Re: Unicode support in libbt and blackbox

2004-09-03 Thread Markus Ottenbacher
Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper wrote: On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 23:05, Steven Kah Hien Wong wrote: On Debian Testing, and GCC v3.3 I suspect, you will get a link error when trying to compile Blackbox. I've tracked down similar link errors on Google: http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2004/08/msg00271.html

Re: Unicode support in libbt and blackbox

2004-09-03 Thread Bradley T Hughes
On Friday 03 September 2004 09:41, Markus Ottenbacher wrote: [snip] ... or SuSE 8.2/9.1 users (gcc 3.3 and gcc 3.3.3)... Could anyone explain above mentioned workaround? making an adapted copy-paste of the 'char_traits.h' file seems rather vague to me. The standard C++ library distributed

Re: Unicode support in libbt and blackbox

2004-09-03 Thread Matt Mills
Dave Yeo wrote: On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:26:43 +0200, Bradley T Hughes wrote: So, I've just spent some time working on one of the biggest deficiencies in 0.70.0-beta1: Unicode support. [...] Just wondering how hard it would be to make this an option? Specifically the dependency on libiconv. Dave I

Re: Unicode support in libbt and blackbox

2004-09-03 Thread Bradley T Hughes
On Friday 03 September 2004 12:43, Matt Mills wrote: Dave Yeo wrote: On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:26:43 +0200, Bradley T Hughes wrote: So, I've just spent some time working on one of the biggest deficiencies in 0.70.0-beta1: Unicode support. [...] Just wondering how hard it would be to make

Re: Unicode support in libbt and blackbox

2004-09-03 Thread Matt Mills
Bradley T Hughes wrote: On Friday 03 September 2004 12:43, Matt Mills wrote: Dave Yeo wrote: On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:26:43 +0200, Bradley T Hughes wrote: So, I've just spent some time working on one of the biggest deficiencies in 0.70.0-beta1: Unicode support. [...] Just wondering how hard it would

Re: Unicode support in libbt and blackbox

2004-09-03 Thread Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper
On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 04:10, Bradley T Hughes wrote: On Friday 03 September 2004 09:41, Markus Ottenbacher wrote: [snip] ... or SuSE 8.2/9.1 users (gcc 3.3 and gcc 3.3.3)... Could anyone explain above mentioned workaround? making an adapted copy-paste of the 'char_traits.h' file seems

Re: Unicode support in libbt and blackbox

2004-09-03 Thread Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper
On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 04:30, Bradley T Hughes wrote: On Friday 03 September 2004 10:10, Bradley T Hughes wrote: [snip] See the attached diff (I plan on putting this into CVS as soon as I verify it with a few more compilers). So far, I've checked g++ 3.3, g++ 3.4 and intel 8.0. I'm going

Re: Unicode support in libbt and blackbox

2004-09-03 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper wrote: g++ 2.95.4 (FreeBSD native compiler) I tried beta1 and now beta2 and can not compile with NetBSD's native 2.95.3. g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/pkg/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/pkg/include/freetype2 -I/usr/X11R6/include -DSHAPE

Re: Unicode support in libbt and blackbox

2004-09-02 Thread Bradley T Hughes
On Thursday 02 September 2004 03:59, Dave Yeo wrote: On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:26:43 +0200, Bradley T Hughes wrote: So, I've just spent some time working on one of the biggest deficiencies in 0.70.0-beta1: Unicode support. For blackbox users: This means that blackbox is on EWMH compliant,

Re: Unicode support in libbt and blackbox

2004-09-02 Thread Bradley T Hughes
On Thursday 02 September 2004 10:29, Ciprian Popovici wrote: Quoting Bradley T Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thursday 02 September 2004 03:59, Dave Yeo wrote: [...] Just wondering how hard it would be to make this an option? Specifically the dependency on libiconv. I'm not quite

Re: Unicode support in libbt and blackbox

2004-09-02 Thread Jan Schaumann
Ciprian Popovici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suppose at some point we will have to lose the no external dependencies other than X slogan. That is quite unfortunate. I was rather fond of being able to install my working environment with less than 10 add-on packages. FWIW, I don't really like

Re: Unicode support in libbt and blackbox

2004-09-02 Thread Ciprian Popovici
Quoting Bradley T Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thursday 02 September 2004 10:29, Ciprian Popovici wrote: [...] I suppose at some point we will have to lose the no external dependencies other than X slogan. :) Already 0.70 depends on XFT (although it's optional, granted) and now seemingly on

Re: Unicode support in libbt and blackbox

2004-09-02 Thread Ciprian Popovici
Quoting Jan Schaumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ciprian Popovici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suppose at some point we will have to lose the no external dependencies other than X slogan. That is quite unfortunate. I was rather fond of being able to install my working environment with less than 10

Re: Unicode support in libbt and blackbox

2004-09-02 Thread Bradley T Hughes
On Thursday 02 September 2004 16:18, Jan Schaumann wrote: Ciprian Popovici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suppose at some point we will have to lose the no external dependencies other than X slogan. That is quite unfortunate. I was rather fond of being able to install my working environment

Re: Unicode support in libbt and blackbox

2004-09-01 Thread Dave Yeo
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:26:43 +0200, Bradley T Hughes wrote: So, I've just spent some time working on one of the biggest deficiencies in 0.70.0-beta1: Unicode support. For blackbox users: This means that blackbox is on EWMH compliant, and exchanges strings with EWMH compliant