask if using TXT fields can have some bad implication
security issues
thanks
Rick
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-net.net wrote:
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 17:37:46 +0200
From: fddi f...@gmx.it
To: Bind Users Mailing List bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: problem with domain and sub-domain configuration
X-FuHaFi: 0.68005
Hello I have one domain
test.com with namserver ns.test.com (10.0.0.1
Hello I have one domain
test.com with namserver ns.test.com (10.0.0.1)
and a subdomain
cr.test.com with nameserver ns.cr.test.com (10.1.0.1)
my problem is that if I update hostnames inside test.com zone
updates are not seen by cr.test.com nameserver
they are seen if I restart named on
Hello I have a name server which is slave for many other zones.
The problem is that I upgraded to bind 9.3.x and now I have plenty of
messages like:
IN: refused notify from non-master: itselfIPaddress
how can I avoid this ?
Do I ahev to insert
notify no
for every zone in which it is slave
hello,
I have many IP sunets which are /22 or /21 and it is really annoying to
write 8 reverse subnets
for a 10.10.0.0/21 network in the named.rev:
I have to put 8 entries like
zone 0.10.10.in-addr.arpa IN {
zone 1.10.10.in-addr.arpa IN {
zone 2.10.10.in-addr.arpa IN {
zone
thank you to all for the explanatinos, I'll create all my /24 reverse
with a python script :)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I have many IP sunets which are /22 or /21 and it is really annoying to
write 8 reverse subnets
[...]
is there a way to write only one reverse zone for /22
Hello,
is anyone using a mysql backend for bind9 ?
how to setup it ?
thanks
Rick
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Hello I wanted to ask how could be possible in some way
to have 2 or more multi master name servers authoritative for one domain,
instead of the classical master slave model.
thank you
Rick
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
Doug Barton wrote:
On 2/5/2010 2:41 PM, fddi wrote:
Hello I wanted to ask how could be possible in some way
to have 2 or more multi master name servers authoritative for one domain,
instead of the classical master slave model.
Yes.
so should I use somthing like rsync or cfengine
31 matches
Mail list logo
