Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core

2014-06-24 Thread Wladimir
led bags. But that doesn't need to figure into how things are developed. Wladimir -- Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Communi

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core

2014-06-24 Thread Wladimir
lthough Pieter and I disagree with regard to issue #4351, we agree on wanting to keep (or at least making) bitcoind as lean as possible. Maintaining extra indices for others doesn't fit in there - that's also why the address index patch was not merged. An 'index node' coul

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core

2014-06-24 Thread Wladimir
eir own is a passed stage. There are many things that cannot be done at SPV level security with just the P2P protocol yet. So having fewer but more trusted Electrum servers is a reasonable compromise. But for basic wallet functionality it isn

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core

2014-06-24 Thread Wladimir
ut there are other interesting upcoming wallet projects as well, for example CoinVault. Wladimir -- Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications wit

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core

2014-06-24 Thread Wladimir
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Jorge Timón wrote: > On 6/23/14, Wladimir wrote: >> It's least surprising if the wallet works as a SPV client by default. >> Then, users can use it without first setting up a core. Thus the idea >> would be to use P2P primarily.

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core

2014-06-23 Thread Wladimir
chain database. But it needs its own record of the chain, headers-only + what concerns the keys in the wallet. Wladimir -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Mo

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use

2014-06-18 Thread Wladimir
s using these > experimental service bits. Anyhow -- back to the original proposal. I'm fine with setting aside part of the service bit space for experiments. Wladimir -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions

2014-06-18 Thread Wladimir
rate. As we all know, most wallet innovation doesn't happen in the reference implementation wallet, and it should not be used as the guide here. Wladimir -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use

2014-06-17 Thread Wladimir
ffer a certain extension. Alas, this moves it from a straightforward and common sense change to a significant change to the protocol. Wladimir -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions

Re: [Bitcoin-development] [ann] Bitcoin Core version 0.9.2 has been released

2014-06-17 Thread Wladimir
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: > On 17/06/14 11:46, Wladimir wrote: > Under Ubuntu 10.04: > > jcea@ubuntu:/tmp/bitcoin-0.9.2-linux/bin/64$ ./bitcoin-qt > ./bitcoin-qt: symbol lookup error: ./bitcoin-qt: undefined symbol: > _ZN10QTextCodec11validCodecsEv Di

[Bitcoin-development] [ann] Bitcoin Core version 0.9.2 has been released

2014-06-17 Thread Wladimir
- Mikael Wikman - Mike Hearn - olalonde - paveljanik - peryaudo - Philip Kaufmann - philsong - Pieter Wuille - R E Broadley - richierichrawr - Rune K. Svendsen - rxl - shshshsh - Simon de la Rouviere - Stuart Cardall - super3 - Telepatheic - Thomas Zander - Torstein Husebø - Wa

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use

2014-06-17 Thread Wladimir
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Wladimir wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Matt Whitlock > wrote: >> On Tuesday, 17 June 2014, at 9:57 am, Wladimir wrote: >>> Yes, as I said in the github topic >>> (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/4351) I sugge

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use

2014-06-17 Thread Wladimir
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Matt Whitlock wrote: > On Tuesday, 17 June 2014, at 9:57 am, Wladimir wrote: >> Yes, as I said in the github topic >> (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/4351) I suggest we adapt a >> string-based name space for extensions. > > Why

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use

2014-06-17 Thread Wladimir
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Peter Todd wrote: > Alternately Wladimir J. van der Laan brought up elsewhere(2) the > possibility for a wider notion of an extension namespace. I'm personally > not convinced of the short-term need - we've got 64 service bits yet > NODE_BL

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final

2014-06-13 Thread Wladimir
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Un Ix wrote: > How about a prize for anyone who can spot any "malicious" strings within next > hour? > > ;-) Hah, if there was to be a prize I'd rather have people looking out for icebergs than for wrongly arrange

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final

2014-06-13 Thread Wladimir
added that. Wladimir -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leve

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final

2014-06-13 Thread Wladimir
's typical that this little bikeshedding topic attracts so much attention. But if it makes all of you happy I won't do the translation update. Wladimir -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final

2014-06-13 Thread Wladimir
It cannot, it is just data. Wladimir -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for

[Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final

2014-06-13 Thread Wladimir
e language import and tag the release at the end of the (UTC) day so that gitian builds can be started. Corrections to the release notes (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/0.9.2/doc/release-notes.md) should also be submitted before then. Thanks

[Bitcoin-development] Anyone still using SOCKS4?

2014-06-11 Thread Wladimir
code paths - SOCKS5 offers better privacy as it allows DNS redirection Wladimir -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open

[Bitcoin-development] 0.9.2rc2 tagged, gitian builds needed

2014-06-10 Thread Wladimir
haven't seen any new problems reported, but it'd be useful to get these last-minute fixes tested too. Wladimir -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Mos

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin miner heads-up: "getwork" RPC going away

2014-06-07 Thread Wladimir
lock" which provides a much more flexible and scalable way to do mining. This is explained in https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Getblocktemplate . Wladimir -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book &qu

Re: [Bitcoin-development] # error "Bitcoin cannot be compiled without assertions." <<<

2014-06-06 Thread Wladimir
ms which are probably recoverable in a certain specific way. In principle starting a reindex wouldn't even need to take down the entire process (though that's easier for implementation due to cleanup and assumptions made). Wladimir ---

[Bitcoin-development] Do not use github issues on BIPs repository

2014-06-05 Thread Wladimir
issues (not pull requests, of course) on the repository. Wladimir -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. W

Re: [Bitcoin-development] # error "Bitcoin cannot be compiled without assertions." <<<

2014-06-04 Thread Wladimir
second class of debugging asserts would be > introduced, which is exclusively for expensive, redundant checks and is > disabled by NDEBUG. > Sounds good to me. Wladimir -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Rei

Re: [Bitcoin-development] # error "Bitcoin cannot be compiled without assertions." <<<

2014-06-04 Thread Wladimir
#x27;s fair to still require building with them enabled. Wladimir -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applicat

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.9.2 release candidate 1 is available

2014-06-04 Thread Wladimir
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Wladimir wrote: > Bitcoin Core version 0.9.2rc1 is now available from: > > https://bitcoin.org/bin/0.9.2/test > > This is a release candidate for a new minor version release, bringing > mostly bug fixes and some minor improvements. Almost forg

[Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.9.2 release candidate 1 is available

2014-06-03 Thread Wladimir
h - Simon de la Rouviere - Stuart Cardall - super3 - Telepatheic - Thomas Zander - Torstein Husebø - Warren Togami - Wladimir J. van der Laan - Yoichi Hirai -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph D

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Another uninitialized memory problem

2014-06-03 Thread Wladimir
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Toshi Morita wrote: > I'm seeing another uninitialized memory problem in bitcoind using valgrind: Thanks for the report. Which version/commit id of bitcoind? Wladimir -- Lea

Re: [Bitcoin-development] [QT] Feature proposal: Displaying current Units/Changing Units with status bar control.

2014-06-02 Thread Wladimir
header there as well, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/3970 . If that is done, I'm not sure how much a global setting in the status bar would add. It may make it more apparent to the user that multiple un

Re: [Bitcoin-development] PSA: Please sign your git commits

2014-05-23 Thread Wladimir
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Wladimir wrote: > Hello Chris, > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Chris Beams wrote: >> I'm personally happy to comply with this for any future commits, but wonder >> if you've considered the arguments against commit sign

Re: [Bitcoin-development] PSA: Please sign your git commits

2014-05-23 Thread Wladimir
interest is piqued by this, please pick it up. Wladimir -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled s

Re: [Bitcoin-development] PSA: Please sign your git commits

2014-05-21 Thread Wladimir
se I want to reduce the risk that github hacks would pose. Something to watch for would be authors that normally sign pull requests/merges and suddenly don't. Someone malicious may have gained access to their github account. This just adds an extra layer of protection. Cheers, Wladimir -

[Bitcoin-development] PSA: Please sign your git commits

2014-05-21 Thread Wladimir
477426dccb gpg: Signature made Wed 21 May 2014 12:27:55 PM CEST using RSA key ID 2346C9A6 gpg: Good signature from "Wladimir J. van der Laan " Author: Wladimir J. van der Laan Date: Wed May 21 12:27:37 2014 +0200 qt: Periodic language update ... You can also

Re: [Bitcoin-development] About the small number of bitcoin nodes

2014-05-19 Thread Wladimir
sure - there are tricks to limit rates anyway, like the script in contrib/qos, but to have it generally available the block download needs to be more robust first) Wladimir -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated C

Re: [Bitcoin-development] About the small number of bitcoin nodes

2014-05-19 Thread Wladimir
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Wladimir wrote: > > Some hacking with ncurses could quickly make a decent tool here. It > could be packaged with bitcoin itself but that's not necessary. For > example Tor has the tool 'arm' which is a separate package. Regar

Re: [Bitcoin-development] About the small number of bitcoin nodes

2014-05-19 Thread Wladimir
utward connectivity. > - Keep connections if bitcoind is restarted: > I noticed that if I restart bitcoind (to apply new config) my reset to 0 and > take some hours to rise up to ~40. I believe that my peers should notice > that I am down for less than ~15 minutes and try

Re: [Bitcoin-development] statoshi.info is now live

2014-05-13 Thread Wladimir
ions in UTXO set - Maybe some fee statistics, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3959 would be useful here - Number of orphan blocks/orphan transactions Wladimir -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cr

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Developer documentation on bitcoin.org

2014-05-11 Thread Wladimir
b.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/pull/393 > > Bitcointalk Thread: > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=511876.0 Great work! Very nice to see thorough developer documentation on bitcoin.org. I've already been reading it now and then and haven't found any techni

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Announcing the Statoshi fork

2014-05-08 Thread Wladimir
elf. And I suppose the registration for custom OIDs and such is kind of baroque. I'm not entirely convinced of what the added value in this case would be. Yes, there are tools for monitoring SNMP, but in my experience those tools usually support other ways of collecting statistics as

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Announcing the Statoshi fork

2014-05-08 Thread Wladimir
ther the stats would have to be public, or private/authenticated to parties the owner of the node configures themselves. Wladimir -- Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Announcing the Statoshi fork

2014-05-08 Thread Wladimir
rforming tests on the nodes. In a way it looks similar to how the Bitcoin DNS seeds work, trying to find good and stable nodes, although more extensive. Wladimir -- Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce M

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Announcing the Statoshi fork

2014-05-07 Thread Wladimir
istics. Wladimir -- Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity • Requirements for releasing software faster • Expert tips and advice for mig

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Announcing the Statoshi fork

2014-05-07 Thread Wladimir
ide? In that case the web service just has to collect and provide the data, and serve static html/js files. Wladimir -- Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Announcing the Statoshi fork

2014-05-07 Thread Wladimir
out showing stats from a node on a local web site on the #bitcoin-dev IRC a few days ago. At some point, if we're going to offer Bitcoin Core node-only installers, it'd be nice to include something like this s

Re: [Bitcoin-development] "bits": Unit of account

2014-05-04 Thread Wladimir
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Tamas Blummer wrote: > Wladimir, > > what is missing is a decision to pull for the reference client. > Or did I missed that bit? No opinion - we'll follow whatever the res

Re: [Bitcoin-development] "bits": Unit of account

2014-05-03 Thread Wladimir
nd > that feeds it, or a drill bit broken to bits after just a bit of use. +1 good summary And I think that's a good conclusion to this discussion about unit names on the development mailing list. Everything has been said now. Wladimir

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Compatibility Bitcoin-Qt with Tails

2014-05-02 Thread Wladimir
the usual Linux binary > compatible, or will there be a special binary just for systems running the > older Qt? The normal binary will be compatible. At some point we may add a binary that is linked to Qt 5.x as well for newer distributions, but compatibility is most impor

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Compatibility Bitcoin-Qt with Tails

2014-04-30 Thread Wladimir
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Kristov Atlas wrote: >> > Hey Wladimir, > > Thanks for building this binary. The initial problem with Qt was > resolved, and I was able to load the GUI that chooses my datadir. After > choosing the default datadir, however, it segfaulted. I&#

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Compatibility Bitcoin-Qt with Tails

2014-04-26 Thread Wladimir
ed > Segmentation fault > amnesia@amnesia:~/linux-4765b8c-gitian-2d48b96/32$ ./bitcoin-qt > Segmentation fault > amnesia@amnesia:~/linux-4765b8c-gitian-2d48b96/32$ ./bitcoin-qt > -proxy=127.0.0.1:9050 > Segmentation

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Development Roadmap of Bitcoin Core 0.9.2

2014-04-25 Thread Wladimir
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Kristov Atlas wrote: > Yes. Tails 1.1, based on Wheezy, will be out on June 10: > https://tails.boum.org/contribute/calendar/ Thanks! Wladimir -- Start Your Social Network

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Compatibility Bitcoin-Qt with Tails

2014-04-25 Thread Wladimir
linux-4765b8c-gitian-2d48b96.tar.gz https://download.visucore.com/bitcoin/linux-4765b8c-gitian-2d48b96.tar.gz.sig These bitcoin-qt executables *should* work on Debian Squeeze / Tails Linux. Let me know if it is the case. Wladimir

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Development Roadmap of Bitcoin Core 0.9.2

2014-04-24 Thread Wladimir
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Wladimir wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: > > But indeed we need to decide on a cut-off point. I'd have preferred > 4.7 or 4.8. Qt 4.6 is *ancient* - it was released in februari 2010. > Apart from tails

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Development Roadmap of Bitcoin Core 0.9.2

2014-04-24 Thread Wladimir
x27;d have preferred 4.7 or 4.8. Qt 4.6 is *ancient* - it was released in februari 2010. Apart from tails it doesn't seem like anyone is using those old stable distributions on the desktop. Wladimir -- Start Your Soc

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Development Roadmap of Bitcoin Core 0.9.2

2014-04-24 Thread Wladimir
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Wladimir wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: >>> If you are > > Another option: Instead of statically building it'd be easy enough to >

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Development Roadmap of Bitcoin Core 0.9.2

2014-04-24 Thread Wladimir
brary. Qt is, after all, forward-compatible - between the 4.x versions. This will lose some GUI features but if compatibility is more important here that's a choice that can be made. Wladimir -- Start Your Social N

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Development Roadmap of Bitcoin Core 0.9.2

2014-04-23 Thread Wladimir
> I see that the latest nightly build (thanks for that, Warren) is still not > compatible with Tails/Debian Squeeze. Is there still an intention to address > this issue? Might it be fixed by 0.9.2? Can you be more specific as to what problem you're hav

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Development Roadmap of Bitcoin Core 0.9.2

2014-04-22 Thread Wladimir
ACK, thanks for writing the announcement. Wladimir -- Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible,

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mailing list abuse

2014-04-20 Thread Wladimir
not go as far as calling it 'abuse' if it is not done on purpose. Probably the person doesn't even know he/she is doing this. Best to mail the person and ask (nicely) instead of complaining to the list. Wladimir ---

Re: [Bitcoin-development] "bits": Unit of account

2014-04-20 Thread Wladimir
ay back when, so this is kind of > reclaiming it. I think it's a great fit. That's a very anglocentric way of thinking. Here in the Netherlands, a "bit" is something you put in a horses's mouth. It's also used as imported word (in the information sense). W

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Warning message when running wallet in Windows XP (or drop support?)

2014-04-17 Thread Wladimir
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > Bringing the thread back on-topic: > Thanks. > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Wladimir wrote: > > Hello, > > Today I noticed that even my bank is warning people to not do internet > > banking with Windows

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Warning message when running wallet in Windows XP (or drop support?)

2014-04-17 Thread Wladimir
7;s over the top to compare this with in-browser banners. It could be so much as a one-time message. But it's time to close this issue. I'll do nothing here. I will however stop testing on a Windows XP VM myself. Wladimir ---

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Warning message when running wallet in Windows XP (or drop support?)

2014-04-16 Thread Wladimir
ll be actively analyzing patches to post-XP versions to find security problems that are patched there, to see if they can be exploited on XP. Wladimir -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Data

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Warning message when running wallet in Windows XP (or drop support?)

2014-04-16 Thread Wladimir
aal-engineer the user with malware on a compromised OS even with a trezor. Maybe: for 0.9.2 add a warning message and push people to upgrade (either to Win8.1 or something else), then in the next major release 0.10.0 drop XP support compl

[Bitcoin-development] Warning message when running wallet in Windows XP (or drop support?)

2014-04-16 Thread Wladimir
cially in China and Russia etc) are still running XP, so this could cause the network to lose nodes. If you're maintainer of other wallet software: how are you handling this? Are you going to drop XP support completely? If so, starting from when

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Ubuntu LTS Packaging?

2014-04-12 Thread Wladimir
pens on the Ubuntu build server, simply uses the operating system OpenSSL. So if you upgrade that you should be OK. Wladimir -- Put Bad Developers to Shame Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration Continuou

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Chain pruning

2014-04-10 Thread Wladimir
hat has that range. > That makes sense. In general, if you want a block 50 from the tip, it would be best to request it from a node that only serves the last N (N>~50) blocks, and not a history node that could use the same bandwidth to serve earlier, rarer blocks to others. Wladimir

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Chain pruning

2014-04-10 Thread Wladimir
This assumes that nodes will always be storing the latest blocks. For dynamic nodes that take part in the consensus this makes sense. Just wondering: Would there be a use for a [static] node that, say, always serves only the first 10 blocks? Or, even, a static range like block 10

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoind-in-background mode for SPV wallets

2014-04-10 Thread Wladimir
Do you know of any previous work towards this? Wladimir -- Put Bad Developers to Shame Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment Start a new project now

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoind-in-background mode for SPV wallets

2014-04-09 Thread Wladimir
initially, people wouldn't know why or when to install this, hence my suggestion to pack it with wallets... Wladimir -- Put Bad Developers to Shame Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration Continuously

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoind-in-background mode for SPV wallets

2014-04-09 Thread Wladimir
g libtorrent). > Parallel block download would be better for that. No need to involve bittorrent. But please let's not derail this thread, this is not about other solutions for faster block download or such, let's keep it focused. Wladimir -

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoind-in-background mode for SPV wallets

2014-04-09 Thread Wladimir
nds we are going to split off the wallet, and that will need an interface to an bitcoind to allow 'running with full node'. If that can be generalized to be useful for other (SPV) clients as well, that would be useful, hence I asked for input. It of course doesn't preclude also look

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoind-in-background mode for SPV wallets

2014-04-09 Thread Wladimir
ldn't be a big deal. It has been requested before for other purposes as well, all the better if it helps for interaction with Electrum. Spent history would be involve a much larger index, and it's not likely that will end up in bitcoin Wladimir -

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoind-in-background mode for SPV wallets

2014-04-09 Thread Wladimir
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Justus Ranvier wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/09/2014 06:19 PM, Wladimir wrote: > > If no one wants to volunteer resources to support the network > > anymore, we'll have failed. > > If the s

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoind-in-background mode for SPV wallets

2014-04-09 Thread Wladimir
l also help running it on consumer hardware. It's not the one or the other. Wladimir -- Put Bad Developers to Shame Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration Continuously Automate Build, Test &am

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoind-in-background mode for SPV wallets

2014-04-09 Thread Wladimir
t *need* a full node, but the point of this (which I clearly explained in my opening post) would be to support the network. Wladimir -- Put Bad Developers to Shame Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration Continu

[Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Bitcoind-in-background mode for SPV wallets

2014-04-09 Thread Wladimir
) choice to run a full node they will require the bandwidth and disk space to run it. The difference with running Bitcoin Core as wallet will be that they can choose their own wallet to go with the full node. Wladimir --

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoind-in-background mode for SPV wallets

2014-04-09 Thread Wladimir
ould a new API be needed? (beside maybe some functionality that would make it easier to integrate) P2P should be enough for SPV clients such as BitcoinJ to get access to (filtered) blocks and transations, and RPC can be used to manage/query the bitcoind instance. I&

[Bitcoin-development] Bitcoind-in-background mode for SPV wallets

2014-04-09 Thread Wladimir
s - maybe add a walletless bitcoind build to gitian - bindings, dlls, etc? Wladimir -- Put Bad Developers to Shame Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Why are we bleeding nodes?

2014-04-09 Thread Wladimir
tributors to Hive! > > How does that relate to the nodes issue? Would packaging an optional bitcoind with your wallet be an option, which is automatically managed in the background, so that users can run a full node if th

Re: [Bitcoin-development] have there been complains about network congestion? (router crashes, slow internet when running Bitcoin nodes)

2014-04-08 Thread Wladimir
ly the performance of the entire network at > some point. > There is enough lower-hanging fruit left. If you're interested in speeding up the performance I think it's important to start with benchmarking and analysis to find out where the pain points are. Wladimir

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Finite monetary supply for Bitcoin

2014-04-05 Thread Wladimir
e > format that is unambiguous across all cultures is -MM-DD. (No culture > uses -DD-MM, or at least the ISO seems to think so.) > Let's not waste any time shed-painting this. I'd like to finish this discussion at on

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Finite monetary supply for Bitcoin

2014-04-04 Thread Wladimir
prefer to standardize on ISO 8601 (-MM-DD) dates as well. Feel free to submit a pull against bips/bips that changes around the dates. Wladimir -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Detailed gitian build guide

2014-04-02 Thread Wladimir
quoted bash script is runnable as script) without automating the entire process, but I hope that over time we can make Gitian itself easier to use/setup, so that less steps are needed in the

[Bitcoin-development] Detailed gitian build guide

2014-04-02 Thread Wladimir
tcoin/pull/3994 Rendered version is here: https://github.com/laanwj/bitcoin/blob/2014_04_debian_gitian_build_doc/doc/gitian-building.md Comments and patches are welcome. If you bump into problems while following the guide please let me know. Wla

[Bitcoin-development] Anyone using bitcoind that needs RPC bound to interface? [testing needed]

2014-03-31 Thread Wladimir
merge. Test results from normal setups as well as weird corner cases (IPv4+IPv6, VPNs, ...) are welcome. Regards, Wladimir -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-develo

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 70 refund field

2014-03-28 Thread Wladimir
as it's as bad as not providing a refund address at all and brings back all the pre-BIP70 confusion. Wladimir -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@list

Re: [Bitcoin-development] HEADS UP: Bitcoin 0.9.0 doesn't work on old Linux

2014-03-19 Thread Wladimir
rsion `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by > ./bitcoind) > > $ ./bitcoin-qt > ./bitcoin-qt: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required > by ./bitcoin-qt) > ./bitcoin-qt: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required > by ./bitcoin-qt) > "

Re: [Bitcoin-development] [QT] how to disable block verification for faster UI testing?

2014-03-19 Thread Wladimir
The progress bar while reindexing? If you have database problems are you perhaps switching between 0.8.x and 0.9.x with the same directory? In that case see the downgrading warning here: https://bitcoin.org/bin/0.9.0/README.txt . Wladimir -

Re: [Bitcoin-development] External IP Address

2014-03-16 Thread Wladimir
is contained in the headers. > > Hope you find this useful. > Thanks for your effort. However the current idea is to phase out reliance on centralized external services completely in favor of peer-based address detection. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bit

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Physical key / edge detection software and PIN to generate private key

2014-03-13 Thread Wladimir
jects may deform over time). Wladimir -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed le

Re: [Bitcoin-development] moving the default display to mbtc

2014-03-13 Thread Wladimir
ew installs? Or will all current users automatically be switched over? Wladimir -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and t

Re: [Bitcoin-development] moving the default display to mbtc

2014-03-13 Thread Wladimir
c. Moving to muBTC (which in itself would be better because it is the final unit change ever needed without hardfork) would require more coordinated education effort. Wladimir -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O&

[Bitcoin-development] 0.9.0rc3 tagged

2014-03-13 Thread Wladimir
ystem, documentation and GUI changes. Please start your gitian builds. Wladimir -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their appl

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Process for getting a patch aproved?

2014-03-05 Thread Wladimir
o mailing lists, at least when posted to github there will be a nagging 'issue' appearing until it is either merged or closed otherwise. If it concerns a proposed protocol change do discuss it on the mailing list, as people building other implementations read here and not o

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Procedure for non-tech contributions

2014-03-03 Thread Wladimir
release-notes.md - Click "edit" - Make your changes and add a commit message describing the change, usually something like 'doc: Add missing foowidget to release notes'. Wladimir -- Subversion Kills Pro

Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.9.0 release candidate two

2014-03-02 Thread Wladimir
very unlikely that bitcoind would connect to port 443, let alone 'attack' anything. Anything in debug.log regarding that IP? Wladimir -- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Positive and negative feedback on certificate validation errors

2014-02-28 Thread Wladimir
eone has compromised that server (or hijacked DNS) to serve fake and unsigned payment requests, the client can block these. Neither scenario will help in the case in which the server serving the Bitcoin URIs is compromised. Wladimir

Re: [Bitcoin-development] On OP_RETURN in upcoming 0.9 release

2014-02-24 Thread Wladimir
of bitcoin, as that only offers 256-bit security (at most) in the first place. And if this is not abused, these kind of transactions become popular, and more space is really needed, the limit can always be increased in a future version. Wladimir --

Re: [Bitcoin-development] getpeerinfo results

2014-02-22 Thread Wladimir
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Wladimir wrote: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Ronald Hoffman > wrote: > >> I noticed that the 'services' field appears to be garbled in the latest >> source code level from github. Bitcoind is connected to my Java node

<    1   2   3   >