On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Torinthiel wrote:
Dnia 2011-02-14 15:52 Mike Mitchell napisał(a):
I'd keep two copies of the BIND config, one that has all the zones as
"master", and one that has all the zones as "slave". When the
master dies,
run a little script on a slave that freezes the z
er now having said that.
>
> --
> Gordon A. Lang / 313-819-7978
> - Original Message -
> From: Mike Mitchell
> To: fddi
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 10:52 AM
> Subject: RE: multi-master with mysql backend
>
>
> I&
ems
extremely insane.
Ah. There, I feel much better now having said that.
--
Gordon A. Lang / 313-819-7978
- Original Message -
From: Mike Mitchell
To: fddi
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 10:52 AM
Subject: RE: multi-master with mysql backend
I'd keep two
Dnia 2011-02-14 15:52 Mike Mitchell napisał(a):
>I'd keep two copies of the BIND config, one that has all the zones as
"master", and one that has all the zones as "slave". When the master dies,
run a little script on a slave that freezes the zones, edits the SOA to make
that server the MNAME
nces+mike.mitchell=sas@lists.isc.org] on behalf of
> Bill Larson [wllarso@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 14, 2011 10:39 AM
> *To:* fddi
> *Cc:* bind-users@lists.isc.org
> *Subject:* Re: multi-master with mysql backend
>
> On Feb 13, 2011, at 9:06 AM, fddi wrote:
>
February 14, 2011 10:39 AM
To: fddi
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: multi-master with mysql backend
On Feb 13, 2011, at 9:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
OK I am talking of a DNS for HA purposes for grid computing services for
examp
On Feb 13, 2011, at 9:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
OK I am talking of a DNS for HA purposes for grid computing services
for exampe, so DNS
resolution must be always working at any cost.
The David solution can be OK, but I want to be sure not
I will consider very much your hints. Thank you for your point of view and I
would like to try What you suggested.
Riccardo
On 14/feb/2011, at 00:24, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 2/13/2011 8:06 AM, fddi wrote:
>> I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
>
> It isn't a matter o
On 2/14/11 4:11 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 2/13/2011 8:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
It isn't a matter of "not liking" it. Given that you have steadfastly
refused to answer any of the qu
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 2/13/2011 8:06 AM, fddi wrote:
>>
>> I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
>
> It isn't a matter of "not liking" it. Given that you have steadfastly
> refused to answer any of the questions from people who are trying
On 2/13/2011 8:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
It isn't a matter of "not liking" it. Given that you have steadfastly
refused to answer any of the questions from people who are trying to
help you, my feeling is that you have decided that you wan
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
OK I am talking of a DNS for HA purposes for grid computing services for
exampe, so DNS
resolution must be always working at any cost.
The David solution can be OK, but I want to be sure not to have issues
with serial numbers on the
On 02/11/2011 01:51 PM, fddi wrote:
I understand you, but the advantage of having mysql backend is that
if one of the two servers dies, the other keeps running with up to
date informations, and can also be updated wit new informations. When
the other server comes up again it will automatically s
I understand you,
but the advantage of having mysql backend is that if one of the two
servers dies, the other keeps
running with up to date informations, and can also be updated wit new
informations. When the other server comes up again
it will automatically sync itself using mysql replica mech
On 2/9/2011 7:12 PM, fddi wrote:
I could succesfully setup bind with mysql backend and it works using
bind-mysql driver.
everything works except that nsupdate will no longer work.
is this normal ??
requests sent for adding a RR using nsupdate are ignored by named when
using mysqldb backend
w
I could succesfully setup bind with mysql backend and it works using
bind-mysql driver.
everything works except that nsupdate will no longer work.
is this normal ??
requests sent for adding a RR using nsupdate are ignored by named when
using mysqldb backend
while they are honoured and ser
>>> I need really something very simple:
>>>
>>>
>>> I have 2 domain name servers, I need them to be multi-master
>> Please explain -- *why* do you need multimaster?
>>
>>
>I need to be able to update the nameserver even if one of the two
>masters is down, I need this
>for High Avaliability purpos
On 2/9/11 2:15 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Feb 8, 2011, at 10:47 AM, fddi wrote:
I need really something very simple:
I have 2 domain name servers, I need them to be multi-master
Please explain -- *why* do you need multimaster?
I need to be able to update the nameserver even if one of the
On Feb 8, 2011, at 10:47 AM, fddi wrote:
> I need really something very simple:
>
>
> I have 2 domain name servers, I need them to be multi-master
Please explain -- *why* do you need multimaster?
> so I will put a mysql instance on each one,
> the two mysql servers in sync whith each other.
2011/2/9 Torinthiel :
> Or, if you need to be able to modify records from both servers than maybe
> multi-master with rsync'ing to the other server will work?
Mysql Active-Active replication could do that easily.
AFAIK, mysql backend BIND doesn't have the feature "notify", so
database replication
Dnia 2011-02-08 16:47 fddi napisał(a):
>I need really something very simple:
>
>
>I have 2 domain name servers, I need them to be multi-master so I will
>put a mysql instance on each one,
>the two mysql servers in sync whith each other.
>
>when one of the servers goes down, the other continue to
actually I Was too way optimistic. nothing works after patching named
woth mysql-bind source code:
/usr/sbin/named -f -u named -t /var/named/chroot
Segmentation fault
Feb 8 16:53:02 ns kernel: named[2239] general protection
rip:2af3633cfa10 rsp:40bb5148 error:0
On 2/8/11 4:28 PM, Gary Wal
I need really something very simple:
I have 2 domain name servers, I need them to be multi-master so I will
put a mysql instance on each one,
the two mysql servers in sync whith each other.
when one of the servers goes down, the other continue to work.
There are very few entry in hte databas
fddi wrote:
thank you for hte thread you pointed me.
Actaully I do not have performance issue, but I just need DNS multi-master.
I could succesfully apply mysql-bind patches.
I have only one zone with few hosts.
thank you very much
Riccardo
On 2/8/11 3:30 PM, Terry. wrote:
2011/2/8 fddi:
I
thank you for hte thread you pointed me.
Actaully I do not have performance issue, but I just need DNS multi-master.
I could succesfully apply mysql-bind patches.
I have only one zone with few hosts.
thank you very much
Riccardo
On 2/8/11 3:30 PM, Terry. wrote:
2011/2/8 fddi:
I have conside
2011/2/8 fddi :
> I have considered dlz, but it does mocu more than simply mysql backend and
> seems too way complicate for my porpouse.
> At hte end I am considering using this mysql-bind:
>
> http://mysql-bind.sourceforge.net/
>
You may read this one of the mailing list archive:
https://lists.is
I have considered dlz, but it does mocu more than simply mysql backend
and seems too way complicate for my porpouse.
At hte end I am considering using this mysql-bind:
http://mysql-bind.sourceforge.net/
do you think ti si a good alternative only for mysql backend propouses ?
thank you
Riccar
fddi writes:
Hello,
I would like to configure a multi-master configuration wirh 2 hosts and I
have been thinking to mysql as a backend.
Is there any official or semi-official support in bind for using mysql as
backend ?
Any kind of documentation on this ?
Try google with "bind dlz".
enabl
28 matches
Mail list logo