On 2/14/11 4:11 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Doug Bartondo...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 2/13/2011 8:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
It isn't a matter of not liking it. Given that you have steadfastly
refused to
I will consider very much your hints. Thank you for your point of view and I
would like to try What you suggested.
Riccardo
On 14/feb/2011, at 00:24, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 2/13/2011 8:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
It
On Feb 13, 2011, at 9:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
OK I am talking of a DNS for HA purposes for grid computing services
for exampe, so DNS
resolution must be always working at any cost.
The David solution can be OK, but I want to be sure
@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: multi-master with mysql backend
On Feb 13, 2011, at 9:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
OK I am talking of a DNS for HA purposes for grid computing services for
exampe, so DNS
resolution must be always working at any cost
:* bind-users@lists.isc.org
*Subject:* Re: multi-master with mysql backend
On Feb 13, 2011, at 9:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
OK I am talking of a DNS for HA purposes for grid computing services
for exampe, so DNS
resolution must
Dnia 2011-02-14 15:52 Mike Mitchell napisał(a):
I'd keep two copies of the BIND config, one that has all the zones as
master, and one that has all the zones as slave. When the master dies,
run a little script on a slave that freezes the zones, edits the SOA to make
that server the MNAME and
. There, I feel much better now having said that.
--
Gordon A. Lang / 313-819-7978
- Original Message -
From: Mike Mitchell
To: fddi
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 10:52 AM
Subject: RE: multi-master with mysql backend
I'd keep two copies of the BIND config, one
, February 14, 2011 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: multi-master with mysql backend
FWIW, I feel compelled to chime in -- for those who haven't already begun
to filter out this thread.
We have many thousands of records (internally) in hundreds of zones,
mostly dynamic.
We have 8 DNS servers
On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Torinthiel wrote:
Dnia 2011-02-14 15:52 Mike Mitchell napisał(a):
I'd keep two copies of the BIND config, one that has all the zones as
master, and one that has all the zones as slave. When the
master dies,
run a little script on a slave that freezes the
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
OK I am talking of a DNS for HA purposes for grid computing services for
exampe, so DNS
resolution must be always working at any cost.
The David solution can be OK, but I want to be sure not to have issues
with serial numbers on the
On 2/13/2011 8:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
It isn't a matter of not liking it. Given that you have steadfastly
refused to answer any of the questions from people who are trying to
help you, my feeling is that you have decided that you want
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 2/13/2011 8:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
It isn't a matter of not liking it. Given that you have steadfastly
refused to answer any of the questions from people who
On 02/11/2011 01:51 PM, fddi wrote:
I understand you, but the advantage of having mysql backend is that
if one of the two servers dies, the other keeps running with up to
date informations, and can also be updated wit new informations. When
the other server comes up again it will automatically
On 2/9/2011 7:12 PM, fddi wrote:
I could succesfully setup bind with mysql backend and it works using
bind-mysql driver.
everything works except that nsupdate will no longer work.
is this normal ??
requests sent for adding a RR using nsupdate are ignored by named when
using mysqldb backend
I understand you,
but the advantage of having mysql backend is that if one of the two
servers dies, the other keeps
running with up to date informations, and can also be updated wit new
informations. When the other server comes up again
it will automatically sync itself using mysql replica
I need really something very simple:
I have 2 domain name servers, I need them to be multi-master
Please explain -- *why* do you need multimaster?
I need to be able to update the nameserver even if one of the two
masters is down, I need this
for High Avaliability purposes for services
I have considered dlz, but it does mocu more than simply mysql backend
and seems too way complicate for my porpouse.
At hte end I am considering using this mysql-bind:
http://mysql-bind.sourceforge.net/
do you think ti si a good alternative only for mysql backend propouses ?
thank you
thank you for hte thread you pointed me.
Actaully I do not have performance issue, but I just need DNS multi-master.
I could succesfully apply mysql-bind patches.
I have only one zone with few hosts.
thank you very much
Riccardo
On 2/8/11 3:30 PM, Terry. wrote:
2011/2/8 fddif...@gmx.it:
I
fddi wrote:
thank you for hte thread you pointed me.
Actaully I do not have performance issue, but I just need DNS multi-master.
I could succesfully apply mysql-bind patches.
I have only one zone with few hosts.
thank you very much
Riccardo
On 2/8/11 3:30 PM, Terry. wrote:
2011/2/8
I need really something very simple:
I have 2 domain name servers, I need them to be multi-master so I will
put a mysql instance on each one,
the two mysql servers in sync whith each other.
when one of the servers goes down, the other continue to work.
There are very few entry in hte
actually I Was too way optimistic. nothing works after patching named
woth mysql-bind source code:
/usr/sbin/named -f -u named -t /var/named/chroot
Segmentation fault
Feb 8 16:53:02 ns kernel: named[2239] general protection
rip:2af3633cfa10 rsp:40bb5148 error:0
On 2/8/11 4:28 PM, Gary
2011/2/9 Torinthiel torinth...@data.pl:
Or, if you need to be able to modify records from both servers than maybe
multi-master with rsync'ing to the other server will work?
Mysql Active-Active replication could do that easily.
AFAIK, mysql backend BIND doesn't have the feature notify, so
On Feb 8, 2011, at 10:47 AM, fddi wrote:
I need really something very simple:
I have 2 domain name servers, I need them to be multi-master
Please explain -- *why* do you need multimaster?
so I will put a mysql instance on each one,
the two mysql servers in sync whith each other.
Hello,
I would like to configure a multi-master configuration wirh 2 hosts and
I have been thinking to mysql as a backend.
Is there any official or semi-official support in bind for using mysql
as backend ?
Any kind of documentation on this ?
thank you
Riccardo
24 matches
Mail list logo
