On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:57:48 +0100 Karel Miklav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciprian Popovici wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:48:36 -0500 Matt Rowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try replacing everything in ~/.xinitrc with just an xterm. Let's see
if it's X or Blackbox at fault here. Also, once X
Ciprian Popovici wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:57:48 +0100 Karel Miklav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As long as you're happy... but 20 sec startup still doesn't seem all that
right to me.
This is a 300MHz machine, do you think it should perform better? To be
honest, I only use BB as a compromise
Ciprian Popovici wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:48:36 -0500 Matt Rowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try replacing everything in ~/.xinitrc with just an xterm. Let's see
if it's X or Blackbox at fault here. Also, once X started with just
the xterm, use the xterm to launch blackbox (simply call it).
I have Blackbox instaled on an older notebook. It takes it 40 seconds
to start, that's a second or two less than Gnome 2.6. TWM starts in 15
seconds, I don't know what is BB doing for so long. I only have
blackbox and bbkeys in .xinitrc.
What are your experiences? Is this normal?
blackbox has
Matt Rowley wrote:
blackbox has _never_ taken anywhere near that long for me, even on my
older hardware.
what version of blackbox? what version of bbkeys? are you just doing
'startx' or are you running xdm or gdm/kdm/etc?
No, xinit from virtual terminal, bb 0.65.0., bbkeys 0.8.6.
--
To
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Karel Miklav wrote:
I have Blackbox instaled on an older notebook. It takes it 40 seconds to
start, that's a second or two less than Gnome 2.6. TWM starts in 15
seconds, I don't know what is BB doing for so long. I only have blackbox
and bbkeys in .xinitrc.
What are
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:48:36 -0500 Matt Rowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
blackbox has _never_ taken anywhere near that long for me, even on my
older hardware.
what version of blackbox? what version of bbkeys? are you just doing
'startx' or are you running xdm or gdm/kdm/etc?
No, xinit
