erver?
Right now I'm using the same named.conf on both BIND versions, the only
difference is the version of BIND.
Thank you,
Julian
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Andrews"
To: "ic.nssip"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 6:04 AM
Subject: Re: Quer
967...@internal.corp.ds>, "ic.nssip"
writ
es:
Hello everyone,
I have a strange issue on a DNS server that is not able to resolve =
www.cancer.ca [65.110.160.32].
If somebody has an idea about what is going wrong there, I will really =
appreciate any suggestions on how to make it w
Hello everyone,
I have a strange issue on a DNS server that is not able to resolve
www.cancer.ca [65.110.160.32].
If somebody has an idea about what is going wrong there, I will really
appreciate any suggestions on how to make it work.
Here is my dig and dig +trace test on that server:
U:\>dig
Hello everyone,
I hope somebody can tell me why I'm getting so many "DNS format error" on a DNS
Server running BIND 9.7.0 on a Solaris 10 machine.
The server is resolving fine queries for normal traffic. Is just syslog that
gets tones of messages like the ones in the next capture.
The start comm
Hello everyone,
I just enabled querylog (using rndc querylog command) and each first query
logged it's coming with errors (network unreachable) when trying to resolve dns
servers names.
Has anyone any idea where from this sort of message is coming from and what
should I do to get it fixed?
Th
ore external queries?
Em 19/03/2010 19:43, ic.nssip escreveu:
and the results came up with a statement that "External Queries are
REJECTED" and "It would be better for it to ignore external queries."
_Question is... How can I IGNORE External Queries instead of Rejecting
the
Hello everyone,
I'm currently using an ACL for allow-query statement, which I thought it's fine.
Recently I did a spoofability test on:
https://www.grc.com/dns/dns.htm
and the results came up with a statement that "External Queries are REJECTED"
and "It would be better for it to ignore extern
I had some problems with versions prior 9.7.0, when the response time
dramatically increased for hours after two or 3 days after cache reached the
maximum size in the memory. I used to restart named process and everything was
good for few days again. I have 9.7.0 up for the last week and it didn
ginal Message -
From: "Kevin Darcy"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: recursion
On 3/10/2010 4:45 PM, ic.nssip wrote:
I've got the idea!
So even I have no statement "recursion yes", the server is still
recursive as time I dont specify "re
I've got the idea!
So even I have no statement "recursion yes", the server is still recursive
as time I dont specify "recursion no;"
It is going to make no difference if I'll add "recursion yes;" on options.
Is "localnets" a term I really need to use?
Currently I'm using an ACL defined for "ac
If there is no option "recursion yes (or no);" specified in named.conf, is the
server still recursive?
Is "recursion" activated by default if option recursion (yes|no) is missing in
named.conf?
Thank you,
Julian
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users
Yup! That's what I need.
Thank you for all suggestion!
Best Wishes!
Julian
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
What I'm trying to do is to find a way to get the TTL left for a cached
record.
I usually use dnsquery like this (12m23s and 9m53s is what interest me):
# dnsquery -n 8.8.8.8 -t a ftp.funet.fi
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47912
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTH
some dependencies?
Is any chance I can find a Windows version of this dnsquery command (as
there is one distribution only for dig)?
Thank you,
Julian
On Mar 9 2010, Sam Wilson wrote:
In article ,
"ic.nssip" wrote:
I find it useful to test records cache time.
dig tells you that.
I find it useful to test records cache time.
I'll check on BIND 8 package.
Thank you for pointing to a Solaris compatible source.
Julian
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy C. Reed"
To: "ic.nssip"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:56 AM
Subject: Re:
Hello everyone,
Can somebody suggest a place where from I can download dnsquery source/pkg to
make it work on Solaris 10?
I have it installed on a FreeBSD machine but imported to Solaris is reporting
some syntax error
# dnsquery www.google.com
dnsquery: syntax error at line 1: `(' unexpected
T
Hi Mark,
Thank you for your prompt answer and for taking off my worries that I'm
missing something there.
Best Regards,
Julian
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Andrews"
To: "ic.nssip"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: Loop
Hello everyone,
When running "make test" on a BIND 9.7.0 installed on a x86 SUN Solaris 10
machine, I've got this message:
I:NOTE: Many of the tests were skipped because they require that
I: the IP addresses 10.53.0.1 through 10.53.0.5 are configured
I: as alias addresses on the loopba
I just installed ISC 9.7.0 on one of our x86 SUN Solaris 10 machines.
I did a fresh local compiled install with all default settings.
It looks that DNS is working fine for customers (anyway the time is too
short to conclude that), but my syslog suddenly got populated with tones of
daemon.notice
Hi Doug,
I just installed from a local compiled bind-9.7.0.tar.gz with all ISC defalt
settings and the issue is gone.
Thank you,
Julian
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Barton"
To: "ic.nssip"
Cc: "Mark Andrews" ;
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010
al/rrdtool-1.2.19/include -I/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/include
-I/usr/local/include/lzo' 'CXX=g++'
'CXXFLAGS=-fpermissive -felide-constructors'
Thank you,
Julian
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Andrews"
To: "ic.nssip"
Cc:
Sent: Thur
Hello everyone,
I tried to install BIND 9.7.0 from www.sunfreeware.com on a Solaris 10, x86
machine that was running before BIND 9.6.1-P1 with no problems.
The new install goes to the same directories, but for some reasons when I
run named-checkconf for my default /etc/named.conf file I get:
Does anyone knows if there is any solaris .pkg distribution for BIND 9.6.1-P1?
Im looking to replace old versions as per:
https://www.isc.org/node/474
Thank you,
Julian___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman
Does anyone knows if there is any solaris .pkg distribution for BIND 9.6.1-P1?
Im looking to replace old versions as per:
https://www.isc.org/node/474
Thank you,
Julian___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/l
I'm using 9.6.1 from sunfreeware.com on a x86 IBM dual core (Solaris 10) and
never had a problem with it.
Good luck!
Julian
- Original Message -
From: Laurence Stendard
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 2:31 PM
Subject: Bind 9.6.1 stops after few hours
I had the same problem yesterday with two servers running BIND 9.5.0-P2 on
SPARC Solaris 8.
I had to kill the process few times and finally it worked.
After a time it failed again to resolve MX records for the same users.
I updated the root zone (it had some old records) and it never failed aga
Greetings everyone,
I have only a little question about Bind 9 Configuration and Statistics page.
I activated statistics-channels on a 9.5.0-P2 and a 9.6.0 DNS Server.
I'm not getting any records for:
- Outgoing Queries from View _default
- Outgoing Queries from View _bind
- Cache DB RRsets for V
27 matches
Mail list logo
